NEW: The Supreme Court adds nine new cases to next term's docket, including. Here's the full order list: supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor….

And here’s a thread on each of the cases the court agreed to hear:
In Carson v. Makin, the court will revisit the interaction of state tuition-assistance programs and religious education. The case involves a Maine program that bars students from using public tuition aid to attend private religious schools. scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
In Cummings v. Premier, the court will hear the case of a deaf woman who is seeking damages for emotional distress from a health care provider that refused to provide her with an ASL interpreter. The issue is whether those damages are available under the relevant statutes.
Here is more on Cummings v. Premier: scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
In Hughes v. Northwestern, the court will weigh in on a case involving allegations that a retirement plan charged its members excessive fees. The case involves whether those allegations are enough to sue under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
In American Hospital Association v. Becerra, the court will hear a challenge to federal regulations that reduced Medicare reimbursement rates to hospitals for certain prescription drugs. The case involves whether Chevron deference applies to the regulations at issue.
In Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation, the court will review another dispute between the hospital industry and the federal government over Medicare pay. This case involves the calculation of certain payments for hospitals serving a disproportionate number of low-income patients.
In Gallardo v. Marstiller, the court will decide whether Florida's Medicaid program can recover the costs of prior medical care from a patient who received a civil settlement that is meant to pay for future treatment. scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
In CVS Pharmacy v. Doe, the court will hear a class-action lawsuit alleging that a CVS policy on out-of-network rates for specialty medications disproportionately harms people with HIV. The issue is whether the relevant statutes allow a "disparate impact" discrimination claim.
In Pivotol Software v. Tran, the court will weigh in on a discovery-stay dispute in securities litigation.
In U.S. v. Taylor, the court will decide whether the crime of attempted robbery under a federal law known as the Hobbs Act counts as a "crime of violence" for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement.
Correction from above: The court added TEN cases (not nine) to its docket. The 10th is Mississippi v. Tennessee, a long-running dispute over the apportionment of groundwater between – you guessed it – Mississippi and Tennessee.
Other big news from today's order list: The court DECLINES to take up the case of a florist who refused to provide flowers for a same-sex wedding. The florist argued that the state of Washington's non-discrimination law infringed on her religious rights.
That case is Arlene's Flowers v. Washington. Justices Thomas, Alito & Gorsuch indicate that they voted to hear the case. Because it takes four votes to hear a case, that means the other six justices chose not to take it up.
In Dunn v. Reeves, the court summarily reverses a lower court's ruling that granted relief to an Alabama death-row prisoner who argued that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Breyer, Sotomayor & Kagan dissent.
The court declines to take up Berisha v. Lawson, a defamation case. Thomas & Gorsuch write dissents suggesting the court should revisit a longstanding First Amendment principle (known as "actual malice") that makes it very difficult for public figures to win defamation suits.
The court also declines to take up Eychaner v. City of Chicago, an eminent-domain case that would have provided an opportunity for the court to reconsider its controversial 2005 ruling in Kelo v. City of New London. Thomas, Gorsuch & Kavanaugh say they would have taken the case.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SCOTUSblog

SCOTUSblog Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SCOTUSblog

1 Jul
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court issues ruling in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, major voting-rights case out of Arizona. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
BREAKING NEWS: In 6-3 ruling, SCOTUS upholds two Arizona voting provisions: a ban on so-called "ballot harvesting," and a policy that throws out an entire ballot if it was cast in the wrong precinct. Challengers argued that both provisions discriminate against minority voters.
Justice Alito writes the majority opinion joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

Justice Kagan dissents joined by Breyer and Sotomayor.
Read 5 tweets
29 Jun
In a dispute over a controversial proposed natural-gas pipeline through New Jersey, the Supreme Court rules in favor of the pipeline company. SCOTUS says Jersey does not have sovereign immunity from the company's attempts to seize state-owned property along the pipeline route.
Here's the opinion in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey: supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
That is the third and final opinion of the day.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jun
The Supreme Court adds two new cases to next term's docket. Here's the full order list: supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor….
In City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc., the court will consider whether Austin's sign ordinance violated the First Amendment by treating "off-premises" billboards differently from "on-premises" signs.

Here is more about the case: scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
In Patel v. Garland, the court will hear an appeal from a man who entered the U.S. without authorization in 1992 and is now seeking to avoid deportation and obtain a green card under a provision of immigration law that provides for discretionary relief in certain circumstances.
Read 9 tweets
17 Jun
BREAKING: The court rules in favor of a Catholic social services organization that sued Philadelphia after the city excluded it from a foster-care program due to the organization's refusal to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the court joined in full by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh and Barrett.
Justice Barrett wrote separately to concur joined by Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Breyer (in all but the first paragraph). Alito and Gorsuch both filed separate concurring opinions. Alito's joined by Gorsuch and Thomas. Gorsuch's joined by Alito and Thomas.
Read 5 tweets
10 Jun
NEW: SCOTUS rules against federal government's interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Court says a felony involving recklessness does not satisfy the law's "use of physical force" element and thus does not trigger the law's "violent felony" mandatory minimum sentence.
Here is the opinion delivered by Justice Kagan in Borden v. United States. This is the only opinion for today. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
An unusual voting line-up in a complex case with no clear majority. Breyer, Sotomayor & Gorsuch join Kagan's opinion. Thomas concurs in the result but does not agree with the reasoning. Kavanaugh dissents (joined by Roberts, Alito & Barrett).
Read 4 tweets
7 Jun
The Supreme Court adds one new case to its docket for next term: a case about whether the federal government can assert the state-secrets privilege to avoid disclosing evidence in a lawsuit brought by Muslims who say they were targeted for surveillance based on their religion.
Here is the full order list: supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
SCOTUS also declines to take up a constitutional challenge in which @ACLU argued that the government is committing sex discrimination by requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(