About unsolicited explanations (frequently from men to women #Mansplaining)
Quick tutorial if you are not familiar (extracted from the article below)
bbc.com/worklife/artic…
Has someone asked you to explain it? If not, asume they know at least the basics. We work in science, we’re curious, we ask if we don’t know or if we want to know more about a specific topic
Ask yourself whether your urge to explain something comes from you making bad assumptions about someone else’s knowledge / or (frequently in our field) you think you know more about a subject than anyone else. Quick answer to this last one - you’re likely to be wrong
Are you miss-reading the situation due to bias - think twice and you might find you’re - we are ALL biased, if you think you aren’t, then again, you’re likely to be wrong
And hey! Sometimes it just come from you trying to be useful and help, but we all should understand when we have been asked to provide further information, or when that is not necessary- and keep and eye to see if you are systematically targeting the same population

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Laura Fachal

Laura Fachal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FachalLaura

7 Jan 20
So glad to finally 😅 share our #breastcancer fine mapping paper published today in @NatureGenet
nature.com/articles/s4158…
Here come the main highlights 👇🏼
We evaluated in detail 150 known #breastcancer risk regions using genotyped 🧬 data from the #BCAC and #CIMBA
Many researchers 👩🏽‍💻🧑🏼‍🔬👩🏻‍🔬👨🏽‍🔬👨🏾‍💻participated in this study that involved more than 200k subjects!
We defined up to 205 independent risk signals with high confidence, and their most plausible candidate variants. Most variants are located at tissue specific #breastcancer regulatory regions and transcription factor binding sites
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(