$DIDI seeks to make life better by transforming mobility. $DIDI is the largest ride-sharing company in China. $DIDI has IPO on 30 June 2021 becoming the largest Chinese IPO in the US since $BABA in 2014. Here is a thread on the things you need to know about $DIDI. 👇👇
1. $DIDI Overview
$DIDI offers a range of services, such as ride hailing, taxi hailing, chauffeur, hitch as well as electric mobility, auto solutions, food delivery, intra-city freight and financial services across 15 countries. $DIDI in many ways is the Chinese version of $UBER
2. Total Addressable Market
The global ride sharing market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 16.6% from $85.8 billion in 2021 to $185 billion by 2026.
3. Penetration Rate
The penetration rate of ride sharing services out of total mobility expenditure is estimated to be at 4% and will grow to 8.1% by 2025.
4. Value Proposition
$DIDI's value proposition is to make ride sharing services cheaper than owning a private car. $DIDI in its S1 filing has stated that taking $DIDI everywhere in China is cheaper than owning a private car. However, not for US because of higher labor costs.
5. $DIDI's strategy
$DIDI aims to create a classic platform flywheel effect. When there are more supply and demand, the better the service will be and the lower the cost.
6. $DIDI’s Scale
According to $DIDI’s S1 filing, $DIDI operates in 15 countries and nearly 4000 cities, counties, and towns. $DIDI has 493 million of annual active users, 15 million of annual active drivers, 41 millions of average daily transactions.
7. Monopoly in China
According to Statista, $DIDI have a ride sharing monopoly in China with over 90% of market share. However, $DIDI do not enjoy monopoly outside of China and is constantly facing fierce competition with price pressure.
8. Autonomous Driving
$DIDI has sensed that autonomous driving is the future. $DIDI are developing their L4 autonomous driving and operating system. $DIDI currently operates a fleet of over 100 ‘robotaxi’ in real life.
9. Autonomous driving is critical for $DIDI, as it can eliminate $DIDI biggest cost, ‘driver cost’. However, as $DIDI uses a Lidar solution, $DIDI's autonomous fleet can only be scaled slowly, as all area of operations must be ‘pre-mapped’ first.
10. $DIDI D1
$DIDI had partnered with $BYD to produce the D1, an electric vehicle built specifically for ride shares. $DIDI has put 10,000 D1 in service in 2020 and aimed to put another 100,000 D1 to service in 2021.
11. Electric Charging Network
$DIDI runs Xiao Ju Che Fu which have 20,000 electric chargers (and 70,000+ when Xiao Ju partners’ chargers are included) over 31 cities in China. Xiao Ju is currently the largest ‘public’ charging network in China, with a market share of around 30%.
12. Auto Solutions
$DIDI finance provides services, such as insurance, loans, and payment solutions specifically for ridesharing. $DIDI’s Xiao Ju also provides solutions for car financing and leasing. $DIDI had the largest vehicle leasing network in China according to $DIDI’s S1
13. Shared bicycle
$DIDI runs $DIDI bike, which provides shared bicycle. $DIDI bike is the biggest bike sharing player in China with 34.92 million monthly active users (MAU). $DIDI bike is closely followed by Hellobike’s 31.53 million MAU and Meituan bike’s 2262.4 million.
14. Revenue Breakdown
$DIDI’s revenue has grown by 14.41% from 2018 to 2019 and declined by 8.43% in 2020. For 2021 Q1, $DIDI has recorded a revenue of 42.163 billion RMB (6.514 billion USD), a 106% YoY growth over 2020 Q1.
14.1 Both $DIDI's past yearly and quarterly revenue growth cannot be interpreted off its face value, because yearly annual growth was severely impacted by Covid, whereas 2020 Q1 was a relatively small base due to China being in lockdown, making YoY quarterly growth inaccurate.
