Comments will be brief, will be issuing a written order, because this is a legal analysis.
Smart judge
Acknowledging the pain of the victim's family. I'm guessing that means he's not going to give a sentence at the top end of the range
Not basing my sentence on public opinion. Just applying the law to the specific facts
Here it is
Second Degree Murder: 270 months. 22.5 years.
Based on abuse of position of trust and authority and the cruelty of the act.
The end. That's a significant enhancement for a typical 2d Degree murder. 10 years more.
As @Popehat notes, he won't serve all 22.5 years; based on reports I've seen, the typical rule in Minnesota is inmates serve 2/3 of their sentence in custody, 1/3 on post-release supervision. But I don't know that personally, so look it up
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For fuck's sake, the bill does nothing of the sort. Whatever the merits of the bill, it does nothing even within the same zip code as that. Screenshots to follow
Let's start with the kicker. The bill EXPRESSLY says "of course you can videotape, this isn't changing that"
And then here are the substantive sections - even without that "yes, you can record" paragraph, what part of the new language (the underlined stuff) could have covered that?
This Sheldon Whitehouse thing is really just perfect, isn't it?
Hey, Sheldon: your defense on this one is basically "no, the all-whiteness of my club is based on systemic racism, not a specific rule" which, well, does not make things better
Meanwhile, we have folks on the right pretending to care about racist systems while just making tu quoque arguments.
Guys, guys, you don't have to pretend. You could just actually care
The "anti-LGBTQ bigots" in question routinely certify single LGBTQ applicants as foster parents, and won't certify cohabiting-but-unmarried hetero parents. Whatever you think of their refusal to certify married LGBTQ parents, it's not about bigotry
And yes, their position that those married LGBTQ parents aren't "really married" for their purposes is discriminatory and painful. But they're a catholic organization applying catholic doctrine, and the burden on those parents (who are referred to and certified by another agency)
is relatively small, especially compared to the burden on religion that would obtain in forcing a religious institution to affirm a status their religion rejects.
Tl;Dr for anyone who doesn't follow: while still in office, President Trump directed Kurt Olsen - one of the attorneys for Texas in Ken Paxton's attempt to overturn the election - to push the DOJ to file a Supreme Court complaint seeking to overturn the election
Here, btw, is another email from Molly Michael who worked in the White House, Executive Office of the President, attaching the same seditious complaint
In which Mark fucking Meadows, specifically from his official WH email, sends DOJ a conspiracy theory about german servers and military vote manipulation. Background on the insanity is from this article
The Judge is now patiently trying to get Kleinhandler to understand the difference between saying "I think MLB is wrong about GA voting law" and "I think that means it was bad faith"
Holy shit. Never say "wait a minute, your Honor" to a judge
Kleinhandler just said that MLB was free to cancel the ASG entirely, just not able to move it to a different state