Thread: Spending time this week exploring overconfidence in AI systems doing machine learning. It’s a thing: AI systematically overestimates the chance its judgments are correct. Fascinating. Leading causes: 1/5

forbes.com/sites/kareemsa…
1.Machines have trouble when new stimuli range outside of what was in its training set. A system set up to tell cats from dogs categorized the researcher’s human face as a dog with 98% confidence! 2/5
jramkiss.github.io/2020/07/29/ove…
2.Machines are overconfident when trained on little data. Turns out a little learning is a dangerous thing, after all, even for your neural net. 3/5
api.deepai.org/publication-do…
3.Machines with high capacity “overfit” their predictions to the idiosyncratic quirks of their training data. When moving to new data, that misleads. Low capacity machines don’t have the wherewithal to do that as much. 4/5
arthurdouillard.com/post/miscalibr…
Solutions in general suggest mixing up and corrupting the training data. Throw in a few curves and make it less clean. Echoes what works in human education: Inject desirable difficulties into training. 5/5
bold.expert/desirable-diff…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Dunning

David Dunning Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @daviddunning6

20 Apr 20
Are the “rich, powerful, or famous … more likely to fall prey to Dunning-Kruger.” I’d say “no.” We all are vulnerable and just as opinionated, but some of us are more likely to have our opinions broadcast over cable TV, newspapers, and social media. That said… 1/n
people with some training that has illusory relevance to public health may misapply that training unwisely into epidemiology. A mathematician will plot growth curves, missing important known facts about disease spread. … 2/n
A lawyer with an informal familiarity with evolution will misapply evolutionary principles where they do not hold. And an economist will see an economic crisis without thinking beyond to the health and human dimensions contained in a medical crisis … 3/n
Read 7 tweets
18 Jan 20
Reminded today is the 20th anniversary of the NYTimes article that started all the Dunning-Kruger hullaballoo. Apologies for the indulgence of this thread. #DunningKruger 1/n
nytimes.com/2000/01/18/hea…
Erica Goode @egoode of the NYT had called me up a month earlier, having read the title of Justin’s and my 1999 paper. Could she call me back after she read it? “Um, sure…” 2/n.
avaresearch.com/files/Unskille…
@egoode On Jan 18, 2000, I walked to a party store from our sabbatic house in Ann Arbor, knowing that the article would arrive on a “science section” Tuesday. And there it was. I phoned my secretary at Cornell at 9am to warn her that there might be one or two reporter calls. 3/n
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(