Exhibit number 1 of why we have to get rid of treasuries for the public to ever elect representatives who will understand fiscal. The vast majority of public,...
..& many if their econ "teachers," will always think there is a "debt" problem as long as we have our current rococo system. Smart ppl know all spending by currency issuers shakes out to be direct spending,& the repo/primary dealers/treasuries system is irrelevant. Public doesn't
MMT explains and explains, but the media has something to point at, there is the "debt clock," "think" tanks point at the savings #, the public is afraid that # & China having $ (we buy from them tho!) & so on. The change to a no treasury system IS worth the political capital
... probably only way public at large will "get it."
MMTers understand doesn't matter, but still a tiny minority.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Raw Materials in the History of Economic Policy; or, Why List (the Protectionist) and Cobden (the Free Trader) Both Agreed on Free Trade in Corn" cambridge.org/core/books/vis…
Any correct heterodox theory of international trade must highlight the factors of decreasing vs increasing returns industries (primarily impact on domestic economy). #mmt
"Mercantilism and Economic Development:
Schumpeterian Dynamics, Institution Building and International
Benchmarking" google.com/url?sa=t&sourc…