Thread by @ClaraJeffery

There is no one I’d rather read a scathing obit of Rumsfeld than from George Packer—one of the best chroniclers of the Iraq War—and this does not disappoint. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…

“ Wherever the government contemplated a wrong turn, Rumsfeld was there first with his hard smile—squinting, mocking the cautious, shoving his country deeper into a hole. His fatal judgment was equaled only by his absolute self-assurance. He lacked the courage to doubt himself. “

“Rumsfeld started being wrong within hours of the attacks and never stopped. He argued that the attacks proved the need for the missile-defense shield that he’d long advocated. He thought that the American war in Afghanistan meant the end of the Taliban….”

“…He thought that the new Afghan government didn’t need the U.S. to stick around for security and support. He thought that the US should stiff the United Nations, brush off allies, and go it alone. He insisted that al-Qaeda couldn’t operate without a strongman like Saddam. …”

“…He thought that all the intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction was wrong, except the dire reports that he’d ordered up himself. He reserved his greatest confidence for intelligence obtained through torture. …”

“…He thought that the State Department and the CIA were full of timorous, ignorant bureaucrats. He thought that America could win wars with computerized weaponry and awesome displays of force.”

“…He believed in regime change but not in nation building, and he thought that a few tens of thousands of troops would be enough to win in Iraq. He thought that the quick overthrow of Saddam’s regime meant mission accomplished…”

“…He responded to the looting of Baghdad by saying “Freedom’s untidy,” as if the chaos was just a giddy display of democracy—as if it would not devastate Iraq and become America’s problem, too….”

“…He believed that Iraq should be led by a corrupt London banker with a history of deceiving the US government. He faxed pages from a biography of Che Guevara to a Army officer to prove that the growing Iraqi resistance did not meet the definition of an insurgency….”

“…He dismissed the insurgents as “dead-enders” and humiliated a top general who dared to call them by their true name. He insisted on keeping the number of US troops in Iraq so low that much of the country soon fell to insurgency…”

“…He focused his best effort on winning bureaucratic wars in Washington.”

Damn

Just want to add that Packer's book on George Holbrooke was one of the best books I have ever read and I am not an FP nor a "great man" biography geek:

https://twitter.com/clarajeffery/status/1156636273559261185?lang=ca