Environmentalism:
We should destroy modern civilization and 500 years of tech progress necessary for billions of people to survive, just in case the increase in the atmospheric concentrations of a trace essential gas turns out to have vague ill-defined undesirable effects.
We should destroy modern civilization and 500 years of tech progress necessary for billions of people to survive, just in case the increase in the atmospheric concentrations of a trace essential gas turns out to have vague ill-defined undesirable effects.
The crusade against CO2 can only mean the destruction of life & civilization.
If you are an environmentalist who disagrees with this characterization, you are an unthinking moron who doesn't understand what they're being manipulated into by their TV and university.
If you are an environmentalist who disagrees with this characterization, you are an unthinking moron who doesn't understand what they're being manipulated into by their TV and university.
The only established effect of increased atmospheric CO2 is faster plant growth. All the other scare stories are dumb fiat science.
The cost of stopping CO2 emissions is billions of human deaths.
You have to watch a lot of TV to be stupid enough to even consider this.
The cost of stopping CO2 emissions is billions of human deaths.
You have to watch a lot of TV to be stupid enough to even consider this.
If you disagree with this thread, please go live one year without emitting CO2 or using any products whose manufacture emits CO2 and THEN come virtue-signal about how important it is to eliminate/reduce CO2 emissions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
