$DIDI seeks to make life better by transforming mobility. $DIDI is the largest ride-sharing company in China. $DIDI has IPO on 30 June 2021 becoming the largest Chinese IPO in the US since $BABA in 2014. Here is a thread on the things you need to know about $DIDI. 👇👇
1. $DIDI Overview
$DIDI offers a range of services, such as ride hailing, taxi hailing, chauffeur, hitch as well as electric mobility, auto solutions, food delivery, intra-city freight and financial services across 15 countries. $DIDI in many ways is the Chinese version of $UBER
2. Total Addressable Market
The global ride sharing market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 16.6% from $85.8 billion in 2021 to $185 billion by 2026.
3. Penetration Rate
The penetration rate of ride sharing services out of total mobility expenditure is estimated to be at 4% and will grow to 8.1% by 2025.
4. Value Proposition
$DIDI's value proposition is to make ride sharing services cheaper than owning a private car. $DIDI in its S1 filing has stated that taking $DIDI everywhere in China is cheaper than owning a private car. However, not for US because of higher labor costs.
5. $DIDI's strategy
$DIDI aims to create a classic platform flywheel effect. When there are more supply and demand, the better the service will be and the lower the cost.
6. $DIDI’s Scale
According to $DIDI’s S1 filing, $DIDI operates in 15 countries and nearly 4000 cities, counties, and towns. $DIDI has 493 million of annual active users, 15 million of annual active drivers, 41 millions of average daily transactions.
7. Monopoly in China
According to Statista, $DIDI have a ride sharing monopoly in China with over 90% of market share. However, $DIDI do not enjoy monopoly outside of China and is constantly facing fierce competition with price pressure.
8. Autonomous Driving
$DIDI has sensed that autonomous driving is the future. $DIDI are developing their L4 autonomous driving and operating system. $DIDI currently operates a fleet of over 100 ‘robotaxi’ in real life.
9. Autonomous driving is critical for $DIDI, as it can eliminate $DIDI biggest cost, ‘driver cost’. However, as $DIDI uses a Lidar solution, $DIDI's autonomous fleet can only be scaled slowly, as all area of operations must be ‘pre-mapped’ first.
10. $DIDI D1
$DIDI had partnered with $BYD to produce the D1, an electric vehicle built specifically for ride shares. $DIDI has put 10,000 D1 in service in 2020 and aimed to put another 100,000 D1 to service in 2021.
11. Electric Charging Network
$DIDI runs Xiao Ju Che Fu which have 20,000 electric chargers (and 70,000+ when Xiao Ju partners’ chargers are included) over 31 cities in China. Xiao Ju is currently the largest ‘public’ charging network in China, with a market share of around 30%.
12. Auto Solutions
$DIDI finance provides services, such as insurance, loans, and payment solutions specifically for ridesharing. $DIDI’s Xiao Ju also provides solutions for car financing and leasing. $DIDI had the largest vehicle leasing network in China according to $DIDI’s S1
13. Shared bicycle
$DIDI runs $DIDI bike, which provides shared bicycle. $DIDI bike is the biggest bike sharing player in China with 34.92 million monthly active users (MAU). $DIDI bike is closely followed by Hellobike’s 31.53 million MAU and Meituan bike’s 2262.4 million.
14. Revenue Breakdown
$DIDI’s revenue has grown by 14.41% from 2018 to 2019 and declined by 8.43% in 2020. For 2021 Q1, $DIDI has recorded a revenue of 42.163 billion RMB (6.514 billion USD), a 106% YoY growth over 2020 Q1.
14.1 Both $DIDI's past yearly and quarterly revenue growth cannot be interpreted off its face value, because yearly annual growth was severely impacted by Covid, whereas 2020 Q1 was a relatively small base due to China being in lockdown, making YoY quarterly growth inaccurate.
14.2 The market consensus is that $DIDI is likely to grow around 25-30% in the coming years, but no growth rates are guaranteed. We may need to wait until the end of Covid to obtain a better picture of $DIDI's true revenue growth.
