If your pro-critical race theory piece is published in the New York Times, you're writing to an audience who already agrees with you. You're convincing no one.
Kind of think this point is getting overlooked.
"We need to write a conjoined piece about why banning Critical Race Theory in Kindergarten is bad. Who should we pitch it to?"
"I know, the paper of the 1619 Project!"
"I know, the paper of the 1619 Project!"
Beyond the many other flaws to this whole episode that others have pointed out better, this one feels overlooked.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
