I read the Cosby opinion from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, it's pretty persuasive
Bruce Castor publicly announced that he would not prosecute Cosby as a way of forcing him to testify in the civil case, unable to assert any Fifth Amendment rights
Then ten years later, Castor's successor went ahead and prosecuted Cosby, based on incriminating testimony that Cosby had given in the civil case
We really don't want a world where prosecutors can bait-and-switch defendants on their Fifth Amendment rights
About That Revolver Story Claiming FBI Agents/Informants Are the Unnamed "Co-Conspirators" in Jan. 6 Indictments redstate.com/shipwreckedcre…
I think this is an important one to get right
While it's likely that both Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were infiltrated by the FBI (they have a history of doing these things), @shipwreckedcrew is very persuasive in explaining that the unindicted co-conspirators wouldn't be feds
It's really easy to get the law wrong, I'm a lawyer and have done it plenty, and so I get why Darren/Tucker got out ahead of their skis
That's why it's important to check this stuff with people experienced in federal criminal procedure (which I am not)
We've spent well over a year fighting about masks and social distancing and vaccines
But whatever "mistakes" were made by elected officials on those issues absolutely pale in comparison to the completely catastrophic error that was subsidizing gain of function research
Big Pharma gets endless hate
And yet it was our NIH that funded the research that killed half a million Americans
And the Big Pharma companies that created the vaccines that stopped the bleeding
It turns out that the profit incentive helps scientists stay focused on creating things that people need
And that the lack of a profit incentive leads scientists to build entire bureaucracies around research that could wipe out millions of people