14.3 Although $DIDI has been expanding outside of China aggressive, $DIDI still receives 93.06% of their revenue from China in 2021 Q1, a slight improvement from 2018’s 98.46%.
14.4 $DIDI has been growing their international and other initiatives businesses, However, these still only made up less than 7% of $DIDI’s total revenue in Q1 2021.
15. Cost Breakdown
For 2021 Q1, $DIDI's costs have totaled to 116% of $DIDI's revenue, with cost of revenue, which includes driver fees and driver/passenger incentives being the largest expense.
15.1 $DIDI’s different costs as a percentage of revenue have not had a clear decreasing trend from 2018 to 2021 Q1.
16. Loss from Operations and Net Loss
$DIDI is a money losing business as indicated below. Surprisingly, $DIDI had made a net income for 2021 Q1. However, it is a one-off event due to $DIDI's investment income of 12.36 billion RMB rather than income from $DIDI's operations.
16.1 Profitability remains a concern going forward for $DIDI and it may take many years until $DIDI reach profitability (that is if $DIDI ever becomes profitable).
17. Catastrophic Events – Two Murder Cases
In 2018, there were two cases where a girl was raped and killed when she took $DIDI’s hitch services. These murders created an intense public outburst and government attention in China, blaming $DIDI's inability to protect their customer
17.1 $DIDI stopped its hitch service after the second murder and implemented additional protective measures. Although no murders had happened with $DIDI after 2018, if such unfortunate case happened again, $DIDI will likely face even heavier criticism and public boycott. 5 of the top 10 trending topics on Weibo was related to the
18. Risk – Growth
Although the Street expects $DIDI to grow at around 25-30%, $DIDI already has a monopoly in China, and its ability to grow and maintain international market share remains to be proven.
19. Risk – International expansion and other initiatives
$DIDI need to continue expanding internationally and not having 90% of its revenue solely coming from China, if $DIDI aims to be a global company. $DIDI’s other initiatives may provide a diversified income stream for $DIDI
19.1 If these two components do not expand, $DIDI’s potential will be vastly capped at only being a China ride-sharing company, leaving no room for ‘valuation imagination’.
20. Risk – Driver Cost
Driver cost is by far the largest cost for $DIDI. If driver cost increases or legislations determines that $DIDI must classified their drivers as ‘employees’ rather than ‘independent contractors’, $DIDI would be even further away from profitability.
21. Regulatory Risk
Just days after $DIDI’s IPO, China’s internet regulator has announced that they are reviewing the cybersecurity of $DIDI and no new user registration will be allowed during the review.
21.1 Given that $DIDI is a monopoly and the previous case of $BABA and Jack Ma, regulatory scrutiny and antitrust action on $DIDI by the Chinese government is possible.
BREAKING: At the time of me publishing this thread, there are news that the $DIDI app has been removed in China citing cybersecurity concerns and allegation that $DIDI has sold data to western countries. When $DIDI can be downloaded again is unknown.
This signals the severity and the real possibility of a crackdown on $DIDI considering its monopoly in China. Therefore, regulatory risks must be considered when considering an investment in $DIDI.
22. Risks – Price War
Although $DIDI said it provides a different ‘service’ compare to its competitors, in my respective opinion, ride sharing is a ‘commodity’, which companies compete almost solely on price. Below is a brief history of $DIDI’s price war.
23. A $DIDI Price War History
In 2014, $DIDI only had 50% market share, whereas $DIDI’s biggest competitor, Kuaidadi, 40%. The two competed by going on a fierce price war. The price war was so fierce that the two spent 2 billion RMB in 2014 just to subsidize their customers
