"Under Section 43 D(2) of UAPA, the time period for which a person can be kept in jail for want of completion of investigation is 180 days. Under ordinary law, even in the most heinous of offences, a person cannot be detained beyond 90 days if..."
"...the police fails to complete investigation. This is the right to be released on ‘default/statutory bail’. According to Section 167 CrPC, this itself is an exception. Thus, Section 43D(2) of UAPA is an EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION under ordinary criminal law."
And if the charges against someone are indeed so grave, just go ahead and PROVE IT.
It's simple enough: investigate, get evidence, go to trial, convince the court!
How can grave crimes be treated so casually as to not get investigated and proven?
Are we "rewarding the police for their incompetence" or is this the idea itself? Keeping people in jail (because you don't like them) till they fall sick and die? Where are we? Xinjiang?
"I am ready to face whatever is to be faced. In a way, I am happy that I am part of the process, not a silent spectator."
#StanSwamy video message before his arrest by NIA. Words that will haunt everyone who listens.
For me, he reinvented speech itself for Indian cinema. Taking it away from the distant theatrical orations of the likes of Sohrab Modi. Down to ordinary human speech, intimate whispers, mumbles, bringing a sense of nearness and interiority.
The classic clash of styles came in Mughal-e-Azam, where his soft, sensitive Salim faced off against the thunderous Prithviraj Kapoor with...yes, words...but also silences, and speaking eyes.
The scene that framed this the best is his very entry....
All the grandiose pageantry of the Mughal court comes to us first, nobles, palace maids and eunuchs running about, orchestras heralding his arrival....
All that magniloquence comes to a halt in anticipation of his first words.
Free #StanSwamy before it becomes judicial homicide.
// Before his arrest nine months ago, he was physically independent and could eat, walk and take a bath on his own, but since his judicial custody, “all that is disappearing one after the other". //
"Why must a veteran tribal rights activist with multiple ailments be compelled to suffer in this manner at his age on CHARGES THAT ARE YET TO STAND SCRUTINY IN COURT?"
He is 84, has Parkinson's and lumbar sponsylosis...and has been brought by the "system" to ventilator stage.
If we wish to keep calling ourselves a democracy, we simply must take a good look at UAPA.
A bouquet of powerful essays by #Dalit women writers. All of them wrote from the trenches, from an embattled zone. A whole experiential domain opening up, always enlightening, disturbing the received opinion, challenging the old discourse, enriching, humbling.
That striking cover art, deeply personal, contemporary, yet adorned by the old nature motifs, is by Dalit artist Malvika Raj. She works with, breaks and extends the Madhubani idiom, giving us powerful art. Some iconic images -- Savitribai, Ambedkar, Buddha -- partner the essays.
Malvika's art offers a perfect visual realisation of the world the essays weave: bustling with moral urgency, coping with trauma with a deeply introspective wisdom, and most off all a desire and commitment to write an as-yet unwritten history. @caselchris1 writes the lead essay.
@TIinExile@neha_aks Yes, but it finally does, does it not, somewhere during what can be called the classical phase, leaving not much of a trace in the post phase. What we see is clearly a very interesting transition to total patronymy.
@TIinExile@neha_aks Yes, there's clearly a widespread tendency attestable -- often the figure of the father is more fleeting, and it's also matrilocal. In this case, you also marry that against the overall tendency and attitudes from the devas, despite being kin.
@TIinExile@neha_aks There are two separate strands here. One is the higher degree of variety before codification, which is general. In this specific case, one sees a kind of classing on that basis, and conflict, which the higher deities try to adjudicate over.
@TIinExile Hi TN, okay, this is how I would offer my response. It comes not from any hasty perusal of literature, I did not do it then, and I did not it now -- in fact, took your words at face value and issued a corrigendum on that factual point on my post. But they come from a deeply...
@TIinExile ...considered view of things over decades of knowing/living a reality, just like millions of others, and you could spare some space in your mind and heart for it, if you do have that space. There exist multiple tracks here, in plain view. Tying them up is the lore related to...
@TIinExile ...Vishnu, which provides the primary mythic material here. Now, in Vaishnavite lore, it is natural that the deity's ineffable primacy is what is centralised...and hence Bali (and his Daitya lineage...before him Virochana, AND Prahlad) are shown in aspects of total devotion.
This has got to be the most unintentionally hilarious one ever :)) utter innocence on three counts:
a) whether a stable form of Bali iconography exists (it doesn't)
b) how a "Christian saint like Jesus" (!) is depicted
c) most cripplingly, what native Indians really look like!
Here's a small sample of Bali iconography picked from Wikipedia. This is from Badami, Karnataka, 7th c AD, with the Bali figure highlighted on the right. Doesn't look very much like a member of the "choti and thread" club :)))
Here's another. Choti-thread? Why on earth (or sky or pataal) would they at all want to turn a Daitya king into that?