Starmer should just spend every question asking Johnson detailed football questions.
Starmer looks up at Kim Leadbeater, now in the Commons. It's a "special and emotional moment on these benches" to see her there, he says.
Starmer: "We wall want our economy to open and get back to normal. the question is whether we do it in a controlled way or chaotic way."
If infections reach 100K a day, what does the PM expect the number of hospitalisations, deaths and long covid to be?
PM: There are a number of projections and they are available.
Er, not really.
And we're back on the vaccine rollout.
Starmer: "The PM must and he certainly should know the answer to the question I asked him. That he won;t answer here in the House doesn't inspire confidence in his plan."
Starmer rename the Delta variant the Johnson variant.
Says, rightly, that the PM is reckless to open up everything all at once. But I do think Labour needs it's own concrete, well laid-out and comprehensive plan to make this attack work. He's a lot weaker for not having it.
Starmer: keep masks, improve ventilation, make sure track-and-trace is effective, and issuing payments for self-isolation. That is, to be fair, the foundation of a plan, but needs more detail.
Although it is good to hear at least one party talk about ventilating building - one of those things which would do a lot of good but is hardly ever discussed.
Johnson says Starmer "attacks" self-isolation. A completely deranged thing to say.
Johnson has so far ended every statement by asking Starmer a question. Tactic is rather obvious.
"What is the PM going to do to stop people deleting the NHS app because... millions of them are going to be pinged this summer to self-isolate?"
No answer from Johnson.
On masks, Johnson says we're moving from "legal diktat to personal responsibility".
Starmer: "He agrees it's commons sense because it protects the public but he won't make it mandatory. It's ridiculous."
Incredibly, Johnson is banging on about the European Medicines Agency again.
Grimly cynical and disingenuous answers from Johnson to Ian Blackford on the electoral bill. Says he wants to "protect the public from the idea of voter fraud" and that elections can be clouded by "the suspicion of voter fraud".
In reality, it is his party which has encouraged the baseless suspicion of voter fraud - a problem which does not exist in any meaningful way - to activate a voter suppression strategy.
The worst thing about Brexit is having to hear David Jones say the words "chilled meat". Like some kind of extremely tedious Bond villain, he calls for Johnson to do "whatever is necessary, legislative or otherwise, to fix the problem permanently".
Like being governed by cobwebs.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Priti Patel’s authoritarian Borders Bill is designed to criminalise those most desperate for our help inews.co.uk/opinion/priti-…
Here are some of the key provisions. The bill makes it an offence to "knowingly arrive in the UK without a valid entry clearance",
potentially criminalising all asylum seekers arriving via an irregular route.
It allows immigration officers to arrest people on boats when they have reached Britain’s territorial waters.
The policing bill, which silences protests, passed third reading last night. In case anyone wants to remind themselves of Boris Johnson's 'libertarian instincts' independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
I'm not a libertarian. It has a simplistic assessment of the state and a naive view of the market. But libertarianism is a proud, coherent, principled tradition of political thought.
There are libertarians who still stand up for unpopular freedoms, like protest, drug legalisation and free movement. They do exist. But not in this government.
I'm starting to emotionally prepare myself for a winter lock-down.
The fact that I have to do that makes me incandescent with rage. But it would be silly not to countenance it. They've clearly learned nothing. They have no sense of caution or sense. We're behaving in a way that invites further variants.
And a quick reminder: they could soon have been in a position to responsibly lift the remaining domestic restrictions if they'd controlled the fucking border. But they didn't. And now we are where we are.
Such an inane thing to say. We all want the end of restrictions to be fast and irreversible. No-one enjoys them. But it cannot be guaranteed and claiming it can suggests you don't know what you're doing.
This confusion between hope and reality - wonder where we've seen that before - is a key feature of how the government operates and why it so consistently fucks things up.
On the subject of not-enjoyable: Masks and food. Fucking hell. I now avoid certain foods - eggs, curry etc - if I know I'll have to wear it when traveling home.
Hancock should've been sacked yesterday instead of resigning today. The prime minister has no principle, no judgement, no belief in the basic standards of public life.
And of course he leaves saying it's about his private life. Got nothing to do with your private life. It's to do with hypocrisy, inconsistency, cronyism and damaging public trust during a pandemic.
Several people on here have made the point that Johnson cannot sack people for failing to abide by basic standards, because that principle may then be used against him. I think that's spot on.