thefreelibrary.com/Alberta%27s+Me… "In 1977 a class action and an action by the Alberta Federation of Metis Settlements (the Federation) were commenced against the Province; the actions were eventually joined. Some $30 million dollars was sought for lost subsurface resource revenues."
See this hurts my goddamn head, I know I am not a lawyer but if a Metis in Alberta can sue Alberta using the Metis definition from the Metis Settlement Act for Mineral Rights, and that makes them Metis, tell me why in Canada to go to College, one needs to meet the MNC Metis
definition? When it fact it was Native Council of Canada who repatriated Metis into the constitution to begin with? Can anyone explain that to me? Constitutional meeting not a complete failure-MNC definition not approved by NCC March 1984- New Breed.
@GovCanada @CrownIndigenous
@GovCanada @CrownIndigenous
@CongAboPeoples @NativeLawCentre @IndigenousON The Ontario Métis- characteristics and identity-by Evelyn Peters, Mark Rosenberg, & Greg Halseth 1991- NCC has rejected MNC's definition of Metis, because the MNC's definition is a contemporary term that only applies to their own
members through the bylaws of their membership. / A History of the Legislative Assembly of Assiniboia - Norma Hall PHD, Clifford P Hall and Erin Verrier.- census conducted in 1870 at Red River - individuals who were descended however remotely either by father or mother from any
ancestor belonging to any one of the native tribes of Indians, and also descended, however remotely from an ancestor among the whites, identified as a half-breed on the English forms and Metis on the French forms. So why you trying to pull this bullshit move on other Indigenous
people who also would like to be able to get Indigenous services at college and an education?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
