How come that:
in the Age group>50: 88% of the cases have been found in the vaccinated group?
Must be higher than the vaccine uptake in that age group.
IFR significantly higher in Vax than in NoVax group.
Not for >50
Is this Vaccine Enhanced Disease (VED) that was warned about?
88% of the cases in the vaccinated group definitely destroys the case of the discriminating and blackmailing vaccine passports!
One of the ugliest governmental laws ever introduced.
Conclusion:
- Transmission not reduced at all (88% in vaxxed group)
- You are not saving grannies
- You are not doing it for 'another'
- V@x passports are discriminatory and nonsense because spread continues
-You only vax for yourself with not much benefit if <60 and healthy.
the VED effect can not be concluded out of this table in my opinion.
It is distorted because of the fact that the unvaccinated people are much more often in the <50 group, which have a much smaller risk to die of Covid19.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Serious problems.
'staff shortages'
But many pilots and attendants sitting at home because of significantly reduced flight schedule, right.
Do people believe this?
Staff having blood clots issues after v@x?
We need transparency.
Blood clots can form in the deep veins (veins below the surface that are not visible through the skin) of your legs during travel because you are sitting still in a confined space for long periods of time.
many who follow me are on the right way, but from my perspective are working from wrong assumptions.
Can we stop talking about 'transmission' and 'variants' until this has been proven?
SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated and the genome is around 50% or more computer simulated.
'Variants' are just the same disease with the same symptoms but then they find different RNA code and use even more interpretation and simulation to overlay this on the already simulated genome.
'Variants' are to scare us, i.e. Scariants.
'Transmission' is also not proven.
They call it 'transmission' when people get the disease, were in proximity, and both test positive for only a small part of the RNA code (often only 1-2 target genes)
Why was it not the conditions the 2 people were in?
Important!
Weinstein, Kirsch, and the inventor of mRNA technology, Dr. Malone, discuss the Japanese Pfizer documents recently released by FOIA. mRNA-lipid nanoparticles spread throughout the body and concentrating in various organs including the brain, ovaries, and spleen.
If you want children, I think you really should await more safety data.
Here the original document surrounding this data which was obtained by a Freedom of Information Request by Canadian virologist Byram Bridle in Japan.
In my opinion there's enough evidence by now that non-pharmaceutical interventions don't really have effect. masks, lockdowns, excessive cleaning, etc.
Reducing human contact seems so logical,
but doesn't seem to work.
Time to rethink virology
There can be 2 (or more) reasons for that:
- Transmission is mostly by the very infectious (and thus with significant symptoms). They stay at home anyway.
- Terrain theory. We create the virus from within. They're exosomes with a corresponding RNA code
Virology is based on many assumptions.
Never has a virus been completely purely isolated w/o other genetic material.
Is virology as we know it actually based on the correct assumptions?
If it is, why don't these measures help?
Is human to human transmission actually proven?
RIVM says that this doesn't have an effect on the number of positives, which obviously is a lie. The test gets more strict when more (specific) target genes are added.
They only test on the non-specific E-Gene and then assume to have found SARS-CoV-2.
"We are inviting the athletes and participating delegations of the upcoming Olympic and Paralympic Games to lead by example and accept the vaccine where and when possible."
"By taking the vaccine, they can send a powerful message that vaccination is not only about personal health, but also about solidarity and consideration of the wellbeing of others in their communities."
Solidarity and wellbeing of others?
Does it prevent infection and transmission?
There is currently no substantive data are available related to impact of Pfizer BioNTech vaccine on transmission or viral shedding.
In the meantime, we must maintain and strengthen public health measures