There is a new @AtthegatesGBG record, "The Nightmare of Being". A new At The Gates album is always something to celebrate - they're legends for a reason. Recent albums have seen them getting more progressive, and more conceptual. This one dives into the philosophy of pessimism!
Pretty much peanut butter and jelly for the kind of death metal they're going to hit you in the face with. This record starts with some pretty "traditional" tracks - Spectre of Extinction, The Paradox, and Nightmare of Being.
They ease you in to the progressive bits - you start to hear more layered textures, more small sounds and queues in The Paradox. Choir sounds. Soft acoustic guitar.
The Nightmare of Being slows things down, but builds back up nicely. It's here the album really kicks into the stride its going to hold for the rest of the album - complex soundscapes that lurch into that classic at the gates fury.
That a band this beloved can swing this hard at the conceptual really shows why they're at the top of the game. They know what their audience really wants, and what we want is *interesting at the gates records*. This is a super interesting record.
Garden of Cyrus goes full in on the prog. This is where you get the least amount of "traditional" At the Gates. It's closer to Opeth or, by dint of the Sax, Rivers of Nihil. I love that this is an At The Gates song.
It's heavy without being pummeling. Someone is going to hate this song, but fuck those people. They have bad taste. After the descent down that is the first 3 tracks, this starts to settle in.
The rest of the album follows the thread - dealing with how to stay present in a world that is indifferent to your existence. It's dark, it's heavy, it rips, and it's beautifully stark.
If Slaughter of the Soul is an A+ (which, it is - all time classic), this is a solid A. It's interesting, its complex. It won't have as many tracks that stand out, but as an album, it works front to back. Worth listening to without distractions.
At the motherfucking gates, my friends. At the motherfucking gates.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Those of us who remember when open source was the novel underdog, allowing us to learn, grow, and build things our proprietary peers could not - we tend to see the relationship to corp $ in OSS as a net benefit, pretty much always.
That's because we remember when it wasn't so, and it took a lot of work to make it legit. But if you started your career with that as the ground truth, you're much more likely to see the problematic aspects of it; that your open code can be used by folks in ways you dislike.
Or that it simply puts more money in the pockets of the already wealthy, which it 100% absolutely does. You don't have to fight for the legitimacy of the open source network effect. You don't have to explain its value to anyone. Those arguments were already won!
My friends - sell that shit. If you have a significant amount of your wealth in crypto, but not similar amounts in dollars - get thee to the dollar, and hurry up. Maybe it doesn’t implode today, maybe not tomorrow - but it’s going to implode.
And when it does, I promise you, the large holders of Bitcoin are not going to be the ones who suffer. You are. You do not want to be the small fish in a collapsing market.
And you’re the small fish. If you roll your eyes and ignore me, that’s okay - just make sure every other part of your life is set, and gamble away with your bad self. But it better be set in other assets, because the smoke is getting hard to ignore.
If you think Bitcoin is for the little guys - check out the grift Elon musk just pulled off in plain view. He gives a fuck about the environmental impact - he cares about the stock taking a hit when index funds rebalance. And he unwound that Bitcoin position first.
All y’all get to hold the bag, though. Because he can move markets, and y’all can’t. No amount of decentralized block chain chicanery is going to change that truth. Have a lot of money? Easier to make a lot of money.
Oh, and while you’re all saying it’s a stable store of wealth, akin to gold: can you imagine if he announced he would take payment in gold, pumped the price of gold, and then dumped it? You cannot. Because it’s not a stable store of wealth yet by any stretch.
I have a mild obsession happening with how well written a song Snow Patrol's "Run" really is. I love that it started when he was blind drunk, fell down a flight of stairs, and then what came out was "Run".
That the song becomes about yourself, in addition to your loved ones, it just layers on the grace and redemption required to love yourself. And to love anyone else.
Stick that with what is a pretty simple guitar arrangement, and you wind up with this simple but devastatingly effective song. If I sing it twice in a row it's hard not to get choked up.
I think it’s clear that ethically licensed software *won’t* be As Big As They Can Be - by design. I suspect they can still find pretty widespread use and safe adoption.
The ml5 code of conduct (github.com/ml5js/Code-of-…) has clauses in it that feel not very different from any SaaS terms of service. They perhaps cover more explicitly, but most (not all) terms of service or proprietary contracts can terminate for convenience.
If I’m a business looking to use ml5.js - I would have real questions about wether that’s a good fit. Not because of fear of running afoul of their ethics clauses (easy enough to avoid) - but more because they clearly say it’s for teaching, creativity, and social good.
Let’s talk about Mike Kail being convicted. Full disclosure, I’ve met Mike a handful of times socially - he was definitely in the same infrastructure and venture scene. We have lots of connections. My recollection is he was nice and eager to be helpful. justice.gov/usao-ndca/pr/f…
In that scene (executive/founder/venture) it is very common to be introduced to other founders or executives, for the specific purpose of giving advice and aid. I try and do this as often as humanly possible - I never say no (sometimes it’s a “not this week”, but never “no”)
Sometimes you do that and everyone clicks - your advice is helpful, the team likes you. At that point it’s common to offer an advisory role - that usually comes with a small stock grant. I always turn these down. For three reasons.