One very simple heuristic that would exponentially increase the rhetorical effectiveness of Labour MPs is to focus on the facts of a given issue and never venture into the meta-discussion of "what does the public think about us talking about this".
Trying to shape public opinion as an opposition party is hard. You need to grab every opportunity to lay out the facts of an issue and draw a clear contrast between your party and the government.
Trying to make some kind of obscure media critique during an interview with the media is a waste of time. And the opportunity cost is huge.
It's like auditioning on X Factor and using your 5 minutes in front of the judges to describe the song you didn't choose.
Just fucking SING!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lord James Bethell, the quintissential aristocratic failson, should not be allowed within 1,000 yards of government, let alone have a ministerial position.
After just 1 year in government, Lord Bethell has already implicated himself in multiple scandals, demonstrating an astonishing lack of integrity.
If you're a journalism or curious citizen looking to use public databases to identify political sleaze in the UK, check out my new tool, Crony Connect*! cronyconnect.com
*Yes, "Crony Connect" is supposed to be a pun on the quiz show "Only Connect".
**Yes, I know it's not as good as @My_Little_Crony... I'm doing my best here! 😅
The purpose of Crony Connect is to bring together a few important databases in one place and search them simultaneously:
i just got my teaching evals from last semester and my students were so niiiice 😭😭
special shout-out to the person who wanted to clarify that i am "funny haha"
i started using "podcast voice" for teaching on Zoom -- which is where you talk softly right into a lapel mic -- and multiple students said it was "relaxing"... success!!
Harvard prez: “On behalf of the Harvard community, I apologize to Dr. Terry Karl for the University’s failure to assure that Domínguez met the conditions of his 1983 sanction. Harvard failed her.”
I am incredibly relieved that the report is finally out. We had to fight for a LONG time to get this review, and it didn't get off to a great start when they spent more time talking to Harvard faculty than to *the women who were sexually harassed*...
I continue to find it incredibly frustrating that the Harvard administration couldn't just butt out and let this be an *external review*. The degree of micromanagement by the deputy provost was insane...
In this piece, I try to take seriously the government’s argument that it was important to use “informal arrangements” in procurement given the urgent need to source PPE.
In response to which I make two points:
1️⃣ The “need for speed” does not mean we should throw basic anti-corruption principles out the window.
2️⃣ Based on the results, it is hard to believe that senior political figures were willing or capable of “pre-vetting” suppliers.