The MTA has a HUGE reservoir of obsolete workers that could be driving subways: conductors. If Albany had any interest in good service, they could change the Taylor Act and allow the MTA to reassign conductors to drive trains
Cuomo's had three opportunities to do this, every time the TWU contracts expire (twulocal100.org/contracts-taoa…). Two lines (L and 7) now have automatic train operation – the "operators" on those lines are barely doing anything, there's no reason to have conductors too
It’s the Taylor Law, Triborough Amendment specifically, which bars the MTA from changing contract terms (including keeping the obsolete position of subway conductor) even upon expiration w/o union agreement. The union’s “power to…enforce” comes from Triborough Amendment
The TWU believes they’d win a strike over cutting conductors…I don’t think they would. European transit unions strike all the time, and it doesn’t work to maintain obsolete positions and inefficient work practices as well as New York’s no-strikes-no-contract-changes system
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Re: Will’s piece, one thing that’s surprised me in doing research on NYC’s 1916 zoning code for a person project is that there really isn’t even a hint of anti-Black racism in it. It’s all class bias and anti-Jewish garment worker stuff. I’m not quite sure what to make of that
I looked high and low for people like Ed Bassett saying racist things. You can find a LOT of inhumane ways that people referred to immigrant garment workers swarming Fifth Ave., but the intense changes roiling Harlem don’t seem to be on anybody’s radar
The closest we get is when, in I believe 1920, Ed Bassett writes (arguing for more open space on private lots), "shall all of Greater New York become gradually Harlemized—in the sense of solid apartment house construction?" At most, a wink, and years after the code was passed
It was going to change anyway. Rent freezes were justified by rising rents on deregulated units covering higher total operating costs. But post-2019, no more deregulation...so stabilized tenants cannot depend on market-rate tenants to shoulder the whole burden of higher expenses
Rent hikes are also about to get way more complicated. Stabilized buildings in Chelsea and the Bronx are very different – in Chelsea, there are lots of market-rate units to cross-subsidized stabilized ones. Not in the Bronx. How is the Rent Guidelines Board going to handle that?
The rational way to handle it would be to, during hot markets when market-rate rents are rising, give owners of buildings that are fully stabilized with no market-rate units higher increases than owners with market-rate rents to cross-subsidized the stabilized ones
Old school Jane Jacobs-style “build where the poorer people live.” Love the unreconstructed NIMBYs like Lynn Ellsworth…most NIMBYs talk the talk, but she’s walking the walk and preserving that old-timey NIMBYism in her very own heart
I didn’t think Lynn was ever going to be able to top her tweet about how awful Singapore is at the height of the pandemic, but I guess she realky takes Pride in her NIMBYism and was saving an extra spicy take for us this month
Since people keep asking: if I lived in Manhattan, I'd vote for Mark Levine for borough president. He was the most supportive about rezoning SoHo: cityandstateny.com/articles/polic…
Oh – Elizabeth Caputo also seems very supportive of new development. So I'd rank her as well for sure: citylimits.org/2021/06/17/man…
Ben Kallos and Brad Hoylman have been awful on issues of development, don't rank them. Hoylman in particular is a huge hypocrite – owns a massive Fifth Ave. apartment and earns ~$100k a year from his in-law's real estate business, but opposes new housing in Manhattan. Awful
I’ve gotten so quick with the block button and it feels great. My new thing is blocking anybody I don’t recognize who tweets at me some variation on “you’re wrong” without making any argument as to why. The best part is that their tweet disappears immediately from my mentions
I blocked three or four people just from the Seattle/Houston tweet alone! I’d like to imagine every one of them screenshot the block with some variation on “not so into the free market of ideas I guess”
I used to agonize over blocking people. If they follow me, I’d worry about losing followers. I’d search all their tweets at me to see if they’d ever tweeted anything worthwhile in the past. I’d mute instead of blocking. No more of that! Just block, block, block