Back in 1983, George Marsden, Nathan Hatch, and Mark Noll warned conservative evangelicals against embracing the myth of Christian America. To do so weakend their public witness & paradoxically contributed to the secularization of Am society. 1/7 patheos.com/blogs/anxiousb…
Misperceptions of the past are stumbling blocks to effective Christian witness. "Positive Christian action does not grow out of distortions or half-truths," they contended. "Such errors lead rather to false militance, to unrealistic standards for American public life today... 2/
...and to romanticized visions about the heights from which we have fallen." Perhaps more perniciously, a mythical view of "Christian America" discouraged "a biblical analysis of our position today." 3/7
By conflating a certain understanding of Am history with scriptural revelation, proponents of "Christian America" risked idolizing the nation and succumbing to an "irresistible temptaton to national self-righteousness." 4/7
They also sacrificed any ability to offer a scriptural critique of the cultural values they themselves embraced. This leads to secularization--for "uncritically patriotic Christians" are no longer able to articulate a prophetic critique of their own culture. 5/7
What is a Chr understanding of the nation? Rejecting any notion that the US is God's chosen nation. God's people are strangers & pilgrims. A nation's righteousness should not be judged by religious professions but by the extent justice for the oppressed is realized in society. 6/
Pretty sure none of these guys were influenced by CRT, by the way. 7/7
Also, @robertpjones and I will be discussing these issues and more this evening, together with @AmandaTylerBJC. Tune in and join in the conversation:
We recommended a lot of books during yesterday’s discussion, so here’s a list (as far as I can remember!). First off, @agordonreed’s fabulous new book On Juneteenth. bookshop.org/books/on-junet…
Als ehemaliger Austauschstudent nach Deutschland liebe ich das sehr. Vielen Dank @DietzThorsten.
"Warum schlugen diese Bücher so hohe Wellen? Für viele waren die Erfahrungen der Trump-Ära ein Augenöffner...
Dieses Mal gelang es der männlichen Elite des US-Evangelikalismus nicht, sämtliche kritischen Stimmen einfach auszugrenzen als liberal, bibelkritisch etc."
Du Mez und Barr sind keine Außenstehenden. Sie stammen aus dem Evangelikalismus und fühlen sich ihm zugehörig.
Sie bestreiten in keiner Weise, dass es sich bei vielen evangelikalen Gemeinden um fürsorgliche, liebevolle Orte handelt, an denen man die Liebe Gottes und geschwisterliche Gemeinschaft findet.
Really looking forward to reading this new @Profkins book:
"What goes on so often today in white evangelical circles is a misunderstanding. There’s a belief that when it came to the civil rights movement, those white Christians just kind of missed it...
...and unfortunately, this wasn’t a time where we applied biblical ethics to a social situation that was occurring around us...[T] wasn't the story...The story was that these white evs had a different hermeneutical lens that they were using to read Scripture.
[After the Civil Rts Act] ...they're no longer able to openly say, 'Listen, God's a segregationist"...[but] they don't stop believing....they continue to believe that segregation is right...but the way they talk about it changes."
Stopped by to chat with these two boys, ages 14 & 12. They told me how they’re homeschooled & part of a church w/ a brave pastor who isn’t afraid to be political, how they want to defend Trump and the Constitution, how the election was stolen…
…how they know because of “evidence” from Newsmax, Fox News, and Mike Lindell, and how their parents drop them off on street corners a couple times a week while they run errands.
Posted with permission; they were eager to have their names and photos posted on social media. I explained why I wouldn’t and why I’d use only this photo from a distance. They were very earnest and polite.
“What I came to see after a closer examination of this history is, time & again, religious leaders—conservative evangelical leaders—actively stoked that fear...in the hearts of believers, in order--ultimately, I concluded--to consolidate their own power.
“& that we needed to flip that script, that evangelical militancy wasn't necessarily…the response to fear, even though these fears were genuine. Ev militancy…came first & then required the continual stoking of fear in hearts of followers…to justify & sustain that militancy."
“It's very easy for any of us to justify the pursuit of power in order to do what we think is good and right and true, and I think it's very hard for us to be self-critical and to interrogate...what we're doing in God's name, in particular.