Really looking forward to reading this new @Profkins book:
"What goes on so often today in white evangelical circles is a misunderstanding. There’s a belief that when it came to the civil rights movement, those white Christians just kind of missed it...
...and unfortunately, this wasn’t a time where we applied biblical ethics to a social situation that was occurring around us...[T] wasn't the story...The story was that these white evs had a different hermeneutical lens that they were using to read Scripture.
[After the Civil Rts Act] ...they're no longer able to openly say, 'Listen, God's a segregationist"...[but] they don't stop believing....they continue to believe that segregation is right...but the way they talk about it changes."
They began to talk about it in terms of colorblindness & individualism & the problem is we have this overbearing government that’s coming in & forcing these changes, & really what we should be doing is treating people not as members of a race, but...as individuals...
and we should just be blind to the racial differences between us....if you understand the genesis of this colorblind argument as being in this moment of warding off integration, colorblindness was not a good faith argument. It was a defensive posturing...
If you understand where this language comes from, you...understand that we shouldn’t be surprised that we’re incredibly racially divided in the Am church, in large pt because these colorblind, individualistic tools that white ev Chrs cling deeply to came from a pd of segregation.
In the same way...this idea that you have to do what’s best for your family, & that God has made you the head of your family...that it’s your Chr duty as a parent to do what’s in their best interest. This...defend[s] the move from integrated public schools to private Chr schools.
Until white ev Chrs begin to grapple with the historical development of colorblindness and individualistic theology, you’re not going to make much progress in actually bringing about this reconciliation that so many of them profess to have when it comes to the issue of race."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kristin Du Mez

Kristin Du Mez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kkdumez

1 Jul
Back in 1983, George Marsden, Nathan Hatch, and Mark Noll warned conservative evangelicals against embracing the myth of Christian America. To do so weakend their public witness & paradoxically contributed to the secularization of Am society. 1/7
patheos.com/blogs/anxiousb…
Misperceptions of the past are stumbling blocks to effective Christian witness. "Positive Christian action does not grow out of distortions or half-truths," they contended. "Such errors lead rather to false militance, to unrealistic standards for American public life today... 2/
...and to romanticized visions about the heights from which we have fallen." Perhaps more perniciously, a mythical view of "Christian America" discouraged "a biblical analysis of our position today." 3/7
Read 8 tweets
1 Jul
Als ehemaliger Austauschstudent nach Deutschland liebe ich das sehr. Vielen Dank @DietzThorsten.
"Warum schlugen diese Bücher so hohe Wellen? Für viele waren die Erfahrungen der Trump-Ära ein Augenöffner...
Dieses Mal gelang es der männlichen Elite des US-Evangelikalismus nicht, sämtliche kritischen Stimmen einfach auszugrenzen als liberal, bibelkritisch etc."
Du Mez und Barr sind keine Außenstehenden. Sie stammen aus dem Evangelikalismus und fühlen sich ihm zugehörig.
Sie bestreiten in keiner Weise, dass es sich bei vielen evangelikalen Gemeinden um fürsorgliche, liebevolle Orte handelt, an denen man die Liebe Gottes und geschwisterliche Gemeinschaft findet.
Read 5 tweets
9 Jun
Stopped by to chat with these two boys, ages 14 & 12. They told me how they’re homeschooled & part of a church w/ a brave pastor who isn’t afraid to be political, how they want to defend Trump and the Constitution, how the election was stolen…
…how they know because of “evidence” from Newsmax, Fox News, and Mike Lindell, and how their parents drop them off on street corners a couple times a week while they run errands.
Posted with permission; they were eager to have their names and photos posted on social media. I explained why I wouldn’t and why I’d use only this photo from a distance. They were very earnest and polite.
Read 4 tweets
7 Jun
“What I came to see after a closer examination of this history is, time & again, religious leaders—conservative evangelical leaders—actively stoked that fear...in the hearts of believers, in order--ultimately, I concluded--to consolidate their own power. Image
“& that we needed to flip that script, that evangelical militancy wasn't necessarily…the response to fear, even though these fears were genuine. Ev militancy…came first & then required the continual stoking of fear in hearts of followers…to justify & sustain that militancy."
“It's very easy for any of us to justify the pursuit of power in order to do what we think is good and right and true, and I think it's very hard for us to be self-critical and to interrogate...what we're doing in God's name, in particular.
Read 4 tweets
7 Jun
Back to favorite reviews, gearing up for tomorrow's pbk release. I've been grateful for such enthusiastic responses from an array of academic disciplines. First off was @Matt_A_Sutton's beautiful review in TNR. As long as Sutton likes it, it's all good.
newrepublic.com/article/158539… Image
Then Yale's distinguished historian Jon Butler weighed in:
cambridge.org/core/journals/… Image
And from the discipline of philosophy, who could forget @michaelreaND's showstopping piece over at @Salon: salon.com/2020/09/09/how… Image
Read 4 tweets
21 May
I’ve been tagged in this a lot, so a couple thoughts. First, yes, shame on @Zondervan.
But what’s fascinating to me is the denial here that any of this is political. I run into this often with conservative Chrs who are fiercely political yet see their values as apolitical. 1/
“We noticed the divide in the public where some people started seeing pro-American images like the flag, the bald eagle, the statue of liberty as weaponized tools of the Republican party, and we didn’t understand that,” Kirkpatrick said. 2/
Things that prompted this Bible include homeschool parents’ fear that US history isn’t being taught in schools anymore and the removal of monuments in the wake of BLM protests.
But no, nothing political here: 3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(