2/ “on one side, you have technology that’s trying to drive prices down. And the only way to essentially stop that is to concentrate control and government more and more and more.
..by printing money (really stealing from people). It concentrates wealth and power on one side.”
3/ “one system has to have more and more corruption and more lies to protect it. And one system is really the truth showing all the time, that thing is causing more people to look and say, ‘what is this?’”
4/ “Now they’re starting to realize that their entire system they live in is based on a fraud and they’re starting to come on.
Once that starts to happen, it just reinforces on itself. And that’s what I think [is] happening.”
5/ “You’re caught in a system that reinforces it all the time.
..there’s many people including fiat economists that actually haven’t chased this all the way down to the ground. They’re just parroting what they’ve thought from somebody else.”
6/ “these opposing forces are getting worse and worse.
when you just think about in a personal relationship..if you trusted somebody and they deceived you and they completely lied to you for their own personal gain, would you trust them again?”
7/ “a whole bunch of Bitcoiners end up looking like they’re wearing tinfoil hats on a whole range of issues, because you have mistrust in the money layer.
And once you have a mistrust in the money layer, as a consequence, you have to have mistrust everywhere else.”
8/ “when you see El Salvador, a lot of people in the traditional media went with ‘highest crime rate’, with very little understanding that crime is a second order derivative of people not being able to pay their bills because there’s a shitty economy.
9/ “that system all around the world forces many people into a life of despair and crime.
So it’s a system problem. It’s not people. People are rational actors in a broken system.”
10/ “El Salvador, Nigeria and a whole bunch of other countries are starting to really take this seriously because it’s bringing on..millions of people into this new economy at a rate that’s increasing faster and faster.”
12/ “And if they really tried to stop it would move underground and it would keep going just like countries that have stopped and or tried to regulate it and everything else, it just moves underground and it actually probably moves faster.”
13/ “I said to a politician in Canada: ‘listen, if government came after this in a big way, I’d just get on a plane. I take my businesses and I move somewhere else because I know what’s coming.’“
18/ “once you see what’s happening here kind of on both systems and you see Bitcoin truly is about empowering people.
Whereas every other system, I wish this wasn’t true, but it’s about power over other people, dominion over other people.”
19/ “If you have an ego going into Bitcoin, you’ve got a problem. [some] people want it to be about them, and it’s not about them, it’s about a monetary layer that removes that from the system.”
20/ “You don’t want heroes of the community. You want advocates..
..then hopefully you just kind of move back to bringing more people on because it’s better for you.
..what matters the most is the holder network effect.”
21/ “And that’s where I think @michael_saylor has been brilliant- astonishing explanations of why you should think of it as a reserve asset. You should be trying to hold it.”
22/ “what an exciting time to be alive. If you think about all of these different changes that are happening at light speed..
and you think that for the first time in human history, you could [have] money [that’s] decentralized and not [under] one person’s control”
23/ “So the world’s changing really fast and for curious people, that kind of, aren’t afraid of that change they want to explore it and say, where does this go? What are the new rules look like? What does that look?
The modern North American city has attempted to reverse centuries of accumulated wisdom by centrally planning complex, adaptive systems without a mechanism to capture and incorporate feedback.
Strong Towns by @clmarohn explores this fiat-fueled phenomena.
🧵
1/ “We have brought forward more than a generation of consumption capacity and, in a classic sense, should anticipate a generation of corrective sacrifice.”
2/ “Growth once served us, but we now serve growth.
Each iteration of new growth comes with enormous future liabilities for local communities, a promise that the quickly denuding tax base is unable to meet.”
Choosing between bitcoin and gold to protect your long-term purchasing power should be an unemotional decision, grounded in logic, with the interests of your future self in mind (a single-player game).
🟠>🟡
Thread.
1/ Gold solved sending value across time.
Bitcoin solves for both time AND space.
2/ Both gold and bitcoin cannot be artificially synthesized.
Satoshi Nakamoto cites 8 references in the Bitcoin white paper. Each one uniquely influencing the design of the Bitcoin protocol.
In this thread we’ll explore what they are and why they’re important.
🔎
0/ First, for context, it’s helpful to understand that the Bitcoin protocol combines several existing tools, technologies and systems in a highly novel way.
1/ ‘b-money’ by Wei Dai is the very first reference listed. Dai was also one of the first people contacted by Nakamoto.
“efficient cooperation requires a medium of exchange (money) and a way to enforce contracts.
I describe a protocol by which these services can be provided.”
This thread is a compilation of selected quotes from @Breedlove22’s interview w/ @lexfridman: Philosophy of Bitcoin from First Principles.
Clocking in at 4hrs, it’s an unbroken chain of logic, crystalizing the importance of Bitcoin as an innovation for society.
0/ Quotes are organized according to the following topics-
(although the conversation spans much more)
1/ “When you look at the system of capitalism or the system of communism, there's ideals. And a lot of people argue that in [it’s] perfect form it would actually be good for the world.
The question is how resilient are they to the corruption of human nature?”
Taken from ‘Economic Facts and Fallacies’ by @ThomasSowell, the Open-Ended Fallacy lays out the dangers of causes, movements and campaigns whose advocates disregard the limited nature of time and resources or the reality of trade-offs.
🧵
1/ “Who could be against health, safety, or open space?
But each of these things is open-ended, while resources are not only limited but have alternative uses which are also valuable.”
2/ “No matter how much is done to promote health, more could be done. No matter how safe things have been made, they could be made safer. And no matter how much open space there is, there could be still more.”