John Bull Profile picture
22 Jun, 6 tweets, 2 min read
See also:

Military historians who think that unless whatever you wrote covered EVERY SINGLE ASPECT of an action, your content is invalid.

"Your Twitter thread didn't mention XYZ"

It's a thread. My goal is getting them interested enough to go learn more
Just because I didn't over-explain it doesn't mean I didn't know it and consider it.

It just means it wasn't relevant to a broader narrative which has been caveated as BEING a broader narrative.
Or, to give a more specific example, not everyone gives a shit which exact unit was where, or the precise order of battle, before understanding the totality of what happened.
Wanting those things up front is often the result of a form of contextual privilege.

You kinda know enough about the broader situation or historical context already to want to jump to the hardcore detail.

It's sometimes easy to forget, as historians, that we carry that already.
Railway nerdery is the same. Just swap "knowledge of junctions and signalling systems" for "order of battle"
Hard agree. Don't treat me not mentioning machine gun design in a thread on the Emu War as personally offensive.

Treat it as an opportunity to nerd out about machine guns in a QT thread of your own.

Because I will 100% then point people to it as well!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Bull

John Bull Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garius

22 Jun
Taylor Swift is our Bruce Springsteen. This becomes clearer with every album.

I will be taking no further questions at this time.
I submit this before the court as evidence your honour.

Bruce fucking knocking storytelling out the PARK.
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
Academic Twitter is zombie accounts named after Research Groups that are clearly run by one male academic and only tweet five times a year.

- One is an event promo with the wrong date
- Three are RTs of the main uni account
- one is an accidental porn RT
This is not to say that there are not PLENTY of good academics on Twitter. I know and follow many.

They are not, however, "academic twitter"

Because they understand that Twitter is about engaging with people on equal terms, not expecting engagement as some kind of right.
Academic Twitter (capitalised) is the ones who refuse to Tweet anything because they're outraged they only have thirteen followers, despite the fact that they've written seven original tweets in the last four years.

One of which just said "Well I'm on Twitter now."
Read 5 tweets
21 Jun
It's almost like the TOC/DfT commitment to overhauling the fare system is the same as always:

About finding ways to LOOK like they've changed without changing.

The reason you can't use a smartcard everywhere has always been because you'd then automatically pay the lowest fare.
And you paying the lowest fare has never, ever been in the interest of the Train Operating Companies or the DfT.

It's why travelcards, and then Oyster, were so revolutionary. They legitimately put Londoners first.

That this still isn't the norm everywhere is stunning.
What they want is to have their cakes and eat it. They want to be able to say:

"Well TECHNICALLY, if you bought the weekday canet with pro-user discount via our dedicated (but not on google) website, and only caught the 7:34am or 8:23 trains you'd be travelling with 20% off!!!"
Read 6 tweets
17 Jun
I have a theory about classical music, which is that if you didn't grow up with it then it doesn't really grab you until later in life.

Not until the point where life, loves and loses fills the lyrical gap. Then BANG! The emotional of it all hits you hard. And you fall in love.
Of course I'm also smashing a lot of Port right now so take the previous tweet with a significant amount of salt.
Also, this has reminded me of when I used to drink in Janet's Bar down South Ken.

There used to be this world famous violinist who'd come in every now and again. But I didn't know that. Because he was modest as fuck and so I just assumed he was a general orchestra guy.
Read 11 tweets
17 Jun
Me in this Port tasting. columbo in any port in a storm
Progress so far Two glasses on a port tasting sheet
We're slowly getting older. single harvest Tawny ports all they way! Close up of port bottles
Read 6 tweets
17 Jun
Greg Tongue is an ageing master carpenter with no family of his own. Daz Groove is an inner city delinquent who just wants to be given a fresh start.

A chance meeting in B&Q may just change both their lives in ways they never expected.

Tongue & Groove.

A Netflix Original.
Almost, but not quite.

"For Want of a Nail" was the spin off show, featuring cheeky fellow chippy 'Geordie', played by Jimmy Nail.

Jimmy took its theme tune "For Want of a Nail" to number 4 in the charts. You're right that the dance remix made no. 1.
In the original Tongue & Groove, Greg Tongue was played by Dennis Waterman. He recorded the theme tune, "Just Another Rough Cut", but it barely bothered the charts (peaking at number 45).

Michael Sheen is playing Gregg in the Netflix remake. Not sure if he's singing the theme.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(