The "CRT" debate is backwards because you have people arguing over solutions, but a large segment of the left and the press keep insisting the problem doesn't exist. You have to start by getting more people to acknowledge the problem, then we can debate specific solutions.
You have a response that has become pure gaslighting. It's people simultaneously arguing this (the normalization and promotion of neoracist ideas) isn't happening, but also it's a good thing if it is happening and only bigots could oppose it.
You have a whole movement normalizing and mainstreaming toxic and bigoted ideas in all aspects of society, including education. Those of us who object to those harmful views must counter them. That includes schools, where parents have a responsibility to protect their kids.
If you don't realize that teacher's unions don't care about your kids after this year, you're being willfully blind. So the only question becomes how do parents protect their kids from being put in those situations and indoctrinated with harmful nonsense?
The best answer would be competition. Give parents a real say in their children's education. Rich parents already have that with private schools, but others are stuck despite paying for that education via taxes. So fund students, not systems.
Until that becomes a reality, parents also have to fight against those seeking to harm their kids at schools without competition. That means actively participating in their education and raising hell when it deviates from what should be acceptable.
It's just a reality now that local gov't has a major role in setting the curriculum. The debate isn't whether they set one, but what is in it. So parents must participate and influence those decisions. They need to gain the power to have a say in what their children get taught.
That can include laws that restrict the curriculum. Those are not new or unique. There is a real concern if you make those laws too broad that they restrict actual education and things that kids shd learn, but the solution is to narrowly tailor them to address the actual issue.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AG

AG Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AGHamilton29

5 Jul
My God with these people. I called her out for a lie and then she blocked and proceeded to smear me behind a block (full thread below)

Now her friends are jumping in trying to get me banned for it.

This tactic is so despicable. They try to silence anyone who calls them out or confronts them about their dishonesty.

@DebraMessing actually retweeted that tweet lying about me because they are used to being able to completely silence any criticism.
I was going to let this go, but enough is enough. Now they are actively starting a harassment campaign targeting me.

Please report this tweet to @TwitterSupport for his attempted harassment:
Read 4 tweets
5 Jul
This is obviously a lie. There has not been one proposed law that would ban anyone from teaching this Douglass speech. The fact that this person would lie about what is actually happening like this doesn't exactly inspire trust in their fitness to teach anyone about anything.
So @saribethrose tried to respond to a factual assertion with an opinion piece also lying about what is happening & what people are concerned about, then she blocked me. Again, if these people can't be trusted to discuss issues honestly, they can't be trusted to teach your kids.
People are objecting to neoracist propaganda being taught to kids.

Left, knowing they can't defend the substance of those ideas to the public/parents, has reacted by 1) arguing we aren't defining that propaganda correctly (CRT) 2) lying about what is being objected to
Read 8 tweets
24 Jun
This did not go the way Joy Reid thought it was going to go. She doesn’t know how to debate substance so instead she does declares conclusions and gets frustrated when Rufo doesn’t just accept them as factual.
Notice that aside from just trying to yell over Rufo she doesn’t engage in the actual substance of the topic, her whole argument is over whether the things Rufo and others are (rightly) objecting to are technically defined as CRT. But that’s just definitional, not substantive.
Let’s say we concede this silly point Reid and others are focused on that the neoracist and intersectional propaganda being normalized and increasingly taught in schools isn’t technically CRT. Now what?

How does that change the debate over whether it should be forced on kids?
Read 5 tweets
20 Jun
This is from the Washington Post's homepage right now. A 5 minute video propagating ignorant neoracist nonsense. It's really astonishing the extent to which this stuff is becoming mainstream and normalized, especially by the press.
This is what the current education fight is really about, but people are intentionally pretending not to understand that. The same activists mainstreaming this stuff in the press are also trying to insert it into education. Trying to frame every subject around race.
These views are legitimately harmful and backwards. They shouldn't be normalized and they certainly should not be forced on young kids via public education that is funded by taxpayers. Parents have every right to be concerned and want to step in.
Read 6 tweets
20 Jun
Incredible.

Iranian elections only consist of hardliners because the regime limits who is allowed to run. That has been true since 79.

Not everything is about Trump.
The article is even worse than the headline. It's full of misinformation meant to deflect blame away from the regime for their behavior by pretending they were moderating before Trump. This propaganda isn't even an opinion piece, It's published with a byline of "CNN staff".
The whole article is premised on the idea that moderates actually enjoyed substantial prominence in Iran before Trump withdrew from the Iranian nuclear deal, which will come as a shock to anyone who knows anything about Iran's actions at the time.
Read 5 tweets
20 Jun
These tweets were back to back when I did a search on this topic. As always with such incidents, responsible people should wait for the facts.
CBS local news is reporting that the driver is telling police it was an accident where his foot got stuck, but a bunch of other outlets are citing @DeanTrantalis claiming it was a targeted terrorist attack.

Possible, but irresponsible to speculate unless he has more info.
@DeanTrantalis Now people with large platforms are amplifying claims that this was an attack targeting DWS.

Maybe that's accurate, but seems we need more info first.

Anyways, praying for those injured and the family of the person who died.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(