23.1 $DIDI has even burnt 40 million RMB a day in subsidies. Chinese have even half-jokingly said that ride sharing was free. After a year of price war, the two realized that it was unsustainable, and the two ultimately came into good terms with a blockbuster merger.
23.2 Soon after the merger, $UBER arrives at China, and $UBER's CEO Travis Kalanick said to $DIDI's founder, Cheng Wei, ‘there’s only two routes for $DIDI, either $DIDI accepts a large investment from $UBER or $UBER will crush $DIDI’. Cheng Wei rejected $UBER's offer.
23.3 Unsurprisingly, $DIDI and $UBER went on price war. Cheng Wei sensed that $DIDI could not beat $UBER alone, decided to invest in Lyft, $UBER’s biggest competitor in the US, and Grab, $UBER’s competitor in Southeast Asia. All these companies then all have price war with $UBER.
23.4 $UBER realized that having price war everywhere was not going to cut it, decided to sell $UBER China to $DIDI for about 7 billion and a stake in $DIDI. $DIDI also invested about 1 billion in $UBER. This thereby concluded the price war of ride sharing in China.
23.5 As the price war ends in China, $DIDI started its international expansion. Well, how did $DIDI expand? You guessed it, $DIDI started price war almost everywhere that $DIDI expand to. Until today, $DIDI is still having price war all over the world.
23.6 With so many price wars and fierce competition, it is hard to see when these price war will end. I am therefore doubtful to when $DIDI will be profitable.
24. Valuation
$DIDI currently has a market cap of 74.9B, a P/S ratio of 3 and EV/Sales of 5.42. $UBER has a market cap of 97.11B, P/S of 9 and EV/Sales 9.78. Although on its face, $DIDI is cheaper, this is not the reality, because $DIDI and $UBER recognizes revenue differently.
24.1 $UBER recognizes its revenue net of driver and merchant earnings and driver incentive, whereas $DIDI recognizes its revenue before driver earnings and incentives. This difference created the ‘delusion’ that $DIDI is cheaper than $UBER.
24.2 To better compare the two, I decided to compare the two companies’ net revenue (revenue – cost of sales). Bloomberg has estimated that $DIDI will have a 30B revenue in 2021, whereas $UBER 16B. $DIDI has a cost of revenue of 89% of revenue, whereas $UBER around 46%.
24.3 With these numbers, I calculated the Price/2021 net revenue for $UBER to be 11.24, whereas for $DIDI 22.70. $DIDI also has an EV/2021 net revenue of 40.97 larger than $UBER’s 12.21, On these two rough but more comparable terms, $UBER is cheaper than $DIDI.
25. Conclusion
$DIDI is the top 2 ride sharing company in the world. However, I am skeptical about $DIDI’s business model, as $DIDI will need to improve their margins while being handicapped by $DIDI’s biggest cost ‘drive cost’ as this would probably not decrease much.
25.1 Although $DIDI has a monopoly in China, such monopoly can only be maintained by low price. $DIDI must also continue its price war and discount price in other countries as they expand internationally. Regulatory crackdown/risks also just gotten VERY REAL.
25.2 In my humble opinion, $DIDI’s history of price wars, the ongoing price wars, combine with $DIDI’s inability to differentiate beside on merely ‘being cheap’, makes me skeptical of $DIDI’s long term success.
26. This is by no means the most comprehensive thread and I may have missed something about $DIDI, therefore be sure to write your insights or thoughts on $DIDI if you have any, especially if you have any contrary thoughts or a bull case for $DIDI!
27. Thank you very much for reading this thread! I hope you have learnt one or two things about $DIDI. If you liked the thread, be sure to consider liking it and retweeting it! It really does help me out a lot and I really appreciate it!
This thread may interest you and I would really appreciate your input/comments on $DIDI! 🙏🙏

