Share this page!

Steve Analyst Profile picture
Twitter logo
8 Jul, 5 tweets, 2 min read
Can't the UK just close their eyes to the problems and hope for the best, while talking tough in the domestic media? It's got us where we are today.
I don't think it was unreasonable to look at what the UK actually did, which was sign on on the dotted line.

It's a solution to the problem that the UK haven't implemented the part of the agreement that they said would be implemented by now, and it gives them more time to do what they said they would do.

Again we are treated to a festival of politicians claiming that the secret solution to the Irish border, that they had kept up their sleeve all along, was too late to negotiate.
Surely the people who said Brexit was worth eating grass for should be the first people anyone calls for dietary advice in the face of not being able to get certain food types.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Steve Analyst

Steve Analyst Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EmporersNewC

Steve Analyst Profile picture
4 Jul
Dear Mr @SimonMcCoyTV, I noticed the other day that you claimed “What we joined was a trading bloc”, and this is a damaging line to take for the country. Please let me explain. 🧵
Firstly, while it began in the economic field, the EEC was not introduced as anything other than a political project, and its political development can be seen developing shortly after its inception.
23rd November, 1959 the first move to a political institution is made with regular meetings of foreign ministers.
Read 44 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
30 Jun
How humiliating that the EU insisted that the UK follow the law that was passed when the UK were members and was the law when the UK decided to leave, and for which the UK should have been aware that it was a quite a long shot the EU was going to weaken its security dependencies.
What a terrible 'come down' that in choosing to be a 3rd country, the EU should treat the UK as a 3rd country.
Tom Harris has deleted his tweets from the referendum so you can't see his side, but here I am in 2016 explaining we know the laws, we know the treaties they do.

I have no patience for people saying that we expected to be treated as a special case when it comes to security.
Read 4 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
28 Jun
Is the government going to quantify these "barriers" that digital trade agreements remove?

Maybe provide an economic analysis of these "barriers"?

Only then will the sheer level of mockery I mean when using the inverted commas in this tweet be revealed.
Do a digital deal with China and that will be A-mazing.
Do a digital deal with Nigeria, and there would probably be a benefit there.
Read 6 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
22 Jun
What's the point of trying to convince a side that has farmers who are being damaged but would still vote to leave knowing it could put them out business and knowing they will be putting other people out of business.
There people aren't Eurosceptics anymore.

They aren't sceptical of Europe, because that would mean actually acknowledging European benefits after subjecting them to scepticism.

When did we ever see that?
Scepticism of the European project could possibly involve being sceptical of the negatives, which we never see.
Read 15 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
16 Jun
Does everyone remember when politicians said we can't have a referendum on the deal because people had voted for Brexit and it would be asking the public again?
Does everyone remember when they said that the problem with the deal had nothing to do with Brexit?
Does anyone remember them being pulled over the fact they have now argued that the deal *was* Brexit and *isn't* Brexit?
Read 4 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
16 Jun
There it is.

Sovereignty before solutions.
Sovereignty before peace.

But are media are still pushing the line that this is everybody's problem and not a problem caused by UK ideology.
The thing about "Taking back control of your laws" is that you can make decisions about your laws, not other people's laws. Especially not the laws you said you wanted no say over.

People who knew nothing about global trade refuse to accept the the most common method globally, attributes it to "EU thinking" and says they don't accept the position.

Gee, I hope we haven't listened to a whole load of people who didn't have a clue.

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @EmporersNewC has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @EmporersNewC!

Read all threads by @EmporersNewC

:(