I'm baffled here. Do people think the problem of subway homelessness is that City is unaware of where homeless people are? That city social workers are standing by, waiting to rush out and fix everything, if only the public would call 311 and tell them where to go?
Also, after years of talk and billions in NYC Dept Homeless Services funding, where are all these city workers rushing to respond at 4AM or on a weekend? Hell, I'll settle for a city agency that even answers the phone after 5PM on a weekday.
"Now since there's a number other than 911, this problem will be solved!" Do people really believe that? I guess some do.. But it doesn't matter who answers your call. What matters is this: 1) Who will respond? 2) When? 3) What should they to do? 4) How can they do it?
And NYC's wonderful and underpaid 311 and 911 operators are quite capable of transferring calls from one system to the other. They do it a lot.
This wouldn't bother me so much if it were just a random tweet. But Carlina Rivera is a NY City Council Member (and a Capricorn, not that I asked linktr.ee/carlinarivera). This isn't "big." It's not anything. Certainly not a solution. We need better leadership.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes. This is how I roll. I will question, insult, block, and then publicly shame and mock. It's not like me, but I don't care. I know too many people who have died. This is no joke.
I can do nothing to force people to get vaccinated. I can certainly not give them social acceptance. Call them out. It's not OK.
You "choose" not to get vaccinated against Covid? What am I supposed to supposed to say? "Wow, what a fascinating personal life choice!" Fuck you.
It's not a goddamn tattoo. It's a vaccine, the literal vaccine to a killer virus.
My city council member elect speaks.
Hot take: Let's _NOT_ fund a NYC Department of Beekeepers.
Indeed, NYPD has 2 beekeepers. It's the right number. Better yet, when Officers Lauriano and Mays aren't dealing with bees, "they work as patrol cops." nypost.com/2019/05/30/mee…
Extra points for taking a feel-good bee story and using it to accuse Officer Mays, the beekeeper, of "terrorizing Black and brown folks with impunity."
Breaking news: "Lauriano retired. So it’s a one man unit."
So let us be becalmed with bee stories, thank Officer Mays for his beekeeping acumen, and, again, NOT fund of a civilian New York City Dept of Beekeeping.
There are 3.7 million registered Democrats in New York City. Yet only 800,000 New Yorkers -- 22% of _registered_ voters -- bothered to vote for the next mayor. This is not a sign of a healthy democracy. (And Adam's margin of victory seems to be less than 8,500 votes.)
Actually... more than 800,000 people voted! This (below) would indicate that 800,000 people ranked either Adams OR Garcia. Presumably many voters ranked neither. (Though whatever that number, the total is still a small fraction of 3.7 million registered Democrats).
It's about the % increase. NYC is worse than every city but Baltimore. I might try and spell it out. It's exactly what twitter isn't good for.
This statement, in the tweet: "NYC has fought back gun violence better than other major cities." It's exactly what the chart doesn't show. They just showed a chart to make it look official. That's the crazy thing. He could have just lied without showing contradictory data.
Ranked choice voting? Here's my guide. 1) Use all your choices! Doesn't matter how much you hate a candidate as long, as there's somebody you hate more. 2) There is one game to play. If you don't vote for a front-runner 1-4, still put the one you would prefer as #5.
What these preliminary results mean ,with 219,944 "inactive ballots" is that 23% of voters didn't put Adams OR Garcia in ANY rank. That's a shame if you care, since it seems to come down to those two. 16% didn't vote for the top 3?! You had 5 ranks. Don't leave blanks!
If you only put down two votes out of five because, perhaps, "those are the only two I like," and those two don't make it to the final round, your vote becomes "inactive. It literally does not count.
Fill out all the ranks when you vote! Even if you don't like your 5th choice. People who didn't fill out all five because they didn't "like" a candidate will lose their (unless they voted the 2 finalists). I suspect most Wiley voters would go for Garcia over Adams.
If you don't like Adams but voted for Paperboy Love Prince instead of Garcia as your 5th choice (presuming you didn't put Adams one through four), it's on you!
(Also, the stat nerd me loves this single elimination runoff system!) web.enrboenyc.us/rcv/index.html
How were _three_ candidates eliminated between Rounds 8 and 9? I thought he or she with least votes was eliminated?