@mukund
@daniel_toloko
@TanArrowz
@snorlax_support
@ripster47
@MrFourToEight
@NIONenad
@LaMonicaBuzz
@BrokeBackRican
@Innovestor_
@MT_Capital1
@HonestInvesting
If you are interested in $DIDI, here is another thread that i did which goes over some very sneaky (even borderline illegal) tactics $DIDI has played when they where trying to acquire their drivers.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with joshua tai

joshua tai Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoshuaTai0427

4 Jul
When $DIDI first started, $DIDI did not have enough drivers, because taxi drivers in china do not know about $DIDI . To acquire more drivers, $DIDI employed some sneaky tactics. Here is a EASY thread on some of the sneaky tactics $DIDI has used.

Let's get started 👇👇
1. $DIDI's biggest competitor, Yao Yao Ride Sharing, was the biggest ride sharing platform in Beijing before 2013. Yao Yao like $DIDI had limited drivers. Yao Yao advertised on TVs to invite taxi drivers to Yao Yao’s event, where Yao Yao would install the Yao Yao app for drivers.
$DIDI after noticing Yao Yao’s advertisement, immediately added a very short $DIDI's advertisement that plays right after Yao Yao’s advertisement. The advertisement goes like this: ‘please call or message xxx-xxx, where you can immediately download the $DIDI app’.
Read 23 tweets
2 Jul
The BEST Acquisition of ALL TIME 🔥

Acquisition is one of the most fascinating thing. Acquire properly, a company can yield 100x returns. Improperly, a company can be doomed. Today, we look at some of the BEST acquisitions of ALL time.

Here is an EASY thread👇👇
Honorable mention - $DIS acquires Pixar & Marvel

$DIS acquired Pixar for $7.4 billion in 2006 and Marvel for $4 billion in 2009. Pixar has then created famous animations such as Wall E, Toy Story 3, Up, Inside Out, Brave, Coco, generating a gross box office of $10 billion. Image
Marvel Cinematic Universe has become the single greatest movie universe the world has ever seen. The Marvel Cinematic Universe has created a total worldwide box office revenue of $22.56 billion. All these do not include the profits from related merchandise and video games Image
Read 28 tweets
1 Jul
$DADA and $JD

$DADA's goal is to empower stores to have the ability to deliver everything to their customers within an hour on-demand. $JD owns 51% of $DADA. Here is a thread on the things you need to know as a $DADA or $JD investor.

Let's get started 👇👇
1. The Chinese E-commerce Market – Growth
The China E-commerce market has grown rapidly over the past decade and is poised to continue to grow for the coming decades.
2. China E-commerce as a % of total sales
Despite strong growth, Chinese E-commerce share has only taken up 24.9% of the total retail sales in consumer goods in 2020. There is still great potential in the coming 5-10 years in Chinese E-commerce.
Read 61 tweets
28 Jun
$JD Health and $BABA AliHealth

$JD Health and $BABA Ali Health are $JD and $BABA's newest competition ground and the two biggest online medical platforms in China . Here is a thread on the things you need to know for $JD health and $Ali health.

Let’s get started! 👇👇
1. Problem
China have MANY medical problems. These include: poor structure of the Chinese medical system, inadequate/unequal resources, long waiting time, expensive medical services, sub-par medical quality and insufficient or unskilled medical staff.
2. Long waiting time
It is very inconvenient to visit a doctor in China unless you go to expensive private ones. There is not a clear distinction between a GP and a specialist, causing many elderlies, to crowd the hospital even when they only have a small medical issue. A very crowded hospital in China
Read 67 tweets
25 Jun
$JD logistics

$JD logistics is arguably $JD's BIGGEST MOAT. This thread will cover everything about $JD logistics that you need to know as a $JD or $JD logistics investor.

Let’s get started 👇👇
2. Problem
In 2007, Richard Liu, the founder of $JD, realized that to provide the best customer experience, $JD must have their own logistics network, because unlike the US, China did not have mature logistics companies that provide consistent speedy deliveries.
3. Solution
$JD logistics were established in 2007 to provide better experience for $JD customers. The establishment of $JD logistics was highly controversial back then; as the business model was unproven. Fast forward to 2021, $JD logistics has already become $JD’s biggest moat
Read 43 tweets
23 Jun
$BABA, $JD and $PDD are the three biggest online E-commerce platform in China.

This thread will compare the three and address the difference between the quality, price, delivery speed, customer experience and shopping experience.

Let's get started 👇👇 $PDD on the left, $BABA in the middle, and $JD on the right
1. $BABA
$BABA is the biggest Chinese online E-commerce platform with a market share around 50%, which is even larger than the combined market share of $JD and $PDD. The primary focus of $BABA is being a C2C platform. You can think of $BABA as a bigger and more successful $EBAY.
1.1 On top of C2C business, $BABA has also started their own Tmall B2C business to combat $JD. However, most shops on $BABA are still third-party shops now.
Read 45 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(