Just realized that England would have been more dangerous in that 1st half if they'd ran the game more through Saka. He simply makes better (micro) decisions than Sterling on the ball (which makes him an equal or better ball carrier) and better suited to receiving and carrying.
So many times Saka took up good positions to receive but the ball never arrived. It looked like someone in the England squad had seen the media attention for Saka and wanted to hog it all for themselves by showing off. It's good in a certain way because it's Raheem Sterling and
not a bum. Saka has to earn his respects in that English super squad and just a few MOTM displays will not do it. It's just how things work in reality when you have quality everywhere like that.
However, tactically, Saka being a primary ball handler would have allowed Sterling
to do the role he's best at doing. Off-the-ball movement, runs in behinds, etc. The moment Grealish came on and Sterling could focus more on his real job. Good carry from him for the goal, though.
Saka could have done that for Sterling, though, but the trust is not yet there.
It is a testament to Saka's quality that despite not being a primary ball receiver/user for England in the first half, he still popped up in dangerous situations (Harry Kane miscontrol, Sterling shot from outside the box that Neuer palmed away) ready to take advantage.
This is what sets Saka apart as a talent: he is also inclined to attack space and make dangerous runs without the ball. He can fulfill the Raheem Sterling role as well. So, today, for instance, had the ball come loose differently, he could have scored an easy goal for the team.
Saka is not yet fully developed as a primary creator from RW and he is already good enough to start for England there. Saka is not yet fully developed as a runner off the ball, and yet he is already good enough to be a considerable threat in that role. Unbelievable quality.
Basically, Saka has not fully developed two primary aspects of his football and yet he already is a top player for club and country. That's the biggest testament of his quality. When you are already a top player halfway through your evolution. It's exciting to project his future.
He probably hits something close to Sancho's numbers for Arsenal in the Premier League at his peak.
Sancho is a terrifying talent on his own. He should have a better peak than Saka if he has the right cast around him but it would be close.
The Bundesliga tax is real and if you closely watch most of Sancho's goals or assists, a majority of them happened in transition play. That's not a bad thing at all, however, almost all of Saka's goals or assists have been against settled EPL defenses. And settled EPL defenses
are incredible. The spaces are so tight and the defenders are so strong. Sancho is going to be a massive success in the EPL nevertheless. However, don't expect him to put up the same silly numbers as in the German league. He can still do it, though, but probably at his peak.
In any case, Sancho or not, Saka will be a world-class winger in his own rights. Problem is that Sancho is a better talent (has all of Saka's qualities + a slightly better creative brain). Saka's super asset is his general mentality, though, and no young talent equals him there.
Pedri is the closest thing to Saka mentality-wise and he is not even at the same level. Saka has every aspect of the head game locked down. That's primarily why he's bound to shock even people who already rate him. His development likely goes supernova because of that head.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
—His general philosophy of adding big amounts of athleticism to the squad, for starters. You can't compete at a top, top level without it, especially in the Premier League. Here's an old quote from The Athletic:
—Ever since he came in, the most solid of all our transfer links (widely reported) have been Gabriel, Partey, Stones, Bissouma, Buendia, Willian, Aouar, Onana, Maddison, White, etc. They are generally (regarded as) pretty good players who mostly (will) improve us.
—Even the sideways Willian signing was pretty much the perfect profile for what Arteta wanted on the wings; creative LW in the halfspaces and wide, play-stretching RW on the flanks. Basically, his targets are specific and planned for a specific system. Means most will work out.
Fans like to complain about everything. I don't really like Ramsdale's profile or whatever we might spend on him. But he's surely not going to be the starting GK and Leno is not going to stay for too long anymore.
Which means that he is a competitive 2nd choice.
There's still space for us to get the top quality GK we need. I don't have to agree with how it's being done or the idea of waiting for Onana on a free. I don't have to like it. But I can surely get behind having a young, HG GK with room to grow as the 2nd choice.
Plus has anyone considered we might be getting Onana for absolutely nothing?
Don't get easily stoked by media reports, my mans.
I have always maintained that if Arsenal get a break (a sugar daddy financier + or a world class coach), they would be one of the most attractive sports brands around, up there with Real Madrid, Barcelona and Manchester United.
Chelsea, despite years of consistent success and the continued decline of traditional top clubs, have not come close to touching the cultural and commercial appeal of a post-Ferguson United because they are fighting for an identity that doesn't belong to them.
I do not claim to know too much but I believe that United own the identity of perennial winners. Chelsea under Abramovich are also trying to base their identity on that. That space is contested in the minds of fans. Even at that, Chelsea lack a distinct footballing style.
Was telling you niggas that he ain't as bad as you were making him out. I insisted that he was tall and actually fast as well. His major problem is that he isn't aerially and physically dominant (because he hasn't added muscle to that frame of his) and goes to ground too often.
His aerial issues and tendency to go to ground often can be fixed by coaching, easy. Don't forget how easily Arteta improves individual defenders. Made Holding look manageable and Mustafi was looking like a good player at some point.
People don't get it. That, after the worst league season for Arsenal in several decades, Mikel Arteta is going to be backed with over 150m in the transfer market says all you need to know about how incredibly rated he is.
Arteta's hive is shut. And we will be ahead of the curve.
Football is a hugely contextual sport. Variance is a norm. But a manager who can instill all of the right fundamentals and keep them will ultimately succeed.
Arteta is the youngest coach in the Premier League and will be one of its best for years to come. It's not a dream.
Rival fans will be wondering how this happened in 2 years time. He will be the next Jurgen Klopp, a reference for trusting the process at other clubs. Even an incompetent Arsenal board will not stop him.