When the Industrial Revolution took off in Northern England, the British realized they needed slaves a lot less - so they were the first to outlaw slavery. They felt they could bear the economic costs.

The US South's economy was built on slavery, they had a different opinion.
I'm the last person who will ever believe that the West "fought against slavery out of the goodness of their hearts".

If that were the case, they would have fought slavery in the 18th Century (before the Industrial Revolution), not in the 19th (after it).
In the US, the industrialized North (whose economy was not built on slavery) fought the South (which depended on slavery and was slow to adopt the Industrial Revolution).

Russia finally abandoned serfdom (which was close to slavery) as it industrialized. Not before then.
If you are talking about people who had a principled opposition to slavery, long before it was convenient to do so, think about the Quakers, Mennonites, Amish etc.

One legacy of slavery in the West, was an entire theology/scholarship built on the "inferiority" of certain races.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Onye Nkuzi

Onye Nkuzi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cchukudebelu

24 May
If Beijing loses interest in Africa, so will Washington.

We've watched this movie before. Once the Cold War ended, and Moscow was no longer a major player in Africa, Washington lost interest in Africa - left it to Beijing.

"Cold War hysteria" has rekindled some "interest".
Problem is that Washington has no real, sustained interest in Africa that isn't linked to the activities of some external actor, be it Al Qaeda or Beijing.

We saw this in the 1990s, when Washington pretty much lost all interest in Africa.
US policy makers know average Americans have no interest in Africa, so selling scare stories about "China taking over Africa", might trigger interest.

But even at that, the attitude of most Americans to Africa is, "let China have that sh*t hole, we've wasted enough money there".
Read 4 tweets
22 May
I remember reading an expensive report which claimed more tires were sold in Abuja than Lagos.

I quickly discarded it, but a foreign analyst, with no knowledge of Nigeria's context might not know, and still quote the report.
A big problem with data from Africa, is that a lot of it is not reliable.

I've paid for expensive reports, only to figure out that they simply lifted data from the UN Comtrade database and the NBS, and done little else.

Much of this data might not be reliable.
In fact, in many cases, you are better off designing your own survey questionnaires and sending people to the field to obtain the data. (It could be even cheaper and more reliable than some of these expensive reports).
Read 4 tweets
21 Apr
I think the collapse of research in Nigerian universities in the wake of the IMF/SAP era is one of the biggest tragedies in our history.

Western funding/academics now dominated research, and research topics were determined by Western, not local interests.
At one point, you had to write something about HIV/AIDS to get research funding, or act a subordinate to some Western researcher.

Oil and gas companies determined the direction of research, they were only interested in limiting their liability for oil spills/environmental issues
The Niger Delta Militancy triggered an inflow of research dollars, as the US still depended heavily on Nigerian crude (this was before the advent of Shale Oil and Gas).

Along came 9/11 and Boko Haram, and millions of dollars went into funding research into "radicalization".
Read 6 tweets
21 Apr
In North Korea, Kim Il Sung handed over to his son, Kim Jong Il, who then handed over to his son, Kim Jong Un, some say with "Chinese support";

But there are many examples in Africa.

1. Omar Bongo to Ali Bongo (Gabon, French support).
2. Gnassingbe Eyadema to Faure Gnassingbe (Togo, French support).
3. Idriss Deby to Mahamat Deby (Chad, French support).

Likely father to son dictator transitions.
1. Paul Biya to Frank Biya (Cameroon, French support)
2. Museveni to Muhoozi Kainerugaba (Uganda, US & UK support)
3. Paul Kagame to Ivan Kagame (Rwanda, US, UK & "international development community" support).
4. Teodoro Obiang Nguema to Teodoro Nguema Obiang (Equatorial Guinea, US support - especially from ExxonMobil and the Oil & Gas Industry).
Read 4 tweets
21 Apr
There are around 840 motor vehicles/1000 people in US. The figures for China were 204 motor vehicles/1000.

In 2019, 21.44 million vehicles were sold in China, compared to 17 million in the US.

If China reaches US levels of car ownership, that's around 80 million vehicles/year.
I think the Chinese Government is a lot more responsible about environmental stewardship than the US Government. In the US, it is about "having as many cars as you want", but Beijing is very deliberate about limiting car sales & is investing heavily in mass transit.
For example, to obtain a license plate to drive an internal combustion engine run vehicle in Shanghai, you'll have to shell out $12,000 - and there's still a queue, but if you purchase an electric vehicle, it is free.

So they are passionate about growing the electric market.
Read 4 tweets
15 Apr
"The Quad".

We've watched this movie before, with the same actors in different roles.

India's relationship with the Soviet Union had a lot more to do with practical geopolitics than ideology.

US was the major backer of Pakistan, its arch rival then.
A Soviet relationship with India, could come in handy in containing China - which was considered a major threat to Moscow.

China, on the other hand, saw Pakistan as a useful tool to contain India (India and China fought a couple of border wars).
US, on the other hand, took advantage of the rift between China and Russia - to support Beijing and further drive a wedge between Moscow and Beijing.

Beijing was very happy to support Pakistan to frustrate the Soviet Union in Afghanistan - and so was Washington.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(