Never think that women's desire to marry is based on idealistic love. Women are the pragmatists posing as romantics; it is men who are the romantic idealists – women are the opportunists.
That's not to say women can't love men. It's to say that Love is a bonus to, not the incentive for, a woman to marry.
“Most American women hope to marry, but current shortages of marriageable men — men with a stable job and a good income — make this increasingly difficult.”
I discuss this at length in the Marriage chapter in my latest book, The Rational Male – Religion: amazon.com/dp/B08RZ53G2Y
There is an expectation that men should evolve above their innate biology and condition themselves to find obese women arousing. Yet there is no societal push encouraging women to evolve-above the want of high-value men.
This is a result of women leveraging the Blank Slate to hold social power. Men's mating strategy is presumed to be socially constructed Patriarchy. Women's mating strategy is presumed to be innate, prudent and "correct".
Love is for "broke" men.
Monogamy serves Beta men. Alpha men still get sex, broke or not.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You are not yourself, you are who she’s molding you to be, and eventually you’ll come to believe that it’s in your best interest – indeed, your responsibility – to be who she wants you to be to sustain that neurosis.
You will gradually give up on your family and friends (or
they give up on you), you will drop all ambitions and passions that directly focus on you, and you will abandon any genuine, independent identity you held for yourself, all because these are threats to the neurotic narrative she constructs for herself and lives out.
Open Hypergamy is a marketing campaign. It wont be myself or any other Red Pill writer who unplugs the majority of men. It will be women's unignorable hubris that will make the most men 'aware'.
Don't bother to criticize this. You'll just be "less of a man" if you do.
Resist the reflex to flip the script. “If you reversed the gender this commercial never gets made” is the rage the agency wants to prompt. The goal of this isn’t to sell an item, it’s to prompt “men are insecure” dialogue, which makes it memorable.
It’s better to use this commercial as a proof of concept. If you have a friend who’s resistant to the Red Pill, this is one of those opportunities to ask him pointed questions that illustrate women’s nature.
The "male slut" is not the man who has indiscriminate sex with numerous women, yet remains emotionally aloof. The real "male slut" is the man who declares his love on first sight, who wears his heart on his sleeve, and who too readily engages in grand romantic gestures.
What men need to understand is that when they leap to profess their feelings at the first opportunity, they are viewed by women as being akin to the male version of the woman who doesn't hesitate to make herself sexually available on the first date.
This is the crux of the Simp. He is his own worst enemy and perpetuates his state all the easier in the age of social media.
Women approach love opportunistically. Few ever acknowledge that their only true agency is a depreciating commodity. They believe they should be loved idealistically, but reciprocity is an option based on men’s performance. This only lasts until their sexual market value decays.
She is a perfect example of gynocentric entitlement. Open Hypergamy; openly embracing her transactional mating strategy. Women make rules for Betas and break rules for Alphas. This is her rule for any Beta: you must make 2x my salary and respect my self-entitlement.
This is an egoistic compromise for her: “if I have to settle on a less arousing Beta in the long term my inflated sense of sexual market value demands at least 2x the provisioning I can provide for myself.” Her rules and hubris is only reserved for Beta males.