14.2 The market consensus is that $DIDI is likely to grow around 25-30% in the coming years, but no growth rates are guaranteed. We may need to wait until the end of Covid to obtain a better picture of $DIDI's true revenue growth.
14.3 Although $DIDI has been expanding outside of China aggressive, $DIDI still receives 93.06% of their revenue from China in 2021 Q1, a slight improvement from 2018’s 98.46%.
14.4 $DIDI has been growing their international and other initiatives businesses, However, these still only made up less than 7% of $DIDI’s total revenue in Q1 2021.
15. Cost Breakdown
For 2021 Q1, $DIDI's costs have totaled to 116% of $DIDI's revenue, with cost of revenue, which includes driver fees and driver/passenger incentives being the largest expense.
15.1 $DIDI’s different costs as a percentage of revenue have not had a clear decreasing trend from 2018 to 2021 Q1.
16. Loss from Operations and Net Loss
$DIDI is a money losing business as indicated below. Surprisingly, $DIDI had made a net income for 2021 Q1. However, it is a one-off event due to $DIDI's investment income of 12.36 billion RMB rather than income from $DIDI's operations.
16.1 Profitability remains a concern going forward for $DIDI and it may take many years until $DIDI reach profitability (that is if $DIDI ever becomes profitable).
17. Catastrophic Events – Two Murder Cases
In 2018, there were two cases where a girl was raped and killed when she took $DIDI’s hitch services. These murders created an intense public outburst and government attention in China, blaming $DIDI's inability to protect their customer
17.1 $DIDI stopped its hitch service after the second murder and implemented additional protective measures. Although no murders had happened with $DIDI after 2018, if such unfortunate case happened again, $DIDI will likely face even heavier criticism and public boycott.
18. Risk – Growth
Although the Street expects $DIDI to grow at around 25-30%, $DIDI already has a monopoly in China, and its ability to grow and maintain international market share remains to be proven.
19. Risk – International expansion and other initiatives
$DIDI need to continue expanding internationally and not having 90% of its revenue solely coming from China, if $DIDI aims to be a global company. $DIDI’s other initiatives may provide a diversified income stream for $DIDI
19.1 If these two components do not expand, $DIDI’s potential will be vastly capped at only being a China ride-sharing company, leaving no room for ‘valuation imagination’.
20. Risk – Driver Cost
Driver cost is by far the largest cost for $DIDI. If driver cost increases or legislations determines that $DIDI must classified their drivers as ‘employees’ rather than ‘independent contractors’, $DIDI would be even further away from profitability.
21. Regulatory Risk
Just days after $DIDI’s IPO, China’s internet regulator has announced that they are reviewing the cybersecurity of $DIDI and no new user registration will be allowed during the review.
21.1 Given that $DIDI is a monopoly and the previous case of $BABA and Jack Ma, regulatory scrutiny and antitrust action on $DIDI by the Chinese government is possible.
BREAKING: At the time of me publishing this thread, there are news that the $DIDI app has been removed in China citing cybersecurity concerns and allegation that $DIDI has sold data to western countries. When $DIDI can be downloaded again is unknown.
This signals the severity and the real possibility of a crackdown on $DIDI considering its monopoly in China. Therefore, regulatory risks must be considered when considering an investment in $DIDI.
22. Risks – Price War
Although $DIDI said it provides a different ‘service’ compare to its competitors, in my respective opinion, ride sharing is a ‘commodity’, which companies compete almost solely on price. Below is a brief history of $DIDI’s price war.
23. A $DIDI Price War History
In 2014, $DIDI only had 50% market share, whereas $DIDI’s biggest competitor, Kuaidadi, 40%. The two competed by going on a fierce price war. The price war was so fierce that the two spent 2 billion RMB in 2014 just to subsidize their customers
23.1 $DIDI has even burnt 40 million RMB a day in subsidies. Chinese have even half-jokingly said that ride sharing was free. After a year of price war, the two realized that it was unsustainable, and the two ultimately came into good terms with a blockbuster merger.
