I’m gonna delete this thread because Alex deleted the underlying tweet. But there are two issues here.
One, which the White House is pushing back on very hard, that it agreed to scrap the Jobs Plan measures that aren’t included in the bipartisan deal. (That never made sense.)

Two, that it won’t try to recover the spending *topline* it has conceded in negotiations.
Based on what Manchin has said in recent days, that seems very likely true. And it’s a TON of spending to concede. But if it’s not actually a handshake deal with the GOP negotiators, then it’s a story about internal Dem politics, not about GOP demands per se.
Still a huge comedown, if it holds, from the $4T Biden originally proposed. But less clearly a response to GOP demands as opposed to demands from within the party.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brian Beutler

Brian Beutler Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @brianbeutler

29 Jun
Not to pick on this one piece, but it’s a good example of how Republican bad faith has become the background assumption in so much journalism, rather than a set of behaviors that can and should be questioned.
Like, Republicans could simply not try to do a coverup for partisan gain!
Read 5 tweets
24 Jun
This seems correct, RE the critical race theory propaganda blitz, and should be a reminder that the whole thing is a concoction of the right, built by nutpicking and dissembling about random incidents that have no attachment to national partisan politics.
The asymmetry in how the parties prosecute culture wars reminds me of how this crazy story from almost three years ago just kinda went poof. politico.com/story/2019/08/…
The elite right had taken to blending "Nietzschean philosophy with critiques of contemporary Western society, denigrating homosexuality, Judiasm, Islam, feminism," fixating on "population genetics," and an "affinity for Slavic and northern European cultures." I.e. Nazism.
Read 6 tweets
23 Jun
@davidshor @mattyglesias I think this famous video speaks to the point well.
@davidshor @mattyglesias Trump is widely loathed; even where he polls evenly overall, his detractors absolutely despise him. It’s a source of immense political power, but it often goes untapped.
@davidshor @mattyglesias And even if you think the Trump name is untouchable in swing states, he and the GOP ceded a whole bunch of abstract culture-war terrain to Dems over the years (truth, patriotism, democracy) that is there for the taking.
Read 4 tweets
16 Jun
My main thought here is the concessions to Republicans *have to be contingent on them voting for the bill*, and if they don’t, the filibuster has to go, and ideally those provisions have to go, too. Otherwise this is all just a bunch of suckers wasting each others’ time.
This is just basic negotiating, it’s what Republicans do, and not only that Manchin *knows* this is what they do.
Read 4 tweets
16 Jun
It’s ok I didn’t want to see the records anyhow and it’s not like we have a right to them or that Trump was actually the president for four years, y’know?
Seriously how do they come to this position and not feel completely self-defeated? abcnews.go.com/Politics/summi…
Read 4 tweets
10 Jun
Similar thoughts here. mailchi.mp/crooked.com/bi…

There’s another dimension to this, which is the creation of a false dichotomy between Bold Truth Telling and Lying, as if the craft of writing made it impossible not to engage in Epic Media Lab Leak Fiasco hyperbole without lying.
The lab-leak thing in particular is an example of a line of critique that has a grain of truth to it, but has been exaggerated by critics who are very invested in the appearance of rectitude and not at all invested in whether their overwrought criticisms will spark moral panic.
I’d say intelligent critics have an ethical obligation to consider how their word choices will be exploited by propagandists, which runs right alongside their ethical obligation to tell the truth. Refusing to consider the former is actually a kind of laziness in writing.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(