Major new German hydrogen study by @oekoinstitut for @StiftungKlima. Key role seen in industry, electricity system balancing, aviation & shipping. Very limited role for hydrogen in transport and buildings.
@oekoinstitut@StiftungKlima 2/6 Vehicles powered by fuel cells or synthetic fuels are non-competitive compared to battery-electric drives, even in the case of large passenger cars and high mileages. These vehicles could play at best a niche role with very low h2 prices and high electricity prices.
3/6 A somewhat more mixed picture emerges with regard to buses, rail transport and a share of long-distance heavy duty transport; in part, the relevant operating conditions beyond the cost calculation could play a role here.
4/6 Very limited role seen for hydrogen in heating buildings. It is driven by the significantly higher electricity needs of 3.9-5.2 times more than heat pumps.
5/6 This is reflected in the higher total cost of ownership of h2 boilers compared to heat pumps. The right-hand side of the graphic represents heat pumps, the left-hand side h2 boilers. This is despite the sky-high electricity prices in Germany and would change with levy reform.
6/6 The study identifies use cases in buildings where hydrogen could be competitive. Answer: Only if h2 prices are <€1.5/kg.
1/ Many uninsulated homes and buildings are already heated to comfortable temperatures with heat pumps, as shown across multiple case studies, including an uninsulated stone church. isoenergy.co.uk/projects#sort=…
2/ A building loses heat through the walls, the windows and the roof when it is colder outside than inside, as shown by the stylised arrows in the figure in the main post above. The upper panels show an outdoor temperature of 10C, coloured purple, and an indoor temperature of 20C, coloured red.
Energy transition critics often point to primary energy use to demonstrate that it's going to be impossible.
But 72% of the global energy input is currently lost after conversion.
The problem we're trying to solve here is a lot smaller than primary energy use might suggest.🧵
1/ The future energy system will be characterised by a lot more "electricity-only" renewables (mainly solar and wind). Many of the conversion losses are currently due conversion losses at the electricity generation stage. This will no longer be anywhere near as significant in a system dominated by solar and wind.
2/ All end-use sectors will use significantly more electricity. This will result in much higher end-use efficiency and globally could reduce final energy use by up to 40%.
Over the weekend we heard that the UK government was considering scrapping the Clean Heat Market Mechanism (CHMM).
How important is this?
>1/3 of the 2028 heat pump target is supposed to be achieved through the CHMM. Scrapping it leaves a large hole.
A few thoughts in this🧵
1/ Heating is a major contributor to the UK's carbon emissions. Without decarbonising heating it is physically impossible to meet the UK's climate targets. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/61d450eb…
2/ That's why in the 2020 Energy White Paper the UK government committed to "growing the installation of electric heat pumps, from 30,000 per year to 600,000 per year by 2028". gov.uk/government/pub…
1/ First of all there isn't a good description of what a hydrogen based heat pump is in the paper as they define it. A little digging on the website of Sheffield University where the authors are based reveals this:
2/ "In theory, the heat pump would use green hydrogen, made using renewable energy to generate the electricity needed to turn water into oxygen and hydrogen using electrolysis."