23.2 Soon after the merger, $UBER arrives at China, and $UBER's CEO Travis Kalanick said to $DIDI's founder, Cheng Wei, ‘there’s only two routes for $DIDI, either $DIDI accepts a large investment from $UBER or $UBER will crush $DIDI’. Cheng Wei rejected $UBER's offer.
23.3 Unsurprisingly, $DIDI and $UBER went on price war. Cheng Wei sensed that $DIDI could not beat $UBER alone, decided to invest in Lyft, $UBER’s biggest competitor in the US, and Grab, $UBER’s competitor in Southeast Asia. All these companies then all have price war with $UBER.
23.4 $UBER realized that having price war everywhere was not going to cut it, decided to sell $UBER China to $DIDI for about 7 billion and a stake in $DIDI. $DIDI also invested about 1 billion in $UBER. This thereby concluded the price war of ride sharing in China.
23.5 As the price war ends in China, $DIDI started its international expansion. Well, how did $DIDI expand? You guessed it, $DIDI started price war almost everywhere that $DIDI expand to. Until today, $DIDI is still having price war all over the world.
23.6 With so many price wars and fierce competition, it is hard to see when these price war will end. I am therefore doubtful to when $DIDI will be profitable.
24. Valuation
$DIDI currently has a market cap of 74.9B, a P/S ratio of 3 and EV/Sales of 5.42. $UBER has a market cap of 97.11B, P/S of 9 and EV/Sales 9.78. Although on its face, $DIDI is cheaper, this is not the reality, because $DIDI and $UBER recognizes revenue differently.
24.1 $UBER recognizes its revenue net of driver and merchant earnings and driver incentive, whereas $DIDI recognizes its revenue before driver earnings and incentives. This difference created the ‘delusion’ that $DIDI is cheaper than $UBER.
24.2 To better compare the two, I decided to compare the two companies’ net revenue (revenue – cost of sales). Bloomberg has estimated that $DIDI will have a 30B revenue in 2021, whereas $UBER 16B. $DIDI has a cost of revenue of 89% of revenue, whereas $UBER around 46%.
24.3 With these numbers, I calculated the Price/2021 net revenue for $UBER to be 11.24, whereas for $DIDI 22.70. $DIDI also has an EV/2021 net revenue of 40.97 larger than $UBER’s 12.21, On these two rough but more comparable terms, $UBER is cheaper than $DIDI.
25. Conclusion
$DIDI is the top 2 ride sharing company in the world. However, I am skeptical about $DIDI’s business model, as $DIDI will need to improve their margins while being handicapped by $DIDI’s biggest cost ‘drive cost’ as this would probably not decrease much.
25.1 Although $DIDI has a monopoly in China, such monopoly can only be maintained by low price. $DIDI must also continue its price war and discount price in other countries as they expand internationally. Regulatory crackdown/risks also just gotten VERY REAL.
25.2 In my humble opinion, $DIDI’s history of price wars, the ongoing price wars, combine with $DIDI’s inability to differentiate beside on merely ‘being cheap’, makes me skeptical of $DIDI’s long term success.
26. This is by no means the most comprehensive thread and I may have missed something about $DIDI, therefore be sure to write your insights or thoughts on $DIDI if you have any, especially if you have any contrary thoughts or a bull case for $DIDI!
27. Thank you very much for reading this thread! I hope you have learnt one or two things about $DIDI. If you liked the thread, be sure to consider liking it and retweeting it! It really does help me out a lot and I really appreciate it!
This thread may interest you and I would really appreciate your input/comments on $DIDI! 🙏🙏
If you are interested in $DIDI, here is another thread that i did which goes over some very sneaky (even borderline illegal) tactics $DIDI has played when they where trying to acquire their drivers.
When $DIDI first started, $DIDI did not have enough drivers, because taxi drivers in china do not know about $DIDI . To acquire more drivers, $DIDI employed some sneaky tactics. Here is a EASY thread on some of the sneaky tactics $DIDI has used.
