Malcolm Clark Profile picture
Jul 5, 2021 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1./ The #WiSpa debate matters because it shows Gender Self-ID is unworkable. It opens women's single sex spaces to any male who says they're a woman, no questions asked, and women who complain about males wandering around naked get labelled transphobic.👇
2./ Supporters of Self-ID point out entry now to bathrooms doesn't require proof of being a woman and some transwomen who really LOOK like women can pass unnoticed. All this ignores the huge social taboo there is now that stops men who look like men entering women's spaces.
3./ A guy who wanders into a woman's changing room now will testify to the horror experienced and the quick retreat. Self-ID erodes that because it says it doesn't matter what you look like or what you're packing. There's no gatekeeping to become a woman. Nor to being trans.
4./ The trans movement widened the definition from transsexual to include cross-dressers, non binary and queer. So that now means trans includes this Canadian activist who identifies as a 6 year old and campaigns for access to girls bathrooms. 'She' also loves showing off.👇
5./ Self-ID means brave Stefoknee Wolscht gets to stroll into a girls changing room because...well she says she's a girl. And if you don't believe Stefoknee is for real...here's that great journalistic sponsor of car crash interviews, Pink News, covering 'her' uplifting tale.👇 Image
6./ Self ID means anyone who says they're a woman (or a girl) gets to enter women's single sex spaces and so that means one of my favourite trans fashion icons, Alex Drummond, who claims to be a lesbian can join Stefoknee in a stroll round my niece's changing room.
7./ Alex embodies the problem with saying a woman can look like anything. Alex says 'she' has male tackle and is proud of the beard. But if another person, just an actual bloke with a beard, wanders into your daughter's changing room how are you to know who's trans and who's not?
8./ There's no answer to this paradox. Here's a notable transman ridiculing the idea of someone who looks like 'him' going into women's spaces. "Can you imagine ME walking into a women's bathroom? I don't think they would be happy". So why would they be happy with Alex doing it?
9./ When critics of Self-ID pointed out some of these logical contradictions we were told to stop worrying. No one with a penis would or should be dangling it around in a girl's changing room. Here's Jolyon Maugham suggesting a good tut tut should stop that bad behaviour. 👇 Image
10./ That was 2019. In the wake of the row over Wi Spa the mood has altered. Twitter is veritably throbbing with trans activists declaring that if you have a daughter that might be shocked by seeing a penis in her changing room you should teach her...not to look. 👇 Image
11./ I hope that's now clear. Under Self-ID it will be legal for any male no matter what he looks like (maybe Stefoknee or Alex, beard, or no beard?) and if that male wishes to stroll around tackle-out it is your daughter's fault for noticing. What could possibly go wrong? Image
12./ The gender identity lobby should hope we manage to get such idiocy stopped. We know its proponents are largely daft. The public may not be so tolerant. They may conclude a certain ad last year from @ALLIANCELGB and @ForwomenScot wasn't only accurate. It was prophetic.👇 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Malcolm Clark

Malcolm Clark Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TwisterFilm

Nov 14
1./ 🧵Want proof the 'gender critical' movement is winning? Just 3 years ago the child-castration lobby group Mermaids was in court trying to strip @AllianceLGB of its charity status. Their witness arguments now sound even crazier than they did then. 👉theguardian.com/society/2022/n…
2./ Paul Roberts (he/him...surprise surprise) from the LGBT+ Consortium railed against @BevJacksonAuth for suggesting "male-bodied people however they identify do not belong in women's prisons. Or any other women's spaces." Her view is now backed by the Supreme Court.🍾🎉🥳 Image
Image
3./ As other proof of alleged bigotry Paul Roberts (he/him) cited a tweet by @AllianceLGB criticising cops for publicly supporting the trans lobby. This year a court agreed, ruling this kind of behaviour undermines the impartiality of the cops. Whoops.
telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/10/1…Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 9
1./ 🧵The BBC's Guilt.
