Malcolm Clark Profile picture
Jul 5, 2021 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1./ The #WiSpa debate matters because it shows Gender Self-ID is unworkable. It opens women's single sex spaces to any male who says they're a woman, no questions asked, and women who complain about males wandering around naked get labelled transphobic.👇
2./ Supporters of Self-ID point out entry now to bathrooms doesn't require proof of being a woman and some transwomen who really LOOK like women can pass unnoticed. All this ignores the huge social taboo there is now that stops men who look like men entering women's spaces.
3./ A guy who wanders into a woman's changing room now will testify to the horror experienced and the quick retreat. Self-ID erodes that because it says it doesn't matter what you look like or what you're packing. There's no gatekeeping to become a woman. Nor to being trans.
4./ The trans movement widened the definition from transsexual to include cross-dressers, non binary and queer. So that now means trans includes this Canadian activist who identifies as a 6 year old and campaigns for access to girls bathrooms. 'She' also loves showing off.👇
5./ Self-ID means brave Stefoknee Wolscht gets to stroll into a girls changing room because...well she says she's a girl. And if you don't believe Stefoknee is for real...here's that great journalistic sponsor of car crash interviews, Pink News, covering 'her' uplifting tale.👇 Image
6./ Self ID means anyone who says they're a woman (or a girl) gets to enter women's single sex spaces and so that means one of my favourite trans fashion icons, Alex Drummond, who claims to be a lesbian can join Stefoknee in a stroll round my niece's changing room.
7./ Alex embodies the problem with saying a woman can look like anything. Alex says 'she' has male tackle and is proud of the beard. But if another person, just an actual bloke with a beard, wanders into your daughter's changing room how are you to know who's trans and who's not?
8./ There's no answer to this paradox. Here's a notable transman ridiculing the idea of someone who looks like 'him' going into women's spaces. "Can you imagine ME walking into a women's bathroom? I don't think they would be happy". So why would they be happy with Alex doing it?
9./ When critics of Self-ID pointed out some of these logical contradictions we were told to stop worrying. No one with a penis would or should be dangling it around in a girl's changing room. Here's Jolyon Maugham suggesting a good tut tut should stop that bad behaviour. 👇 Image
10./ That was 2019. In the wake of the row over Wi Spa the mood has altered. Twitter is veritably throbbing with trans activists declaring that if you have a daughter that might be shocked by seeing a penis in her changing room you should teach her...not to look. 👇 Image
11./ I hope that's now clear. Under Self-ID it will be legal for any male no matter what he looks like (maybe Stefoknee or Alex, beard, or no beard?) and if that male wishes to stroll around tackle-out it is your daughter's fault for noticing. What could possibly go wrong? Image
12./ The gender identity lobby should hope we manage to get such idiocy stopped. We know its proponents are largely daft. The public may not be so tolerant. They may conclude a certain ad last year from @ALLIANCELGB and @ForwomenScot wasn't only accurate. It was prophetic.👇 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Malcolm Clark

Malcolm Clark Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TwisterFilm

Apr 17
1./ How did this scandal happen?
How did an 8 year old girl in this clip from @libsoftiktok end up injected with a drug invented to treat prostate cancer in old men? Let me tell you how fake science turned her hospital in Boston into a Ground Zero of this medical disaster.
1/18
2. The girl was treated at the Gender Management Service (GeMS) Clinic at Boston Children's Hospital. The clinic was founded in 2007 by Norman Spack, an endocrinologist, or hormone specialist. He was on a hormone mission ever since witnessing a trial in Holland a few years before Image
3./ In the mid 90s doctors there began giving a small group of teens GnRH agonists or puberty blockers to "pause" puberty. Spack now advocated for this to be embraced globally. He ignored the flaws of the trial, dissected here brilliantly by Michael Biggs.