Let's get started 👇👇
1. $DIDI's biggest competitor, Yao Yao Ride Sharing, was the biggest ride sharing platform in Beijing before 2013. Yao Yao like $DIDI had limited drivers. Yao Yao advertised on TVs to invite taxi drivers to Yao Yao’s event, where Yao Yao would install the Yao Yao app for drivers.
$DIDI after noticing Yao Yao’s advertisement, immediately added a very short $DIDI's advertisement that plays right after Yao Yao’s advertisement. The advertisement goes like this: ‘please call or message xxx-xxx, where you can immediately download the $DIDI app’.
Acquisition is one of the most fascinating thing. Acquire properly, a company can yield 100x returns. Improperly, a company can be doomed. Today, we look at some of the BEST acquisitions of ALL time.
Here is an EASY thread👇👇
Honorable mention - $DIS acquires Pixar & Marvel
$DIS acquired Pixar for $7.4 billion in 2006 and Marvel for $4 billion in 2009. Pixar has then created famous animations such as Wall E, Toy Story 3, Up, Inside Out, Brave, Coco, generating a gross box office of $10 billion.
Marvel Cinematic Universe has become the single greatest movie universe the world has ever seen. The Marvel Cinematic Universe has created a total worldwide box office revenue of $22.56 billion. All these do not include the profits from related merchandise and video games
$DADA's goal is to empower stores to have the ability to deliver everything to their customers within an hour on-demand. $JD owns 51% of $DADA. Here is a thread on the things you need to know as a $DADA or $JD investor.
Let's get started 👇👇
1. The Chinese E-commerce Market – Growth
The China E-commerce market has grown rapidly over the past decade and is poised to continue to grow for the coming decades.
2. China E-commerce as a % of total sales
Despite strong growth, Chinese E-commerce share has only taken up 24.9% of the total retail sales in consumer goods in 2020. There is still great potential in the coming 5-10 years in Chinese E-commerce.
$JD Health and $BABA Ali Health are $JD and $BABA's newest competition ground and the two biggest online medical platforms in China . Here is a thread on the things you need to know for $JD health and $Ali health.
Let’s get started! 👇👇
1. Problem
China have MANY medical problems. These include: poor structure of the Chinese medical system, inadequate/unequal resources, long waiting time, expensive medical services, sub-par medical quality and insufficient or unskilled medical staff.
2. Long waiting time
It is very inconvenient to visit a doctor in China unless you go to expensive private ones. There is not a clear distinction between a GP and a specialist, causing many elderlies, to crowd the hospital even when they only have a small medical issue.
$JD logistics is arguably $JD's BIGGEST MOAT. This thread will cover everything about $JD logistics that you need to know as a $JD or $JD logistics investor.
Let’s get started 👇👇
2. Problem
In 2007, Richard Liu, the founder of $JD, realized that to provide the best customer experience, $JD must have their own logistics network, because unlike the US, China did not have mature logistics companies that provide consistent speedy deliveries.
3. Solution
$JD logistics were established in 2007 to provide better experience for $JD customers. The establishment of $JD logistics was highly controversial back then; as the business model was unproven. Fast forward to 2021, $JD logistics has already become $JD’s biggest moat
$BABA, $JD and $PDD are the three biggest online E-commerce platform in China.
This thread will compare the three and address the difference between the quality, price, delivery speed, customer experience and shopping experience.
Let's get started 👇👇
1. $BABA
$BABA is the biggest Chinese online E-commerce platform with a market share around 50%, which is even larger than the combined market share of $JD and $PDD. The primary focus of $BABA is being a C2C platform. You can think of $BABA as a bigger and more successful $EBAY.
1.1 On top of C2C business, $BABA has also started their own Tmall B2C business to combat $JD. However, most shops on $BABA are still third-party shops now.