Why are the left so angry with @Guardian? Like many other newspapers, it does some very good journalism, sometimes makes mistakes and has its own ideological blind spots. But I don't think the anger is as much to do with its coverage as a systemic failure of accountability...
When the NY Times was exposed over its disastrous pre Iraq war coverage, it famously published a front page apology to readers. Although it went on to repeat many of the same mistakes, the apology mattered. It was an important moment of humility and self-reflection...
In contrast over the last 5 years @guardian has proved itself institutionally and almost pathologically resistant to meaningful accountability at every turn...
It began by opting out of joining a recognised independent regulator as recommended by Lord Leveson, and then scandalously supported the Conservative government's decision to scrap part 2 of his inquiry into the roots of institutional corruption in the press...
Since then, time and time again it has failed to even acknowledge obvious and demonstrable mistakes... theintercept.com/2019/01/02/fiv…
This is not about bias or even selective facts, but basic reporting failures, including reliance on single anonymous sources with obvious hidden agendas...
Long before the #LeakedLabourReport, evidence had already surfaced which exposed how badly they got the story wrong over antisemitism in the Labour Party... mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
For weeks both before and after publishing our research, I had lengthy exchanges with head of public affairs, 'readers editor' and one or two journalists. I offered to present and discuss our findings with editorial staff but was brushed off...
and not even a single public acknowledgement of the myriad reporting errors we documented. This is a shame above all because it engenders its own ideological blind spots amongst some of the left...
whose frustration gets magnified in the Twitterverse and manifests as untempered vitriol against anything and anyone associated with the newspaper, and the important and real journalism that @Guardian often produces falls on increasingly deaf ears.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Schlosberg

Justin Schlosberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jrschlosberg

13 Jun
Quick update on this.. since @EuanPhilipps and @LabourAgainstAS studiously ignored my requests to disclose the 'substantial body of evidence' they claimed to have compiled and submitted on me in relation to antisemitism, I made a subject access request to @UKLabour...
Unfortunately, in keeping with other examples of the party doing everything it can to undermine the most basic of democratic rights, @UKLabour have unlawfully ignored my SAR in spite of repeated requests for a response...
I will now be making a formal complaint to @iconews. In the meantime, I reiterate my appeal to @LabourAgainstAS and @EuanPhilipps to disclose the evidence they claim to have on me...
Read 4 tweets
20 Apr
A thread in response:

I’ve always admired the work of @medialens. Both their critical alerts on mainstream media coverage and their efforts to engage politely and constructively with journalists has been a big influence on my own research as well activism. However...
their critical review of this new book about @Guardian betrays, I think, a fairly recurrent and fundamental flaw in their analysis of the media...
Their review opens with a reference to what Chomsky and others have articulated as the ‘non-conspiratorial conformity’ of mainstream media journalists...
Read 16 tweets
13 Feb
since @LabourAgainstAS seem to have gone a little coy about this, I'll take an educated guess at what's in their 'substantial body of evidence' against me...

1. They'll accuse me of sharing a platform with Jackie Walker whom I have publicly criticised...
Because like anyone with an ounce of sanity, I don't believe a person with Jewish heritage who then chooses to marry and spend their life with another person from an orthodox Jewish family, who observes Jewish rituals and customs, actually hates Jews...
2. They'll say I defended/supported/campaigned for Chris Williamson because I objected to his suspension and believe that, like Ken Livingstone, people who say insensitive and silly things sometimes are not necessarily antisemitic...
Read 16 tweets
16 Dec 20
@TheCanaryUK, journalism and free speech:

Like all news outlets, The Canary produces good and bad journalism. The same can be said of the Guardian, BBC and even the Daily Mail...
I don't agree with some of its editorial positions and at times I find some of the reporting over simplistic. But it also does extremely rigorous, well-sourced and informative analysis that addresses issues often overlooked by mainstream press (cf its reporting on Venezuela)...
What is relatively unique is the degree to which The Canary has been attacked by the left, centre and right. This is partly because of a perception that it has challenged the reach of mainstream media, especially on social media...
Read 18 tweets
29 Oct 20
1. A timeline of Jeremy Corbyn’s key interventions and public statements about tackling antisemitism...
2. In April 2016 Jeremy Corbyn said he wanted to ensure the party took robust action against any member expressing anti-Jewish sentiments.

#LabourLeaks show Corbyn emailed then General Secretary Iain McNicol in April about antisemitic tweets, asking the party to take action.
3. #LabourLeaks also show emails where Corbyn and John McDonnell make proposals to tackle antisemitism including efficient processes, detailed guidance on antisemitism, and forming a group of Jewish communal bodies and representatives to advise the Party on tackling antisemitism.
Read 27 tweets
23 Oct 20
As pressure mounts on universities to adopt the controversial IHRA definition of antisemitism, below is a snapshot list of individuals and institutions who have warned against its use in any kind of formal code... And still journalists frame it as ‘universal’ and ‘consensual’:
Kenneth Stern – Director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate and the chief drafter of the original IHRA definition who said in 2019 it “was never intended to be a campus hate speech code”
Sir Geoffrey Bindman QC
Stephen Sedley – former appeal court judge
David Feldman – Director of Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism
Geoffrey Robertson QC
Hugh Tomlinson QC...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(