Now: AG Garland announces DOJ is suing Georgia over new voting restrictions that the government alleges were adopted with the purpose of violating the rights of Black voters.

"Where we believe the civil rights of Americans have been violated, we will not hesitate to act."
Garland notes today marks the 8th anniversary of Shelby County, the SCOTUS ruling that struck down a key part of the Voting Rights Act, Section 5, which required certain jurisdictions (incl. GA) to get preapproval before enforcing voting changes. He urges Congress to restore it.
Garland says he doesn't believe GA would have been able to adopt the voting restrictions now at issue in the latest federal lawsuit if the preclearance system under Section 5 was still in effect
Garland also announced new initiatives aimed at responding to the increase in threats against election officials — a directive to prosecutors/FBI highlighting these threats and prioritizing investigations, and a new cross-division task force
Asked what DOJ's suit brings beyond the seven lawsuits already pending over the GA law at issue, AAG Kristen Clarke says they looked "carefully" at the law and determined there was an "important federal interest to protect" — making sure all voters have equal access to the ballot
Story, with much more to come, on DOJ's announcement today of a new federal lawsuit challenging Georgia's latest voting restrictions. They gov't contends they're intended to violate the rights of Black voters: buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
A notable moment for Garland taking aim at SCOTUS for the Shelby County decision, which struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act eight years ago today — something he could not do publicly in his old job as a DC Circuit judge buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Here's the memo from DAG Lisa Monaco making it a priority for DOJ to identify, investigate, and prosecute threats against election officials and volunteers: justice.gov/file/1406286/d…

"We will promptly and vigorously prosecute offenders..."

Story: buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
DOJ's lawsuit will challenge sections of Georgia's SB 202 that:
- shorten the timeline for requesting an absentee ballot
- add an ID requirement
- limit # of drop sites for ballots
- ban distribution of water/food to people as they wait in line buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Just docketed — here is DOJ's lawsuit challenging Georgia's new voting law, SB 202: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2097…

"...the Georgia General Assembly intended to deny or abridge the right of Black Georgians to vote on account of race or color."

Story: buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zoe Tillman

Zoe Tillman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZoeTillman

24 Jun
Judge Carl Nichols will be hearing arguments this afternoon in Dominion's defamation suits against Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Mike Lindell/MyPillow. Per attorney introductions on the line, Powell and Lindell are there in person with their lawyers, Giuliani is not
MyPillow's lawyer (the company has different counsel than Lindell individually) notes that Alan Dershowitz has dialed in remotely b/c he can't travel after a surgery and is on their legal team. Also in court today along with this lawyers is Dominion co-founder John Poulos
Powell's lawyer Howard Kleinhendler is up first. Nichols begins by trying to parse their arg that there couldn't be malice if Powell made claims in the context of her election lawsuits. But Nichols notes Dominion points to certain statements that were outside of what was in court
Read 22 tweets
23 Jun
THRILLED to say hello from the federal courthouse, where I have not been since Nov. 2019 (not counting an ill-advised mat leave visit)! We're anticipating a video feed of the 2p plea hearing for Graydon Young in the Oath Keepers case, and then Anna Morgan-Lloyd's 2:30p sentencing
For Young's hearing, we're in an overflow courtroom with a live video feed. No photos allowed, alas. What I can see: Each of the tables in the courtroom are bordered with glass/plastic separators, everyone is wearing masks, it appears Young is there, in a suit and light blue mask
Judge Amit Mehta has taken the bench, wearing what looked like a black mask (goes with the robe), which he then removed
Read 36 tweets
23 Jun
New: We have the first plea deal in the Jan. 6 Oath Keepers conspiracy case – Graydon Young will be appearing this afternoon in court, more to come
Young was a newer OK member and wasn't described as a leader of the conspiracy, but was accused of being part of the "stack" that went into the Capitol.

He was also charged with tampering with evidence by deleting his Facebook account:
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2079…
Meanwhile, hello from Judge Thomas Hogan's virtual courtroom, where a plea hearing is about to begin in the case of Jan. 6 defendant Robert Reeder — this is another misdemeanor-only case. Reeder, through his lawyer, had contacted the feds early on s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2049…
Read 13 tweets
22 Jun
Hello from Judge Christopher Cooper's virtual courtroom, where another plea hearing in a misdemeanor-only J6 case is about to begin. Defendant is Bryan* Ivey, seen on surveillance video entering through a broken window and assisting others, per govt
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2049…
(*deleted previous tweet that misspelled the defendant's name)
Cooper begins by asking Ivey how he's feeling this morning. Ivey replies, "I'm good your honor"
Read 7 tweets
21 Jun
Now: A judge ruled Black Lives Matter DC and others can't sue Trump, Barr, and other federal officials involved in the clearing of Lafayette Square last summer (except to challenge ongoing restrictions to the area); claims against DC + Arlington survive s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2096…
Story: Trump, Barr, and other federal officials can't be sued over the violent clearing of peaceful protesters from Lafayette Square last summer, a federal judge ruled today buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
The judge found the challengers failed to stitch together enough evidence at this stage of the case to show Trump, Barr, and others conspired to violate the rights of Black people and their supporters, the judge found buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Read 7 tweets
17 Jun
A notable new superseding indictment in the J6 cases — Guy Reffitt is now charged with bringing a semi-automatic handgun to the Capitol: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2094…

His charging docs (see: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2045…) alluded to this, but he hadn't been charged with it until now
Reffitt isn't the first person charged with carrying a gun on restricted grounds that day, there's also Christopher Alberts: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2074…

Per charging docs, both men were on the Capitol grounds, but doesn't appear they went inside the building
When Reffitt spoke to the FBI voluntarily in mid-January, he told them he'd brought a pistol from Texas to DC, but "disassembled it to comply with the law in Washington, D.C." He was first indicted at the end of January and there were no weapons charges
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(