This week a coalition of advocates urged action on the Global HER Act, which members of Congress reintroduced earlier this year and would overturn the global gag rule.
Let’s dive into what the gag rule is and why advocates are saying #EndGagNow
THREAD:
The global gag rule prohibits federal funding for foreign nongovernmental organizations that provide abortion services or counseling—or even advocate for the decriminalization of abortion or expansion of services.
“Study after study has demonstrated that the neocolonialist global gag rule devastates health-care access for people around the world, especially those who already face systemic barriers to care.” —@dawnlaguens of @PPact
Like its domestic counterpart, the Hyde Amendment, which bans federal funding for abortion through programs like Medicare and Medicaid, the global gag rule singles out abortion as distinct from other care.
Abortion is health care, period.
The global gag rule was significantly expanded under the Trump administration and has had devastating effects on global health.
We also digged into how the global gag rule’s restrictions go beyond abortion—to comprehensive sex education, which is critical to ensure people lead healthy and empowered lives: rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2019/0…
Advocates say repealing the Global HER Act would ensure people around the world have access to the health care they need.
Considering @POTUS recently omitted the Hyde Amendment from his budget, there may be a reason to be optimistic about the Global HER Act.
But it’ll need support from lawmakers like @Sen_JoeManchin and @SenatorSinema, which means advocates still have work ahead of them.
For more on the efforts to overturn the global gag rule, abortion access in the United States and abroad, and how the Biden administration is addressing these issues, continue to follow us here on Twitter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Britney Spears appeared remotely in Los Angeles court yesterday and revealed just how oppressive her conservatorship is, telling the court she wants to have another baby, but her father is preventing her from removing her IUD.
“I want to be able to get married and have a baby. I was told right now in the conservatorship, I’m not able to get married or have a baby.”
How is this possible? Britney Spears is 39 years old, has had a successful Vegas residency, and continues to perform and tour.
It’s because for the past 13 years, Britney Spears has been under conservatorship. A conservatorship puts a court-mandated guardian in charge of the decision-making for people deemed unable to act in their own best interests.
U.S. Catholic bishops are meeting for their annual spring conference, and one of the things they’re discussing is whether Catholic politicians who support abortion rights—like @POTUS—should be denied Communion. #USCCB21
THREAD:
But the majority of U.S. Catholics believe abortion should be legal, as @jamielmanson, president of @Catholic4Choice, told us a couple months ago.
“The way the bishops make it this polarizing issue just is not a reflection of the reality on the ground.” rewirenews.link/3voqgY8
U.S. bishops have been divided for quite some time on how to deal with prominent Catholics who support abortion access.
For the right wing, this issue became even more urgent once Joe Biden came into office.
It’s happening! @Hegemommy and @AngryBlackLady are at @Smashitbreakrm as we speak, to (literally!) take a hammer to some of the worst anti-abortion legislation we've seen.
Tune in right now, by clicking the YouTube livestream link below!
“Hello, everyone! And WELCOME to today’s very exciting event for Rewire News Group! I’m @hegemommy, the SVP and Executive Editor of Rewire News Group—and co-host of our legal podcast, Boom! Lawyered.”
"A couple of weeks ago we asked you, our loyal listeners, readers, and fans, to rank some pretty awful anti-choice legislation and some cringe-worthy quotes from anti-choice lawmakers. We’ve now taken all of that harmful nonsense and put it on items—like this one!" 🔨
Today’s the anniversary of the Supreme Court guaranteeing the right to use birth control—but only for married couples.
Here’s a closer look at the 1965 landmark ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut.
THREAD:
At the time, Connecticut banned the use of contraceptives. So when Estelle Griswold, the head of Planned Parenthood in Connecticut, opened a birth control clinic with the help of a Yale med school doctor, they were arrested and convicted of violating the law.
But this was their plan all along!
You see, they wanted to use the clinic to challenge the draconian law under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution by arguing that banning birth control violated the privacy rights of married couples.
It's a hostile time right now for reproductive rights, but there are some members of Congress trying to help.
Join us on Instagram Live (@RewireNewsGroup) with Executive Editor @Hegemommy and Assistant Speaker @RepKClark for this important conversation—happening in 30 minutes
We're now live on Instagram and joined by @RepKClark
"Reproductive rights are human rights." - @RepKClark
Well, it’s Friday so that can mean only one thing: The Supreme Court is thinking about abortion again.
This time it’s not just one case they’re thinking about. It’s TWO!
The first case should be familiar to y’all by now. It involves a 15-week abortion ban out of Mississippi, and the Court has considered taking this case EIGHT TIMES SO FAR but hasn’t yet.
As @AngryBlackLady points out in her latest column we can’t figure out what on Earth the Court is thinking about because a 15-week abortion ban is flat out unconstitutional.