Please support this action and the complete protection of all old growth natural forest. See the thread below for an explanation.
1) Most old growth natural forest in the world has already been destroyed through clear felling. I want to explain why replanting does not replace these incredible ecosystems, but just creates a deceiving facsimile of what was there previously.
2) Old growth forests are unique habitats. An incredible interlinked habitat develops over many thousands of years. Their soils are unique, as is the incredible fungal networks which lie in the soils of these old growth forests.
3) Most people just think of fungi as the mushrooms they see on the forest floor. They mistakenly think of them like individual organisms such as plants. But mushrooms are just essentially the fruit of a giant underground network of the real fungi.
4) Most of the fungi is actually a mass of fine threadlike structures, the hyphae, known collectively as the mycelium.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypha
5) The soil in a forest is one vast web of many species of fungi, connected to each other, and connected to all the trees in the forest - nicknamed the woodwide web. See the video in 3).
sciencemag.org/news/2019/05/w…
6) Associated with the fungi are different bacteria, in what are known mycorrhizae. This mutualistic symbiosis with fungi and bacteria, gives them almost magical abilities to fix and utilize nutrients with trees, which none could do alone.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza
7) Fungi are central to nutrient recycling in woodlands and especially rainforest. Most people mistakenly think the incredible biodiversity of rainforests is because they are on rich soils. In fact their soils are old and exhausted.
8) Rainforests especially, but also forests at high latitudes rely on incredible nutrient recycling by this woodwide web of fungi and bacteria to support all the life they do.
rainforests.mongabay.com/0502.htm
9) In addition to this is a massive community of invertebrates, all of which interact and are interconnected with all the fungi, bacteria and trees in a gigantically complex ecosystem. Where each species relies on the other.
10) These ecosystems and their soils take thousands of years, tens of thousands of years, even millions of years with tropical rainforests to develop. They don't just emerge in a few hundred years, even if you replant the trees.
11) This is why destroying old growth natural woods is massive ecological vandalism. Sure trees will grow back in decades, hundreds of years. But it would take ten thousand years or longer for the ecosystem which previously existed, to re-assemble.
12) Therefore to the ecologically uneducated, a planted woodland doesn't look that different to the old growth forest which previously existed. Just the trees are a bit younger. But it is not at all like the old growth forest.
13) Sure an ecosystem of sorts will develop, but it will be a poor depauperate version of the rich woodland ecosystem which previously existed on this site.
14) It really does take thousands of years for these rich ecosystems and their soils to regenerate. Many species of old growth woods disperse very slowly and need a continuous woodland cover to spread over long periods of time.
15) The forestry industry, and it really is an industry, prefer the even age of planted woodland with the most profitable timber species, because they can maximise yield and maximise profit. They try to fool the public into believing their planted woodland is the same.
16) Old growth forest and its rich biological tapestry and heritage is a finite resource, and we have lost the vast majority of it. It is absolutely unbelievable in the time of the climate and ecological emergency, that we are destroying what little we have left.
17) Forests are not just carbon sinks, they are important reservoirs of biodiversity.

"We cannot solve the threats of human-induced climate change and loss of biodiversity in isolation. We either solve both or we solve neither."
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
18) Preserving and conserving old growth forest is a means of both sequestering carbon, and halting biodiversity loss.
19) This is why I argue that all old growth natural forest should be protected and we must halt all further exploitation and destruction of this valuable and finite resource. We have very little of it left.
@threadreaderapp please unroll?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

30 Jun
The failure to give this thread much notice or even recognise what I said, massively illustrates the main problem as regards the ecological and climate crisis i.e. that there is virtually no ecological understanding of the crisis we face.
As a society we have become totally disconnected from the natural systems that keep us alive, and there is virtually no understanding of ecosystem processes, what biodiversity is, and how it sustains us and makes our lives possible.
Just a week ago I started a thread on why it is essential to use the term biodiversity for biodiversity, and not nature or wildlife as a euphemism for biodiversity, as they refer to something else and are ill defined terms that mislead the public.
Read 27 tweets
9 Jun
1) Again @GretaThunberg offers some of the most insightful commentary on the climate and ecological emergency. No one sees the big picture any clearer than this. What she says seems deceptively simple, but it is entirely accurate.
2) What I wanted to start this mini thread for is there is now a tendency, to tell individuals what they should do to address the climate and ecological crisis, as if this is the way to address the crisis, and why we have not addressed it i.e. the public are responsible.
3) However, as Greta brilliantly expresses in just a few words, it is impossible for anyone to live a truly sustainable lifestyle in a system controlled by governments which impose an unsustainable system on us.
Read 27 tweets
8 Jun
I was making some audio recordings of a male Common Cuckoo on Whixall this morning and noticed some odd vocalizations, which appeared to be coming from the Cuckoo. The gruff sounds you hear at the beginning and throughout, are coming from the Cuckoo.
xeno-canto.org/655226
The context is I had crept in close, to check it was the male Cuckoo making these sounds. I then saw the male Cuckoo being mobbed by a small songbird (likely a Meadow Pipit) but possibly something else (I didn't have a clear view).
Further to the context, about 10 minutes earlier I'd seen a female Cuckoo come in, following the calling male.

Does anyone know what range of vocalizations male Cuckoos make.
Read 5 tweets
28 May
1) The article Greta highlights is a wonderful exploration of one of the big misconceptions when it comes to woodland generation, and that is you have to plant trees to create woodland.
2) In fact, much or most land, which was formerly woodland, will rapidly revert to being woodland if you just leave it alone and stop managing it or over grazing it. There are some exceptions to this, which I will deal with.
3) Tree planting tends to be done from the motivation point of view of modern commercial forestry, as it creates even age stands of woodland of the same tree species, which makes clear felling easy and commercially more profitable.
Read 27 tweets
24 May
Let me deal with this separately. I did not say this year was the same as last year. I devoted tweets to explaining the subtleties, rather than crude parameters. I will explain the ecological relevance below.
I do a lot of Odonata recording, often getting the first and last records for species for the whole of the UK. 2020 started off with good numbers of Odonata, especially damselflies. There have been very poor survival rates in recent years because of this weather.
Extremely hot days, followed by days where there is very little to no sun at all, is very bad for Odonata and other sun dependent insects, and their populations rapidly decline.
Read 9 tweets
24 May
That isn't what your reference says. It is dated 25 April 2020. Once again, I said April was unusually hot and sunny, followed by a pattern from May onwards of the odd very hot day, followed by a much longer period of dull weather.
I have repeatedly clarified what the weather was actually like. Nothing you have said or linked to has contradicted this. The fact that April was the sunniest month, actually confirms the point I made and doesn't contradict it.
I was making a point about unusual weather patterns persisting. The actual pattern of weather in 2019, 2020 and now 2021 has actually been different. In 2018 it was unusually hot and dry, with day after day of baking hot sunshine.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(