The reborn UFO mania is driving me insane.
It is a symptom of human hubris that we think we must be able to explain everything we see, and if we cannot, then the source must be sinister or other-worldly.
Welcome back to the pre-Enlightenment. 1/nytimes.com/2021/06/25/us/…
As I wrote here, with help by @dweinberger & Alex Rosenberg, we face a crisis of cognition, of a failure of our our powers of explanation regarding neuroscience & machine learning/AI: that which we cannot predict or understand must be of malign origin. 2/ medium.com/whither-news/a…
I'd've hoped journalism might be a torch-bearer for enlightenment, evidence, & exploration. But, no. UFOs are circulation-bait. Especially Fox "News" but also all mass media are falling prone to the supermarket-tabloid sensationalism of the UFO story. video.foxnews.com/v/6261064511001 3/
The hubris of humanity is that we can understand anything. The hubris of journalism is that it can explain anything. That is the seduction of the story in its completeness. If Fox is (and always has been) the Weekly World News, the rest of news is becoming the X-Files. 4/
Humanity--especially its journalists--are loathe to say "I don't know." They prefer "it could be, couldn't it?" Can't journalists see such talk of UFOs in their news is of the exact same root as conspiracy: It could be that blip is an alien, or Hillary Clinton getting pizza? 5/
The key skill of the journalist should be to say what we do *not* know. We do not know what brought the apartment building down. We do not know what that blip is. But that skill is beyond us and our egos. buzzmachine.com/2013/04/22/and…
The curse of journalism is the story, for it demands in its form an alpha and an omega, neatly bounding an arc of narrative. When we don't know we fill in blanks with predictions, presumptions, maybes, could be's. 7/
We don't know what those blips on screens are. End of story. But then there is no story. So the journalists and the braying jackasses on Fox News fill in the story with their imaginings. That ain't journalism. Or sadly, it is, and we need something new that is not journalism. 8/
Journalists should not be telling stories. They should be saying, Here's what we know. Here's what we don't know. And then they should go home and leave the story-telling to novelists, like Twain. 9/
Now I'm going to return to reading Twain's No. 44, The Mysterious Stranger, a most mysterious book in which he tries to explain all this. He never finished the book & didn't send it to the printer. He knew his limits and the limits of stories. 10/
Speaking of UFO clickbait...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Facebook's Trump decision: suspended for 2 years. Best of it is that they will then consult outside experts and consider his behavior and conditions at the time before deciding whether to reinstate. about.fb.com/news/2021/06/f…
Now the hard question is: How does Facebook apply this to other authoritarians?
Facebook says in response to Oversight Board that it will implement fully this recommendation: "Facebook should suspend the accounts of high government officials, such as heads of state, if their posts repeatedly pose a risk of harm." transparency.fb.com/oversight/over…
Richard Stevens, chair of the UNC Board, wants me to share his email with the 300 journalism faculty and deans who signed the letter of protest regarding Nikole Hannah-Jones' appointment to the school. Here it is:1/
I responded that I take this as promising as I hope the board will offer Nikole Hannah-Jones tenure and will be the first to congratulate them. Otherwise, I am sure many schools would leap at the opportunity to hire a journalist of such singular reputation, and ability. 2/
More: I asked Stevens whether the board would vote on tenure. He responded: "Our last board meeting of the academic year was last week and my term as chair & as a board member is ending." I said: "It is a pity that your term ended without the milestone of hiring @nhannahjones."
This is good, as far as it goes. It is written from journalism's perspective without acknowledging media's larger strategy, its moral panic, against technology, playing out not only in print but in lobbying governments. 1/ nymag.com/intelligencer/…
See this paragraph from a proposal I'm working on. 2/
What the titan v. titan storyline misses is the public: "reader" to one side, "user" to the other. The internet gave people too long not heard agency; they are flexing their power and that is what scares the incumbents from media and their conspirators in politics. 3/
Now here's Niall Ferguson on TV making excused for Donald Trump and the pandemic.
As an antidote to the moral panic of Niall Ferguson & Morning Joe about disinformation and social media, please read this paper by @duncanjwatts, @DavMicRot & @markusmobius: "Fake news is a tiny proportion of Americans' information diets." google.com/search?q=measu…
N.B., @JoeNBC, that @BrendanNyhan said *elite* messages are where danger lurks: not your average Facebook post but lies from politicians and that other cable "news" channel that exploit group identity. 1/
What can we do? I'm working on a post arguing that we in media need to provide other paths for belonging: e.g., demonstrating to parents that they share concerns and needs as the start of conversation and journalism, rather than setting groups against each other. 2/
I'm grateful that @BrendanNyhan dismissed glib claims--hmm, wonder where--that Section #230 is the problem. The question is, how can we use Facebook + media to foster constructive paths of belonging and community.