Well, in my curiosity about “Free Britney,” I listened to Blackout and Britney Jean last night.
When I thought they were satiric social commentary I thought they were genius. When I realized they weren’t, my enthusiasm for the albums dampened.
But Britney should have justice.
When I thought they were satiric social commentary I thought they were genius. When I realized they weren’t, my enthusiasm for the albums dampened.
But Britney should have justice.
None of us know the real situation of Britney Spears’ mental health. She should have a fair and free hearing.
But it does seem obvious how misogyny and media shading could have played a role in where she is now.
And no one should have a coercive IUD. That’s immoral and tragic.
But it does seem obvious how misogyny and media shading could have played a role in where she is now.
And no one should have a coercive IUD. That’s immoral and tragic.
When Dave Chappelle had a mental health situation and quit the Chappelle Show, he wasn’t judged through the “hysterical unbalanced starlet” lens that Britney seems to be saddled with.
And Michael Jackson may well have benefited from guardianship. Remember the dangle?
But insofar as I recall, it wasn’t on the table. (Was it? I might remember wrong?)
But insofar as I recall, it wasn’t on the table. (Was it? I might remember wrong?)
Before @HenryWFowler corrects me, "a coerced iud."
the device itself is incapable of the act of coercion.
the device itself is incapable of the act of coercion.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
