The purpose of the stress test is to determine
"...whether bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets are sufficiently capitalized to absorb losses during a hypothetical recession...
2/9
...ensuring that they can continue to be able to lend to households and businesses."
What does it mean for a bank to be "sufficiently capitalized" you ask? Well, it means the difference between a bank's liabilities (what banks owe)...
3/9
...and assets (the worth of things the bank owns) is POSITIVE and not NEGATIVE.
19 banks participated in this round of stress tests.
(see below)
4/9
I do not pretend to be an expert on how the Fed models work, what "sufficiently capitalized" means for each bank (meaning HOW MUCH in the black must each bank be, though page 10 lays that out, I still don't under stand it).
5/9
All I wanted to highlight is that the ASSET side of the ledger is all sorts of complicated since mortgages and debt instruments are all VARIABLE in a scenario where the economy tanks.
Meaning the asset side of the ledger can deflate FAST.
6/9
So, which asset is the bank's favorite to keep capital ratio's good for stress test purposes?
Why, US Treasuries of course!!! During downturns, those still pay off at the rate purchased. They are liquid, reliable, and the best collateral ever.
7/9
Important to note that Bank Reserves are not counted in the stress test.
I SAY AGAIN, BANK RESERVES ARE NOT COUNTED IN THE STRESS TEST.
8/9
That matters since MANY still believe that LOTS OF BANK RESERVES mean the banks are likely to lend.
They will not. The reserves DO NOT protect banks during the stress tests.
Banks want those treasuries. Bad. Real bad.
9/fin
Anyway, happy Thursday everyone.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I had a great time listening to @GeorgeGammon and @SantiagoAuFund most recent conversation regarding the Dollar, Dollar Milkshake, and inflation/deflation.
A few quick thoughts and comments on my part.
1/18
The Dollar Milkshake theory is right. The central idea is the dollar (world reserve currency) will remain strong relative to other currencies for a long time UNTIL it will spike and go REALLY high. This will draw money into US equities and Gold.
2/18
Recently (June 2020 to the present) the dollar has weakened. This has lead some (@HedgeyeTV being the principal voices on twitter lately) to make fun of Brent as being wrong or old or dumb or something.
I believe this is a critical observation to incorporate into policy and commercial decision making. From the report:
"The low in inflation occurred after all of the past four recessions...
2/25
"...The low in inflation occurred after all of the past four recessions, with an average lag of almost fifteen quarters from the end of the recessions."
This is an empirical claim that is either true or false. Other economists like @EconguyRosie have confirmed...
Mike: 'You alluded to this earlier. We saw high yield and IG CDS, are the spreads between rates and corporate credit, collapse much more quickly than we saw on the equity side...
2/12
...We obviously know the Fed played a direct role in that by stepping forward and as you pointed out, supporting it, but what are the implications of that dynamic? How does that create opportunity, or does that push us further towards the ultimate Minsky moment?"
"As a result of the deteriorating increase in our standard of living, we have caused not just in the United States, but globally, a major deterioration in the demographics during this period of high indebtedness."
-Lacy Hunt
2/13
I had never connected Federal Reserve and Treasury policies having a DIRECT effect on demographic deterioration.
"And what effect this would have long term on home
ownership rates, on headship rates, on household formation."
I have started doing the homework that Lacy Hunt mentions in this conversation. I found (I think) the 1934 Irving Fisher paper on highly indebted nations. Just thought i would drop this little paragraph. ITS SCARY HOW THIS APPLIES RIGHT NOW.
"23. The chief interrelations between the nine chief factors may be derived deductively, assuming, to start with, that general economic equilibrium is disturbed by only the one factor of over-indebtedness, and, in particular...
3/