Dick, House, Ephgrave, and Blair (top serving or former MPS officers) have had the brass neck to issue a naked denial to the conclusions of a report listing countless, evidenced examples of corrupt behaviour designed to protect the organisation.
In other words, they are repeating PRECISELY the same sin of which the #DanielMorgan Panel accuses their organisation in its report.
And what are we to make of this?
Are they serious people?
Or are they simply propagandists?
The panel accuses the MPS not of taking brown envelopes, (although this occurs) but of a specific type of behavioural and institutionalised corruption.
Are they serious people?
Or are they simply propagandists?
The panel accuses the MPS not of taking brown envelopes, (although this occurs) but of a specific type of behavioural and institutionalised corruption.
It is THIS that their crafty generalised statements seek to cover up.
On and on and on it goes!
On and on and on it goes!
Furthermore, this is the most insidious corruption, disguised and hidden by layer upon layer of other deceptions.
It can, and ultimately will completely destroy an organisation from the inside. Cancer is a good metaphore.
It can, and ultimately will completely destroy an organisation from the inside. Cancer is a good metaphore.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
