Thread by @AukeHoekstra

Two well known conservatives @PierrePoilievre and @MarkPMills convincing each other that EVs might be worse for the environment and the science is unclear.

As a scientist that actually studies this I can assure you that the science is clear and EVs much less CO2.
🧵

https://twitter.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1412373261791334404

First objection: batteries are largely sourced from China because of Cobalt and rare earths.

Correct answer given in the video: North America used to produce 80% of this stuff but decided it didn't want it anymore.

Me: yes, it's basically like a lot of other stuff from China.

What drives me crazy is that Canada has SO much more resources than tar sands.

But somehow conservatives only want to produce fossil fuels and then start complaining that the alternatives (which are much cleaner) are not perfect.

Get off the couch and embrace the new economy!

Second objection: because China uses lots of coal "the honest scientific answer" is that we don't know if EVs emit less CO2.

I'm sorry, that's not "an honest scientific answer" but an objective untruth. EVs emit a LOT less CO2. This is what I've been researching for >10yrs now.

My pinned thread gives lots of example studies but you can also play around yourself and e.g. choose a battery from China and Denmark energy mix (=comparable to Canada).
transportenvironment.org/what-we-do/ele…

So this is another example of "people are entitled to their own opinions but not their own facts".

EVs already emit less than half of the CO2 of comparable cars and have the potential to get very close to zero emissions as we green electricity and mining.

That's a fact.