When you say 'Diversity efforts are fine, but we can't sacrifice merit,' you're implying that folks of color are likely less qualified, rather than acknowledging a) your standards of merit are subjective, and b) such efforts identify merit in places it's normally overlooked (1)..
To even imply such efforts would sacrifice merit is to presume the current occupational distribution reflects merit. But that requires believing whites (white men particularly) are inherently superior to others. And only racists (and sexists) could believe that (2)...
Either white folks are inherently superior or the opportunity structure is skewed in our favor: there is no other way to make sense of the current distribution of occupational positions. Obviously, only ignorant racists can believe the first of these to be true...(3)
I wish right-wingers would just admit this is what they believe -- that white people are superior, and men are as well -- rather than dance around it. At least David Duke and Richard Spencer are honest.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Whites often say Black people are dependent (on govt, etc). But if you have a direct ancestor who was an enslaver, you owe your LIFE to Black restraint. Had they killed your relative to get free (which they were morally entitled to do) you wouldn't exist. Who's the dependent one?
And yes, it would have been moral for any enslaved person to kill their captor. Would have been true for Ariel Castro's victims a decade or so ago, and true for those kidnapped and held in chattel bondage for 250+ years...
And this isn't even getting into how dependent white folks (and America on the whole) have been on Black labor, etc to even build the nation, obviously. I was just wanting to make the existential point because we often miss it
However one feels about NC State being disqualified from the College World Series bc of positive COVID tests (and I agree, it's questionable given crowds being able to attend w/o tests/masks), some of the anti-Vanderbilt sentiment is incredibly twisted and revealing...
THREAD
First, it's not the players' fault, so hating on them is just petty bullshit. Second, showing a pic of Fauci in a Vandy shirt is not evidence that the fix is in. Some of y'all need to put down the Alex Jones pipe. You are why we can't have nice things (2)...
After all, college baseball would benefit MORE from having a great amazing underdog team like NC State knock off the defending champs, than simply passing Vandy on to the finals. The "fix" theory is illogical on its own terms (3)...
The difference between liberals, conservatives & critical race theorists in one tweet
Liberals: 'America is failing to live up to its promises when it comes to equality'
Conservatives: 'No it's not.'
Critical Race Theorists: 'What promises? Those were never meant for everyone'
Fundamentally this is the key distinction. The right thinks racial disparities are the fault of those on the bottom. Liberals think we just haven't quite perfected our system. CRTs say this is exactly what the system was meant to produce...
One can agree or disagree with any of these, in turn, or perhaps come up with some hybrid of them if you choose. But to say one school of thought (CRT) is forbidden and too dangerous to allow people to hear is authoritarian thought control
My latest essay on how the attack on Critical Race Theory (and antiracist education more broadly) would require canceling the real MLK from being taught. Strategically, this is a key point to emphasize in our response to them. Pass it along...
The reason this is an important response to the right's attack on CRT and antiracist education is two fold: first, they are seeking to wrap themselves in MLKs words, by distorting the only line they know of his. We must prevent them from effectively doing that...
And second, by responding with material like that I quote in this piece -- most of it stuff few people have ever read or heard from King -- we can further present the real MLK, which is helpful in and of itself...
I love it when folks say the South is so patriotic. They typically mean white conservatives of course. But historically white conservatives have been the LEAST patriotic group. Don't believe me?
A quick thread.
First, they wouldn't even join the nation unless slavery was protected & strengthened via the 3/5 compromise, a fugitive slave return provision in the constitution and the extension of the trans-Atlantic slave trade for 20 more years (2)...
...not to mention the 2nd Amendment, which, as @ProfCAnderson demonstrates in her brilliant new book, The Second, was principally about strengthening the white militia so as to put down possible rebellions by enslaved Black folks (3)...
Your daily reminder that those who would ban antiracist education or Critical Race Theory would have to ban MLK. And the only reason people don't realize this is they've never read King or listened to any of his speeches except one misinterpreted line from one speech
THREAD...
After all, King recognized the systemic nature of injustice and how to address it when he said:
"...the problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power.” (2)
He also was clear about white ignorance:
'Whites are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn.' (3)