Posted today: Delta evades RNA vax too

6 of 100 vaxxed attendees at open-air wedding got sick.

In 2 with Covaxin, 1 (groom) died
In 4 with RNA vax, 1 hospitalized

All expected from measured 80% efficacy, yet PH officials say we don't need to worry.

disq.us/t/3yqfdib
Measured efficacy of 80% for RNA vaccines on Delta variant in the below paper. That's equivalent to 20% breakthrough rate relative to unvaccinated.

Remember this next time you hear someone claim vaccinated people can't get sick from COVID-19.

thelancet.com/journals/lance…
CDC advice that vaccinated should feel comfortable spending all the time they want indoors and unmasked with the 50% unvaccinated population while Delta surges through their communities doesn't sound so reassuring now, does it?
@michelleinbklyn you did the right thing
As the 4 RNA-vaccinated guests were symptomatic, you can be sure they're contagious too.

Note CDC stopped asking states to collect data on non-severe vaccine breakthroughs. So if these study authors had followed the CDC, they would have just reported the 2 hospitalized patients
Also today, Pfizer RNA vaccine found to be only 70% effective in Israel study (compared to 88% in England and 80% in Scotland)

timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry…
Correction: Fatal case was not the groom, or at least not specified as the groom. Thanks to @gshashank9798 for pointing out my mistake.
@gshashank9798 BTW goes without saying that outcomes would have been much much much worse if 40% of the people at the wedding were not vaccinated (the US national average). We need to get >85% vaccinated to reach herd immunity, but until then, the already vaxxed need to exercise caution.
DeSantis spokesperson defending Florida's don't ask policy: "It’s almost unheard of for a vaccinated person to get seriously ill with Covid-19. Therefore, people who are vaccinated should not be worried about getting infected from those who aren’t.”
So CDC that's what happens when you tell people that serious breakthroughs are very rare. You give the unvaxxed another rationalization why they don't need to get vaccinated.
It's now official: Israel says Pfizer efficacy is 64% for symptoms from Delta, lower than the UK's 88%. 93% for severe disease.

Maybe reassuring if everyone around you is vaxxed and healthy. Not so fine if you care for someone unvaxxed or sick.

usnews.com/news/world/art…
Now say we average out the various measures of Pfizer efficacy on Delta (88% England, 80% Scotland, 64% Israel) to get 77%. We can then estimate that instead of 4 vaxxed people getting sick, there would have been 4/0.23 = 17 people sick if nobody at the wedding were vaxxed.
Many are asking if the 64% is symptomatic disease only or all infection including asymptomatic.

It's each.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Lin, PhD-MD

Michael Lin, PhD-MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelzlin

5 Jul
Must always consider mechanism and data quality in COVID19 curve. Factors Topol misses: (1) UK cases started rising early June, and deaths lag by 1mo (2) cases in the other countries cited may be underreported, increasing the death/case ratio (Russia curves esp make no sense)
Another thing to consider is if Topol included precisely those countries that have the highest death/case ratios to make a contrast with UK, then he would have filtered in exactly those countries that are underreporting their cases.
Kind of frustrating that Topol would continue to make the same mistakes in data interpretation (no mechanism, no awareness of data quality, no awareness of selection bias)
Read 7 tweets
3 Jul
This thread, and probably the one it refers to by Topol, should be pulled. The study did not look at transmission from vaxxed people at all. Topol wrote "91% efficacy of blocking transmission of infection" when he should have just written "91% efficacy of blocking infection"
You can see the game of telephone going on here:
Actual results: 91% refers to the reduced infection of vaxxed people, similar to the 95% in clinical trials. All of this is pre-Delta. So kind of non-news.
Read 4 tweets
3 Jul
Sorry gotta go against Fauci on this one, just as I did in March 2020 on masks. If you don't want to be a breakthrough infection and pass on the virus (vaxxed still have ~20% the chance of unvaxxed with Delta) and you're highly exposed, then wear a mask. Simple, cheap, convenient
👏LA's Ferrer "We have enough risk and enough unvaccinated people for Delta to pose a threat to our recovery. And masking up now could help prevent a resurgence in transmission. This is a precautionary recommendation, given that we don’t have all the information we wish we had.”
Ferrer said there’s “increasing evidence that a very small number of fully vaccinated individuals can become infected with the Delta variant and may be able to infect others.”
Read 6 tweets
2 Jul
OK! Finally found data on breakthrough cases by each vaccine type. Includes hospitalizations and deaths too. Numbers currently too small to make any conclusions, but worth keeping an eye on this space, especially those curious about J&J efficacy:
oklahoma.gov/covid19/newsro…
Yes these Oklahoma Health Dept reports are excellent. Here's the # of breakthrough cases up to last week by manufacturer. I ran some Fisher's exact tests. The difference between J&J and Moderna case numbers comes up stat sig. Nothing else does (small #'s means low stat power)
If we get more #'s, we can run more stat tests to see if any of these differences become statistically significant (not more than 5% probability of being due to chance). But even better would be if we can find numbers from more populous states. Please help look if you have time!
Read 11 tweets
2 Jul
Some observations from the UK:
• Vaccines provide ~95% protection against death from Delta
• Deaths in vaccinees are in older people with preexisting conditions

Numbers as we expect for AZ and RNA vax, as is breakthrough severity risk factors

msn.com/en-us/health/m…
J&J is still expected to be a bit less efficacious. So rather than conclude everything's ok and that's the best we can do, I take it as certain people can use a booster if they are high-risk
We can do a back-of-envelope calculation for the expected impact. We’re predicted to get 30M cases, 1M hospitalizations, and 100k deaths in the next wave among unvaxxed. If our vaccines are 90/95/95% effective on these measures, and half of people are vaccinated, then...
Read 6 tweets
2 Jul
The US at large is now in positive growth for COVID-19 cases, as are exactly 25 states. This reverses a trend of decreasing cases in most states until last month. I'd love for the "no surge" prediction to be true, but it's looking like math is winning over wishful thinking again.
Sorry, 24 states. I do know DC, Guam, and USVI are not states, just tallied wrong
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(