imagine spending hours clipping a podcast to include only relevant bits of a claim instead of a bunch of on-air fumbles
and then people that should be paying attention just think you're unfairly editing to make their science daddy look like an idiot
and then people that should be paying attention just think you're unfairly editing to make their science daddy look like an idiot
https://twitter.com/colinTpetersen/status/1411403407890419715
my clips of Bret Weinstein's podcasts are cut up because Heather Heying is always saying 'ummmm', Bret is distracting all guests because he's glancing around the room like a space cadet and they are always fucking around with their MacBook for half the episode
every Bret Weinstein "Dark Horse Podcast" episode is like 3 hours long, and it's an 1 hour of just dead air and then 1 hour of dumb banter and then 1 hour of being insanely wrong and irresponsible
if you think i've made an unfair cut, then just go back to the episode, rewind back 5 minutes, and watch it. and then ask Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying stand by their reading of the retracted Walach study
please note: I'm not here finding studies that prove Bret Weinstein wrong. I'm reading the studies that Bret Weinstein finds, finding out that they are full of shit, and then showing you exactly where Bret Weinstein fumbles
it's really hard to say Bret Weinstein should read better studies. I'm saying that Bret Weinstein should read his bullshit studies *better*. Bret Weinstein should have know the Walach study... was written by Walach. that was a huge red flag.
not only does Bret Weinstein make bad studies worse by reading them very poorly, he's wagering his entire reputation on something that does not make any logical sense
https://twitter.com/uberfeminist/status/1411246252256337923
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