Defenders of the BBC keep insisting it never promoted trans ideology. Yet here's more snippets from the BBC's own schools materials. In this clip primary school kids are told they can be born with a gender identity different from their body. 👇
2./ Telling children they might be born in the wrong body is profoundly confusing. When they experience puberty they may assume any discomfort they feel is due to this. Here's a woman who had her breasts removed cos she thinks she's male telling kids "everything fits now". 🤦‍♂️
3./ Here's a clip from the same BBC schools video in which the letters in LGBTQ+ are explained. Primary schools kids are told that Q can mean Queer or Questioning. Aren't most school kids likely to be ... "questioning" and therefore presume Q refers to them? 🤔👀
Read 9 tweets
Nov 9
1./ 🧵The BBC Litmus Test. The reaction to claims of bias shows how low BBC cheerleaders have fallen. Morally. @arusbridger, @bbcnickrobinson, @JohnSimpsonNews, @davidyelland & @DAaronovitch accuse BBC opponents of exploiting the claims. Let me tell you why they're so wrong. 👉 Image
Image
Image
Image
2./ The BBC didn't just twist news coverage to suit the political agenda of activists including its Pride group. As I pointed out yesterday it promoted trans ideology in schools where BBC educational materials argued there were 100+ gender identities.👇
3./ The tribal instinct to protect the BBC meant @RichardBentall ridiculed the notion, claiming @piersmorgan "was speaking bullshit". This Professor of Clinical Psychology ignored the fact I'd linked to a BBC schools video doing just that. Here's where things get really dark.👉
Image
Read 12 tweets
Nov 8
1./ 🧵What’s infuriating about the likes of @DAaronovitch, John Simpson and Rusbridger dismissing claims of BBC bias as politically inspired is the public complained about bias for years. This was @piersmorgan calling out BBC schools material that listed 100+ genders. In 2019!
2./ It was groups like @AllianceLGB and @Transgendertrd who successfully campaigned to get videos like this withdrawn. Unlike well-paid blowhards like @DAaronovitch or John Simpson the staff of these groups were all unpaid volunteers.
3./ No amount of Reith Lectures or Attenborough docs can make up for the fact the BBC actively gaslit a generation of children with toxic ideological garbage. And largely ignored the biggest medical scandal of our time. On our dime!
Read 4 tweets
Nov 6
1./ 🧵The BBC's Trans Scandal.
The censoring of trans issues by LGBTQ+ activists at the BBC is symptomatic of a bigger failure by the mainstream media: groupthink. A perfect example is the influence of that most pompous of lard-arses ex-MP John Nicolson.
telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/0…
2./ Nicolson used his status as a former (decidedly second-rate) BBC journo to bully fellow politicians into following his line on the trans debate. So desperate was he to bring 'Trans Joy' to kids he spread bizarre conspiracy theories about his opponents. And lied. How he lied. Image
3./ As an MP Nicolson even tried to force the broadcasting regulator @Ofcom to sing from his creepily paranoid songsheet about @AllianceLGB the only gay group to oppose the child abuse of puberty blockers. Yet Nicolson's judgement was so obviously dodgy.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 11
🧵1./ So who’s the guy the First Minister of Scotland is cuddling up to? A 2 minute search through the timeline of Sid Khan -“a remarkable Scot” 👀- reveals how dodgy his views are. What was Sid’s reaction on October 7th 2023 when young clubbers were blown apart and many raped? Image
2./ This “remarkable Scot” (sic) failed to express an iota of horror about parents being slaughtered in front of their kids or terrorists decapitating innocent civilians. His reflex response was to complain there was “wall to wall coverage” of the most deadly pogrom since WW2. Image
Image
3./ He also retweeted a post essentially justifying this pogrom as a means of terrifying Israelis who “must be made to understand that it is impossible to live in peace”. This remember was posted on the day of the massacre itself. Khan was glorying in Jewish fear. Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(