In this thread, I describe a study that compares SARS-CoV-2 vaccine induced antibody immunity to that induced by COVID-19. Also at #virologyblog. (1/n)
Vaccination against the vaccine-preventable diseases is preferable to natural infection because it prevents illness and the long-term effects associated with many infections; and in most cases, it also leads to better immunity. (2/n)
In the case of immunity induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, it is slowly becoming clear that the immunity is of overall better quality than that induced by COVID-19. (3/n)
Vaccination leads to production of polyclonal antibodies, which are derived from many different types of B cells and may target many different portions of an antigen (i.e., “epitopes”). (4/n)
Isolation of B cells from a blood sample allows one to artificially produce monoclonal antibodies, which are derived from a single type of B cell and target a single epitope. (5/n)
Using blood samples from 6 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine recipients and 30 COVID-19 survivors, the authors of a recent publication compared the dynamics of vaccine-induced antibody immunity to those resulting from natural infection. (6/n)
A comparison of total antibodies between the two groups of people revealed that polyclonal antibody levels in vaccinees were generally higher than those in COVID-19 survivors. (7/n)
However, when the authors tested the antibodies from vaccinees for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity, only a minority were neutralizing, including antibodies that target the receptor-binding domain (RBD) on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. (8/n)
To see whether any of the neutralizing antibodies from vaccinees were capable of binding to the RBD, the authors performed competition experiments, where they exposed the antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 RBD alone, or to RBD pre-mixed with its binding target... (9/n)
– the human ACE2 receptor. This revealed that increasing concentrations of ACE2 led to decreased antibody binding, suggesting that the antibodies compete with the ACE2 receptor for binding to the RBD, and that they neutralize the virus by inhibiting its binding to ACE2. (10/n)
A plasmablast is a type of B cell that differentiates from an immature B cell into a mature plasma cell, which can produce large amounts of a specific antibody. (11/n)
Although they are short-lived, plasmablasts also make antibodies, and are typically abundant and easy to isolate from peripheral blood. Analysis of monoclonal antibodies produced from the plasmablasts of vaccinated individuals showed that a substantial number... (12/n)
of these antibodies also bound the N-terminal domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in addition to the RBD, suggesting that these two epitopes co-dominate as antibody targets. (13/n)
“Original antigenic sin” is a phenomenon initially discovered with influenza viruses, where the immune system mounts the strongest response to the first version of one particular antigen encountered (i.e., the first virus variant with which one is infected in life). (14/n)
Similar observations have been made in the context of COVID-19, with natural SARS-CoV-2 infection purportedly also substantially boosting antibodies against seasonal β-coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1. (15/n)
To see if SARS-CoV-2 vaccination produces a similar effect, the authors analyzed the specificity of antibodies isolated from vaccine recipients before and after vaccination against the spike protein of α-coronaviruses 229E and NL63 and β-coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1. (16/n)
Although vaccination did not increase titers of pre-existing antibodies against 229E and NL63 viruses, it did increase titers against OC43 and HKU1, consistent with what happens during natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. (17/n)
These results suggest that some of the vaccine-induced antibody responses may be biased by pre-existing immunity to other circulating human β-coronaviruses. (18/n)
The authors also determined whether plasmablast-derived monoclonal antibodies and polyclonal antibodies from the sera of COVID-19 survivors and vaccinated individuals could bind to the RBDs of different SARS-CoV-2 variants. (19/n)
Although complete loss of binding was rare, antibodies from COVID-19 survivors varied widely in their ability to bind to different variants. Antibodies isolated from vaccinees varied less, depending on the variant. (20/n)
However, for most plasmablast-derived monoclonal antibodies from vaccinees, there was no impact on binding to RBDs in the binding assay used, regardless of the variant. (21/n)
This study raises several interesting points. First, the ability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination to boost pre-existing antibodies against HKU1 and OC43 supports the premise for a universal β-coronavirus vaccine, several of which are already in development. (22/n)
Second, the ability of the RBD and N-terminal domain to co-dominate in eliciting spike-specific antibodies justifies the use of vaccines containing the entire spike protein, rather than just the RBD. (23/n)
Third, although it is surprising that vaccination induced so few neutralizing antibodies, the role of non-neutralizing antibodies in protection against disease and infection is currently unknown. (24/n)
Considering that vaccination is obviously so protective against disease and asymptomatic infection, the authors speculate that the antibodies induced by vaccination could have protective functions outside of neutralization. (25/n)
Lastly, the fact that vaccination-induced antibodies fluctuate little, if at all, in their ability to bind the RBDs of different variants compared to antibodies induced by natural infection... (26/27)
...suggests that vaccination is more likely to protect from different variants than natural infection. Collectively, these findings further highlight the importance of vaccination for ending this pandemic. (end)
Questions about the Johnson & Johnson vaccine? In this post, I describe the composition of the vaccine, the clinical trial results, and how it compares to the other vaccines in use. Also at #virologyblog. (1/n)
On February 27, 2021, the FDA issued an emergency use authorization for a third SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The vaccine was developed by Janssen Pharmaceutica, a Belgium-based division of Johnson & Johnson, in collaboration with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. (2/n)
Perhaps the most exciting feature of this new vaccine is that it only requires one dose to be effective in inducing an immune response. (3/n)
There is currently a resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil, despite the fact that about 76% of the population had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, which would normally lead to herd immunity. What is the cause of this resurgence? Short Thread. (1/n)
The truth is, nobody knows, but there are at least four mutually exclusive possibilities: (2/n)
1) The attack rate could have been overestimated during the first wave, meaning that the population remained below herd immunity. Attack rate is the percentage of an at-risk population that contracts the disease during a specified time interval. (3/n)
As more and more people are vaccinated, one of the major questions is whether or not the vaccines protect only from disease, or both from disease and infection. Short thread. (1/n)
Even if they completely prevent disease in a vaccinated person, there is a chance that that person can still become infected, replicate virus to a certain extent, possibly to a sufficient level to infect another (unvaccinated) person. 2/n)
The studies analyzing this feature of SARS-CoV-2 immunity are well under way. Here are results from one such study from Israel, which is ahead of the rest of the world in the vaccination process. (3/n)
Vaccines, convalescent plasma, and monoclonal antibodies.
What is the difference between these three things and what do they have in common? A thread. (1/n)
The major shared feature is that they all involve the action of antibodies, but the source of the antibodies and their durability is vastly different. (2/n)
Vaccines present or lead to the presentation of an antigen (e.g., a piece of a virus) that induces your immune system to make your own antibodies. Those antibodies stay in your body for a long time and are affiliated with an immune memory that lasts even longer. (3/n)
It is now a little more than a year since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, and we already have several highly effective vaccines against this virus. (2/n)
Because of my previous research experience in vaccine science, I was very skeptical about the promise of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine this soon. I was wrong, and I could not be happier about that. (3/n)
What are bioRxiv and medRxiv? They are servers where anybody can self-publish a scientific article. Legitimate journals put a submitted research paper through pretty rigorous peer review, but the publications on these "preprint" servers are not peer reviewed. Thread. (1/n)
As you might imagine there can be quite a bit of junk on there, including the paper that has been making headlines, allegedly showing that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse transcribed and integrated into the human genome. (2/n)
The conditions under which these experiments were done were extremely artificial, where probably just about any RNA would have been reverse transcribed and integrated. But the authors didn't show that. (3/n)