Read 18 tweets
Apr 16
1./ The SNP, Misogyny and Helena Kennedy
3 years ago I said it was inevitable the SNP would make a hash of their Misogyny Bill and include men (transwomen) in their proposed law. The reason? Helena Kennedy is immersed in trans ideology. The evidence? 👉
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
2./ In a thread then I showed how Kennedy lavished praise in a series of LGBT+ events on Roz Kaveney, Peter Tatchell and other trans rights fanatics such as Naomi Wolf. Kennedy described Wolf as a good friend. How close a friend soon became clear. 👉
3./ At one event Kennedy chaired, Wolf spoke out against single sex spaces, railing against how the Far Right was allegedly engineering a moral panic about them. This was identical, she said, to 'gay panics' in the past. Cue applause from Plonk Noos.👇
thepinknews.com/2020/11/28/nao…
Read 12 tweets
Apr 13
1./ Ruth Hunt is a Bit of a Cult.
You have to hand it to Stonewall's ex-CEO, Ruth Hunt. She really knows how to lie. In her interview she claims Stonewall merely "listened to the experts" and cites one in particular. Why is this a lie?
1/of 15 👉
thetimes.co.uk/article/fe117e…
2./ Hunt names Polly Carmichael from the Tavistock. But for all her faults, Carmichael actually said of prescribing puberty blockers, "it would be disingenuous to say it is fully reversible." Yet Stonewall even today maintains blockers are reversible.
thetimes.co.uk/article/childr…Image
3./ Despite them being banned by NHS England and after a new study from the Mayo Clinic indicates they seriously damage the testicles of boys and may lead to cancer, Stonewall still says blockers are reversible Listened to experts? This is far from Hunt's only lie.
Read 15 tweets
Apr 12
1./ The Biggest Lie About the Cass Report
This video is just one source that claims the trans lobby has long supported the holistic mental health approach that Cass now recommends. This is a lie. Let me tell you the real story of the trans lobby's attitude to mental health.
2./ 25 years ago the trans lobby began a campaign to dilute and remove references to mental health in trans healthcare. A particular target was the Standards of Care of the global trans healthcare organisation WPATH and its predecessor HBIGDA. Why did trans activists do this?
3./ Up to 1998 the Standards of Care included a prominent warning (Principle 1) that sex reassignment "may be requested by persons experiencing short-term delusions or beliefs which may later be changed and reversed." It urged psychiatric oversight. The trans lobby hated that.
Read 15 tweets
Apr 11
1. The Biggest Idiot?
Many foolish politicians enabled the harm to vulnerable children which the Cass Review has now exposed. None did so with the enthusiasm of John Nicolson MP who went to court to back Mermaids, the child-harming charity that promoted puberty blockers.
1 of 13 Image
2./ Nicolson appeared as a witness when Mermaids tried to have the charitable status of @AllianceLGB removed. This despite the fact that one of the Trustees of Mermaids at the time, Jacob Breslow, published a book and spoke at a pro-paedophile conference. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-631378…
3./ You'd think Nicolson might have bothered to check the views of the Trustees of a charity for which he offered legal testimony. In his book Breslow tells of how horny he became as a 12 year old "queer child" gyrated in an "exhilarating" sexualised performance in front of him. Image
Read 13 tweets
Apr 7
1./ Why do LGB oppose TQ+
Why do lesbians and their gay male brothers get upset by the sort of LGBTQ+ placards on show in Edinburgh urging lesbians to "love dick"? It's just the latest example of the trans lobby's open contempt for homosexuality.
1/ of 7
2./ The core idea at the heart of the modern trans project is summed up here by a trans activist at Brighton Pride: "if gender is on a spectrum then homosexuality doesn't really exist". This argument made it into a tax-payer funded film celebrating 50 years of Pride. 🤦‍♂️
3./ Let me be clear I don't feel any animus towards trans people trying to get on with their lives. I filmed for months with the fabulous April Ashley for a series for ITV. I never thought April was a woman but used his preferred pronouns. I would not do that now. Why not?
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(