For NAIDOC, Channel 10 did the weather using Indigenous place names. Let’s have a look at some of the reactions. (CW - racism). 1/n
Some bloke I’ve never heard of and won’t link to decided to write a blog post about the use of Indigenous place names on the weather map. Here’s the post in full. Snide, condescending, ignorant and hateful. 2/n
The rest of the reactions here are from a Twitter thread sharing the original blog post. The point of sharing them is to demonstrate the pushback that exists to the use of Indigenous languages in public in Australia. 3/n
Next year is the start of the International Decade of Indigenous Languages. If First Nations languages here are going to flourish and thrive, we need to address the widespread hostility towards them, as part of a broader program of reclamation and maintenance. 4/n
What does that hostility look like? Like this. Indigenous languages and made up. Garbage. 5/n
Using Indigenous languages will confuse… racists. 6/n
Presenting these two together. Please don’t tell them where the ‘English’ alphabet comes from. 7/n
Variation on a theme that portrays Indigenous language revitalization as fake and insincere. 8/n
Presenting this tweet and the profile together without comment. 9/10
Just belittling Indigenous languages and the people who hold them dear. 10/n
Anyway, I won’t post any more. You get the idea. Whenever Indigenous languages are used in public in Australia there is always horrific backlash like this. 11/n
This backlash follows predictable patterns and regurgitates the same ideas. You can read about them here in this piece that @JakelinTroy and I wrote.
So @shaunrein is a full-blown denialist. Let’s use the five features of denialism from Diethelm & McKee to examine what he’s doing and why it is denialism.
Sean thinks the western media is a conspiracy to deceive ppl about Tibet. (I think the media is biased and often reports half truths-but it’s not a conspiracy).
2) the use of fake experts.
Sean is himself the fake expert. He knows nothing about language politics and policy, but he thinks his status as eye witness enables him to debunk the ‘myths’ about Tibet. It doesn’t.
What would a good theory of linguistic justice do? At a minimum, it would help explain global patterns of language oppression - how is injustice driving the elimination of half the worlds languages? 1/n
Sorry, adequate, not good. At present we don’t have a theory of linguistic justice that helps explain global patterns of language oppression, so we don’t have an adequate theory of linguistic justice. 2/n
How would we know this theory works? At least two ways.
1. It would provide new solutions for addressing language oppression, and...
3/n
Waiting for a bus so here is a true public transport story. As a uni student I lived in the burbs. Went out with friends one night and came home on the train. We stopped half way to walk a friend home...
When we got back to the train station, we had missed the last train. It was about 20 minutes each way to my friends house and we’d miscalculated the time. My house was a long way off.
We couldn’t figure out what to do. It was too far to walk and there were not taxis around. So we set out for a main road