1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Manchin Agreeing to Vote to Start Debate On the Voting Bill

Just a note about Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) agreeing to vote yes to proceed to debate on the voting rights bill.

THIS DOESN’T CHANGE ANYTHING.
2) Democrats now have 50 votes to overcome the filibuster to start debate on the bill. You need 60 to crack a filibuster. So this wasn’t exactly a breakthrough at Yalta.
3) But, Manchin was taking a lot of heat from the left about not being a team player, supporting the Democratic agenda, et al.

So, Manchin developed a compromise plan which Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) embraced.
4) In fact, if the Senate EVER clears the procedural hurdle to begin debate on the bill, Schumer would make Manchin’s plan in order as a SUBSTITUTE for the entire bill. In other words, it’s MANCHIN’s bill, blessed by Stacey Abrams.

However…
5) It’s never going to get that far under these circumstances.

Democrats can’t get to 60 votes to hurdle the filibuster. And they can turn this around on the Republicans and accuse them of blocking the voting bill.
6) Democrats hope to reap political hay off what they will describe as GOP obstruction heading into the midterms if this bill remains stymied.

So, in many respects, this is a little bit of a nothing burger. Manchin developed a compromise for a bill which is going nowhere.
7) He reaps the benefits of looking like a team player and not an obstructionist. Schumer keeps his caucus together and delivers all 50 members as yeas.
8) Meantime, another internecine battle brews as liberal House Democrats are increasingly turning up the heat on President Biden for not getting the voting bill done. White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki defended the President today.
9) “Those words are a fight against the wrong opponent,” said Psaki.
10) In other words, Manchin’s vote and compromise inoculates the President from internal criticism from his left flank. They delivered all 50 Democratic votes. There’s not much more the President can do unless someone can cajole 10 Republicans to come around.
11) Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) described today’s vote as “round one” for the voting bill. But when asked what was “round two,” Schumer really didn’t offer a path forward. He offered a vague statement about having more discussions and not “putting the cart before the horse.”
12) Which brings us back to one key: the future of the filibuster.

If all 50 Democrats can stick together, they could lower the threshold for changing the filibuster – with a tie-breaking vote by Vice President Harris.
13) So while today’s events didn’t alter much, it did return the Senate to the debate about the filibuster and the nuclear option. It also revealed the limits of the Dems power in a 50/50 Senate

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chad Pergram

Chad Pergram Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChadPergram

22 Jun
1) The Senate is likely to kill S.1, the Democrats voting rights bill today. 

The Senate won’t take a straight, up/down vote on the measure. Today’s vote is procedural just to begin debate on the legislation. The measure needs 60 yeas to trigger debate.
2) It is expected to fail, thus stymieing even consideration of the measure on the floor. 

We don’t expect that vote until later in the day. 

Today’s vote likely reveals the limits of the Democratic majority in a split Senate.
3) Moreover, this begins to underscore how Democrats may have run out the string on their legislative agenda.

Today’s failed procedural vote will also amplify discussion about altering the filibuster.
Read 8 tweets
10 Jun
A) Congressional Progressive Caucus: Rep. Omar is a deeply valued member of the Progressive Caucus. Her voice is critical and necessary, both in the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the House Democratic Caucus as a whole.
B) Progressive Caucus: We cannot ignore a right-wing media echo chamber that has deliberately and routinely attacked a Black, Muslim woman in Congress, distorting her views and intentions, and resulting in threats against Rep. Omar and her staff.
C) Progressive Caucus: We urge our colleagues not to abet or amplify such divisive and bad-faith tactics.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jun
A) Dem Reps Schneider, Auchincloss, Deutch, Frankel, Gottheimer, Luria, Manning, Nadler, Phillips, Schrier, Sherman & Wasserman Schultz on Dem MN Rep Omar: "Equating the United States and Israel to Hamas and the Taliban is as offensive as it is misguided."
B) "Ignoring the differences between democracies governed by the rule of law and contemptible organizations that engage in terrorism at best discredits one’s intended argument and at worst reflects deep-seated prejudice."
C) "The United States and Israel are imperfect and, like all democracies, at times deserving of critique, but false equivalencies give cover to terrorist groups. We urge Congresswoman Omar to clarify her words placing the US & Israel in the same category as Hamas and the Taliban"
Read 5 tweets
9 Jun
1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide to How A Fight Over the Debt Ceiling Could Ruin Your Summer
Bananarama may have sang about “Cruel Summer” with their 1980s hit. But they may as well have been writing about the avalanche of legislative Rubik's Cubes which away Congress this summer.
2) Police reform. Infrastructure. A host of bills on Democratic priorities ranging from guns to voting rights. These issues are complex enough and far from resolved. In fact, many of the core Democratic initiatives will likely fail in the Senate.
3) And then, there is the debt ceiling.

The debt ceiling resides in an entirely different Kingdom/Phylum/Class/Order/Genus/Species when compared to other legislative tussles.
Read 20 tweets
8 Jun
A) Keep in mind why Biden is ditching talks w/Capito now. The House Transportation Committee is marking up its surface transportation bill tomorrow. Democrats are going to have to get his own party on board 1st. Some liberals were skeptical of GOP talks.
B) That bill from the House committee will be seen as a potential placeholder for an eventual infrastructure bill. Democrats have to walk a very fine line between courting JUST ENOUGH Democrats and then entertaining potential GOP entreaties.
C) Dems still have to align all Dems on their side in the Senate. That means moderates like Sinema, Manchin & Tester & liberals like Sanders.
Read 5 tweets
8 Jun
1) WH's Psaki says Biden "informed Senator Capito today that the latest offer from her group did not, in his view, meet the essential needs of our country to restore our roads and bridges, prepare us for our clean energy future, and create jobs."
2) Psaki: The President also spoke with Senators Sinema, Cassidy, and Manchin today. He urged them to continue their work with other Democrats and Republicans to develop a bipartisan proposal that he hopes will be more responsive to the country’s pressing infrastructure needs
3) Psaki: The President said that he would be in contact with members of the group by phone while in Europe, and he designated his Jobs Cabinet and White House aides Steve Ricchetti, Louisa Terrell, and Brian Deese to meet with them in person to advance this effort.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(