EFF Profile picture
24 Jun, 5 tweets, 2 min read
This is an important victory for the free speech rights of public school students. We’re pleased that the Supreme Court recognized that public school officials are sharply limited in punishing students’ off-campus speech, even when it is vulgar.
washingtonpost.com/politics/court…
The Court also rightfully declined to give lesser protection to students’ speech on social media. This is critical, given that public school students, like most young people, use social media to engage in a wide variety of self-expression, political speech, and activism.
In our brief, we wrote that “social media is a central means for young people to express themselves, connect with others, and engage in advocacy surrounding issues they care about.” Justice Breyer acknowledged this in the Court's opinion: A snippet from the opinion. It reads: "the school itsel
We asked the Court to “limit[] the ability of public schools to reach into and regulate the private lives of students.” Justice Breyer noted this fact: "regulations of off-campus speech, when coupled with regulations of on-campus speech, include all the speech a student utters". A snippet from the opinion. It reads, "rfom the student
Read more about why we filed an amicus brief in the case here: eff.org/press/releases…

Thanks also to @aclupa and @ACLU for their important work to protect the free speech rights of public school students.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with EFF

EFF Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EFF

14 Jun
#BroadbandForAll is not only about online connectivity but it's also a job creator! It's a needed solution across sectors that impacts our health, education, jobs, and even remote family visits with elders. @CAGovernor @Rendon63rd @SenToniAtkins @NancySkinnerCA #BroadbandCantWait
In California, Gov. Newsom proposed $7B for broadband that the legislature should vote into action now to start closing the digital divide. We don't have time to waste anymore. #BroadbandForAll #CABudget #BroadbandCantWait @CAGovernor @Rendon63rd @SenToniAtkins @NancySkinnerCA
Sacramento set aside $7B to build high capacity broadband infrastructure for all, but might vote tomorrow to "think it over." CA's largest 5 foundations @calfund @TSFF @siliconvalleycf @sd_fdn @eastbaycf support entire investment w/out delay #BroadbandForAll #BroadbandCantWait
Read 4 tweets
9 Jun
At last, we've got the option to make our friends list private in @Venmo. Here's how to lock down your account, in 8 quick steps:

1: Tap the three lines in the top right corner, select Settings near the bottom. From the settings screen, select Privacy, then Friends List.
2: The settings will look like this by default. Change the privacy setting to Private. If you do not wish to appear in your friends’ own friends lists—after all, they may not set theirs to private—click the toggle off at the bottom. The final result should look like this.
3: Back on the Privacy settings page, make sure your Default privacy settings look like this: set your default privacy option for all future payments to Private.
Read 9 tweets
4 Jun
Colombia's #ParoNacional protests have highlighted main concerns for protecting the ability to use technology and the internet to speak up and organize.

@CIDH’s visit to Colombia to observe human rights violations must also consider these restrictions. web.karisma.org.co/una-peticion-p…
.@Karisma and other groups have pointed to three urgent concerns:
1: The official narrative criminalizing those who protest online as “digital vandals” carrying out “digital terrorism" nacla.org/news/2021/05/1…
2: The use of technical and legal capacities to block Internet access and protest-related content netblocks.org/reports/intern…
Read 4 tweets
19 May
Are you tasked with defending your colleagues' devices from ransomware? We've created this handout and phishing art critique activity as part of our free Security Education Companion resource. Some excerpts below. sec.eff.org/materials/malw…

(1/5)
Some definitions of malware and phishing from our sec.eff.org malware handout

(2/5) MALWARE, short for maliciou...
Common ways malware is installed, from our sec.eff.org malware handout

(3/5) COMMON WAYS MALWARE IS INST...
Read 5 tweets
14 May
We are calling on the California legislature to approve Governor Newsom's just-announced $7 billion investment in public broadband infrastructure, which would give California one of the largest public broadband fiber networks in the country. eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
Laying infrastructure like this brings terabits of broadband capacity to unserved and underserved communities throughout the state. This plan will dramatically lower the cost to the communities themselves, who are in charge of developing their own, locally appropriate plans.
As we’ve noted in the past, national private ISPs have proven themselves unwilling to tackle the rural and low-income urban fiber challenge. It is time to embrace local options.

eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
Read 4 tweets
27 Apr
Along with @ACLU, we have asked the Supreme Court to hear our challenge to the @DHSgov practice of warrantless and suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronic devices at international airports and other ports of entry. This case is years in the making: eff.org/press/releases…
In Riley v. California (2014), a landmark victory for digital privacy, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment requires police officers to get a warrant before searching the cell phones of arrestees. eff.org/document/amicu…
In Riley, the Court reasoned that we have extraordinary privacy interests in the massive amount of sensitive information we carry in our cell phones. caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-cou…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(