The Federal Trade Commission is now holding forth on a rule to stop fraudulent Made in USA labeling.
Chopra says there has been a longstanding bipartisan consensus not to enforce against fraudulent Made in USA labeling, choosing a "highly permissive Made in USA fraud policy." Commissioners routinely voted to allow wrongdoers to escape penalties.
Now Chopra is saying that they got a lot of comments from ranchers. The FTC won't exempt the beef industry, which the meatpackers sought. @JDScholten
Now Republican Noah Phillips is saying that he opposes the Made in USA fraud rule because it exceeds FTC authority.
And Republican FTC Commissioner Christine Wilson is complaining about having an open meeting and forcing them to vote on policies with only a week's notice. Calls the process "chaos" instead of a "thoughtful process."
It's just amazing that the Democratic Commissioners at the FTC are fighting for a Made in USA policy Trump sought while the Republicans are angrily opposing it and opposing even having an open meeting.
It turns out that @FTCPhillips's 'process' complaint is that the version of the rule he had to vote on had a typo.
Motion passes 3-2 to adopt a rule against Made in USA fraud.
Republican FTC Commissioner Christine Wilson is now going back to the 1970s when she claimed the FTC overreached.
Always the 1970s. I wonder if she's afraid the squeegee men will come back.
This is really the core dynamic at issue. The GOP commissioners are basically saying 'they are trying to govern!' as a critique.
And now Lina Khan is proposing withdrawing the Obama-era bipartisan rule that constrained the FTC from policing fair competition. This is a big deal.
From 'what planet am I on' politics... Republican @CSWilsonFTC lauds Obama's bipartisan policy constraining the enforcement fair competition while the Democrats are advocating for reversing Obama's policy and promoting Made in USA.
Repealing the Section 5 unfair methods of competition statement is something we recommended in Courage to Learn. economicliberties.us/our-work/coura…
The debate is now all about the consumer welfare standard. Wilson proposes a comment period. Chopra points out there was no comment period when the statement was adopted.
Hard to describe but this atmosphere is tense.
Now Khan is proposing making it easier for the FTC staff to investigate a bunch of different things, like mergers. She has already been upsetting the antitrust defense bar. mattstoller.substack.com/p/the-new-ftc-…
“FTC orders are not suggestions.” - Commissioner Chopra
Talks about the Facebook settlement. Says the FTC is often willing to bring down the hammer on small firms but lets the big ones off the hook.
Time for public statements. First is a restaurant owner asking for an investigation into DoorDash, Uber, for menu stealing and deception. Then an independent pharmacist against PBM monopolists.
Now another restaurant owner complained about DoorDash caused chaos at his restaurant. Public comments are great.
Tech lobbyist Neil Chilson talking now complaining about FTC overregulation. Such a stark contrast between Chilson and people in business.
And @chesterj1 laying out the utter failures of the FTC on regulating surveillance advertising.
Now franchisee Keith Miller is saying the FTC is pathetic in looking out for franchisees. Doesn’t bother to even collect documents from franchisors.
And Chris Jones from the National Grocers talks about why independent grocers didn’t get supplies during the pandemic. Asks the FTC to revive the Robinson-Patman Act.
If these public comments are any indication we can draw two conclusions. One, business owners are mad and want the FTC to act. And two, many of them are accidentally on mute.
As business owners talk about how they are preyed on by monopolists, I can see Republican commissioner Noah Phillips actively not caring. The light in his eyes went out.
This hearing has everything.
Surveillance equipment made in China marketed as "Made in the USA." Health care kickbacks raising pharmaceutical prices. Pandemic-related shortages due to price discrimination.
The Heritage Foundation sent someone to complain about the open meeting and the lack of time to weigh in on the agenda.
Dude there are people with real problems.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Judge James Boasberg - an Obama appointee - dismisses the case on market definition quibbling. Boasberg says there are no clear lines on what even constitutes social networking.
Basically the judge concedes Mark Zuckerberg said 'let's do crimes' but because judges now read antitrust law to require super weird expensive fights over market definitions, the case was dismissed. It can be refiled.
These quotes from Larry Summers are practically word for word Chicago School talking points. Summers is not a scholar, he doesn’t have ideas, he’s merely a lobbyist for capital. bloomberg.com/news/videos/20…
The key political question is whether the point of antitrust is to take on market power or foster it under the guise of efficiency. Summers merely repeats all the old shibboleths, ‘protect competition not competitors,’ ‘1960’s horror show,’ etc.
If you think we have a monopoly problem in America then you have common sense. If you think things are fine then you are Larry Summers. bloomberg.com/news/videos/20…
This is just wrong and a naive read of the Chinese government. The PRC will not respond to anything but force and sustained embarrassment.
Until scientists stop acting like weenies and say 'the virus probably came from the Wuhan Lab and China is covering it up' we get nothing.
The utterly reckless and naive approach to the Chinese government continues to astonish. Their leaders are self-described Leninists who do not believe in scientific truth. To them truth is about raw power, and nothing more.
And by 'force' I don't mean war, I mean using economic and political leverage to protect ourselves from PRC coercion.
Judiciary markup of big tech antitrust bills reconvenes, members are officially tired already.
Jim Jordan says the conflict of interest break-up bill HR 3825 has too much vagueness and will allow an "army of woke civil servants" to carve up big tech.
And now @RepJayapal is giving a good history of how break-ups help foster innovation.
While the NCAA ruling was narrow and full of consumer welfare nonsense - the court is bad after all - there are some useful parts to take away. First, the court ruled that suppressing labor competition is an antitrust harm.
Second, the court narrowed the cross-balancing test involved in AMEX by saying that any cost to one set of stakeholders had to have a direct connection to benefits to others. The NCAA can't claim that not paying student athletes is good for fans unless they directly prove it.
Re: NYC mayor's race. I took a quick look at the top four candidate's web sites to see how they see small business from an anti-monopoly lens. They all have 'get rid of regulations' and 'provide capital to struggling small businesses'' pro forma box checking.
Kathryn Garcia wants to retain the restaurant fee delivery cap on Uber, et al. She also has an interesting proposal on helping to live-stream theater. And she discusses the need to break from cable monopolies for universal broadband. kgfornyc.com/policy/recover…
Eric Adams wants to retain the restaurant fee delivery cap on Uber, et al. He also wants to tax online services, like streaming, and use the money to cut taxes on local businesses who are disadvantages by tech giants. ericadams2021.com/erics-economic…