BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court issues ruling in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, major voting-rights case out of Arizona. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
BREAKING NEWS: In 6-3 ruling, SCOTUS upholds two Arizona voting provisions: a ban on so-called "ballot harvesting," and a policy that throws out an entire ballot if it was cast in the wrong precinct. Challengers argued that both provisions discriminate against minority voters.
Justice Alito writes the majority opinion joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.
Justice Kagan dissents joined by Breyer and Sotomayor.
Justice Alito for the court, "[W]e think it prudent to make clear at the beginning that we decline in these cases to announce a test to govern all VRA §2 claims involving rules, like those at issue here, that specify the time, place, or manner for casting ballots."
Kagan says that today's ruling "undermines Section 2 and the right it provides" because it "gives a cramped reading to broad language" and then "uses that reading to uphold" the out-of-precinct policy and the ban on ballot harvesting.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: The Supreme Court adds nine new cases to next term's docket, including. Here's the full order list: supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor….
And here’s a thread on each of the cases the court agreed to hear:
In Carson v. Makin, the court will revisit the interaction of state tuition-assistance programs and religious education. The case involves a Maine program that bars students from using public tuition aid to attend private religious schools. scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
In Cummings v. Premier, the court will hear the case of a deaf woman who is seeking damages for emotional distress from a health care provider that refused to provide her with an ASL interpreter. The issue is whether those damages are available under the relevant statutes.
In a dispute over a controversial proposed natural-gas pipeline through New Jersey, the Supreme Court rules in favor of the pipeline company. SCOTUS says Jersey does not have sovereign immunity from the company's attempts to seize state-owned property along the pipeline route.
In City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc., the court will consider whether Austin's sign ordinance violated the First Amendment by treating "off-premises" billboards differently from "on-premises" signs.
In Patel v. Garland, the court will hear an appeal from a man who entered the U.S. without authorization in 1992 and is now seeking to avoid deportation and obtain a green card under a provision of immigration law that provides for discretionary relief in certain circumstances.
BREAKING: The court rules in favor of a Catholic social services organization that sued Philadelphia after the city excluded it from a foster-care program due to the organization's refusal to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the court joined in full by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh and Barrett.
Justice Barrett wrote separately to concur joined by Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Breyer (in all but the first paragraph). Alito and Gorsuch both filed separate concurring opinions. Alito's joined by Gorsuch and Thomas. Gorsuch's joined by Alito and Thomas.
NEW: SCOTUS rules against federal government's interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Court says a felony involving recklessness does not satisfy the law's "use of physical force" element and thus does not trigger the law's "violent felony" mandatory minimum sentence.
Here is the opinion delivered by Justice Kagan in Borden v. United States. This is the only opinion for today. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
An unusual voting line-up in a complex case with no clear majority. Breyer, Sotomayor & Gorsuch join Kagan's opinion. Thomas concurs in the result but does not agree with the reasoning. Kavanaugh dissents (joined by Roberts, Alito & Barrett).
The Supreme Court adds one new case to its docket for next term: a case about whether the federal government can assert the state-secrets privilege to avoid disclosing evidence in a lawsuit brought by Muslims who say they were targeted for surveillance based on their religion.
SCOTUS also declines to take up a constitutional challenge in which @ACLU argued that the government is committing sex discrimination by requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.