In the long-run DeFi protocols’ value will depend on three key variables:

1) Global Reach
2) Market Structure
3) Pricing Power 

These variables may not only determine just how high DeFi valuations may get, but also determine how much value DeFi captures relative to ETH.

1/ Ethereum Economy and Value Capture
Global Reach - DeFi protocols will scale more efficiently across the world than legacy financial institutions.
Like the internet protocols we take for granted today (TCP/IP, HTTP), DeFi protocols are not beholden to any jurisdiction and are available everywhere.

This allows DeFi protocols to reach far more users and achieve true internet scale like the Facebooks and Googles of the world.
Market Structure - Will DeFi be a “winner-take-all / most” market?

It’s unclear how many winning protocols there will be per vertical, or whether “everything protocols” may emerge that completely absorb their rivals.
The most likely scenario to me is each vertical having 1-2 dominant protocols.

If every protocol is permissionless to use and build upon why not just use whichever protocols are best of breed?

Bundling doesn’t seem a likely winning strategy.
What this means is entire sectors of the financial services industry worth trillions of $$$ being replaced by just 1-2 protocols per sector.

That is an incredible market opportunity.
Pricing Power - How much can DeFi protocols charge users for their services?

This is the least certain variable of the three, but may be the most important in determining the terminal value of DeFi protocols.
On one hand open source development and permissionless protocols lead to low switching costs (competitors can copy your code and users can leave in an instant) so it's possible protocols will have low pricing power over users.
There’s also a delicate balance in managing stakeholder incentives in DeFi, and it's unclear how much extractable value there will be (or should be) for token holders today or in the future. placeholder.vc/blog/2019/10/6…
On the other hand there are legit ways DeFi protocols can build sustainable competitive advantages that may allow them to achieve greater pricing power than what appears on the surface.

Wrote about this in depth here.

messari.io/article/defi-c…
Some protocols may also be able to capture more value depending on design decisions.

Ex: MakerDAO’s cost of capital is zero due to it creating its own lending inventory, allowing it to capture more value than secondary market lenders which most source inventory and pay for it.
Anyways, so where does ETH fit in?

Well think about what value capture looks like if DeFi protocols have low pricing power.
On one hand lower margins for DeFi protocols means more surplus to users, both on the supply and demand side (DeFi protocols are marketplaces).

But it also means Ethereum captures a higher % of total fees per transaction as gas becomes a larger portion relative to protocol fees.
If this scenario plays out then Ethereum may end up capturing more value from DeFi than DeFi protocols themselves (not even including ETH’s monetary premium)
@CryptoHayes makes this assumption in one of his latest DeFi essays that leads to some wild valuation targets for ETH.

link.medium.com/0EEoLnYCGhb
So where does this leave us?

DeFi protocols will likely have global reach and winner-take-most market structure for each vertical, but unclear pricing power.

If DeFi protocols do indeed have low pricing power it would be the cherry on top for the already bullish case for ETH.
Only time will tell how this plays out.

Wrote about these ideas a few months ago in @MessariCrypto newsletter, but figure it needed an update after more thought on the topic. messari.io/article/messar…
Btw one of the few titles that wasn’t my choice lol

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Watkins

Ryan Watkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RyanWatkins_

29 Jun
In coming weeks it is very likely USDT’s share of the stablecoin supply on Ethereum will fall below 50% for the first time.

USDC is quickly emerging as the dominant stablecoin on Ethereum in large part due to its growing role in DeFi.

1/
Over 50% of the USDC supply now sit in smart contracts - equivalent to ~$12.5 billion.

Although this percentage is not as high as DAI, USDC leads by a wide margin in dollar terms and has become the preferred stablecoin in DeFi for now.
Unsurprisingly lending protocols MakerDAO, Compound, and Aave are the largest consumers of USDC, holding ~23% of the USDC supply.

USDC in MakerDAO is primarily used to support the DAI peg via the Peg Stabilization Module.

USDC in Compound and Aave is deposited to earn yield.
Read 10 tweets
29 Jun
There are many reasons why Ethereum may become more widely adopted than Bitcoin.

But the most under-appreciated reason is that Ethereum offers a progressive vision that is likely to resonate with more people and better captures the zeitgeist of our times.
Think of blockchains like nation states, but with the difference being that it’s trivial to enter and exit. What excites the most people to migrate and stay?

I’d be shocked if it is a restorative vision as Bitcoin is often framed as.

That sounds wack to most people.
This becomes more important the more you believe that the path to mainstream adoption is more people and capital migrating to the cryptoeconomy than the opposite - the cryptoeconomy embedding itself into incumbent institutions.

Blockchains need to sell a compelling story.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jun
I’m increasingly skeptical of the economic viability of pegged asset protocols.

The issue is that decentralized custody - a requirement for such protocols - is an inherently low margin business and won’t provide enough returns to nodes to sufficiently incentivize security.

1/
Fundamentally nodes securing pegged assets must have more at stake than the assets they’re custodying.

So if nodes custody $1 billion they must have more at stake than $1 billion otherwise they’d just steal the assets they’re custodying.
The above is why many of these protocols such as Ren and Keep have overcollateralizion requirements - it’s necessary for security in an environment where you can’t rely on trust.

The issue boils down to incentivizing those nodes to put up enough stake to secure assets custodied.
Read 14 tweets
23 Jun
Olympus DAO now owns 98% of its own SushiSwap liquidity.

Impressive asset to have built organically through its bonding mechanisms.

Protocol controlled value is powerful for stablecoin projects as it allows them to reduce dependence on third party actors for currency management
Continue to believe non-dollar pegged stablecoins are the most exciting area of decentralized stablecoins. messari.io/article/the-ar…
Basically the idea here is that by being the primary liquidity provider for OHM Olympus DAO can take actions that wouldn’t be rational for an external actor to do without paying them, but rational for Olympus DAO to do because it’s cost of capital is 0%.
Read 4 tweets
17 Jun
Seeing a lot of lazy criticisms about algo stablecoins recently.

It’s the easy take to have after seeing all the Ponzi games.

But if you think that’s all there is to to the sector, you’re missing out on a handful of promising projects like Terra, Frax, RAI, and Olympus DAO

1/
Terra in particular, is beyond promising - its real.

Its UST stablecoin is one of if not the most widely adopted decentralized stablecoins in circulation with real world use.
We’ve had a ton of our community analysts cover these projects recently.

Terra
messari.io/article/terra-…
Read 7 tweets
15 Jun
We live in a multichain world.

Today there are 10 blockchains storing more than $10 billion in assets, as well as several ecosystems with meaningful development and activity.

THORChain is vying to sit at the center of this world as infrastructure for cross-chain finance.

1/ Image
For nearly a decade people have speculated about the potential for decentralized exchange between blockchains with some conceptualizing it as the “holy grail”.

Today it’s still largely an unsolved problem at scale. Image
THORChain is an attempt at fulfilling this vision.

It is a cross-chain liquidity protocol built using the Cosmos SDK that aims to provide a variety of cross-chain financial services including exchange, lending and borrowing, and synthetic assets.

messari.io/article/thorch…
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(